CentOS7 firewall?
-
@anonymous said:
@JaredBusch That's crazy
Well once this 2nd install is done, we will know if it was a change from release 1406 to 1511 (eww same release # as Windows 10), or if it was a difference between using the Minimal ISO or DVD ISO as a base.
-
Wouldn't you think the minimal install would be the same on both isos?
-
@anonymous said:
Wouldn't you think the minimal install would be the same on both isos?
Yes. So I am honestly hoping that this Minimal install from DVD ISO also does not have it.
-
@JaredBusch Do you know of anyway to compare the two installs to see what packages are different? It would be interesting to know.
-
@JaredBusch said:
@anonymous said:
Wouldn't you think the minimal install would be the same on both isos?
Yes. So I am honestly hoping that this Minimal install from DVD ISO also does not have it.
But is must, because you used that ISO to write your guide.....
-
@anonymous said:
@JaredBusch said:
@anonymous said:
Wouldn't you think the minimal install would be the same on both isos?
Yes. So I am honestly hoping that this Minimal install from DVD ISO also does not have it.
But is must, because you used that ISO to write your guide.....
I used 1406 DVD on my guide. So it could be something they changed in the process between 1406 and 1511.
-
@JaredBusch I see. But why would you decrease security out of the box? That seems strange to do....
-
@anonymous said:
@JaredBusch I see. But why would you decrease security out of the box? That seems strange to do....
The firewall is still there (iptables) they just removed the management interface for some reason.
-
@johnhooks said:
@anonymous said:
@JaredBusch I see. But why would you decrease security out of the box? That seems strange to do....
The firewall is still there (iptables) they just removed the management interface for some reason.
I thought CentOS 7 used Firewalld and not IPTables?
-
@coliver said:
@johnhooks said:
@anonymous said:
@JaredBusch I see. But why would you decrease security out of the box? That seems strange to do....
The firewall is still there (iptables) they just removed the management interface for some reason.
I thought CentOS 7 used Firewalld and not IPTables?
I did too....
-
@coliver said:
@johnhooks said:
@anonymous said:
@JaredBusch I see. But why would you decrease security out of the box? That seems strange to do....
The firewall is still there (iptables) they just removed the management interface for some reason.
I thought CentOS 7 used Firewalld and not IPTables?
From what I've understood firewalld uses iptables, just makes it easier to manage. Kind of like ufw on Ubuntu.
-
@johnhooks said:
@coliver said:
@johnhooks said:
@anonymous said:
@JaredBusch I see. But why would you decrease security out of the box? That seems strange to do....
The firewall is still there (iptables) they just removed the management interface for some reason.
I thought CentOS 7 used Firewalld and not IPTables?
From what I've understood firewalld uses iptables, just makes it easier to manage. Kind of like ufw on Ubuntu.
It seems like they are two different applications but there isn't much info about it on the Fedora wiki.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FirewallD?rd=FirewallD/#Dynamic_firewall_with_FirewallD
-
@anonymous said:
I thought CentOS7 was using firewalld, not iptables?
I've been out getting groceries but... firewalld uses iptables, doesn't replace it. Whenever I see firewalld, iptables is still there.
-
@scottalanmiller But it is no firewall is running by default
-
@anonymous said:
@JaredBusch Do you know of anyway to compare the two installs to see what packages are different? It would be interesting to know.
rpm -ql >> list
On each box. The do a
diffon the two lists. -
@anonymous said:
@scottalanmiller But it is no firewall is running by default
Ah, it is installed but not running.
-
@scottalanmiller Right, so basically your whole box is exposed right?
-
@coliver said:
@johnhooks said:
@coliver said:
@johnhooks said:
@anonymous said:
@JaredBusch I see. But why would you decrease security out of the box? That seems strange to do....
The firewall is still there (iptables) they just removed the management interface for some reason.
I thought CentOS 7 used Firewalld and not IPTables?
From what I've understood firewalld uses iptables, just makes it easier to manage. Kind of like ufw on Ubuntu.
It seems like they are two different applications but there isn't much info about it on the Fedora wiki.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FirewallD?rd=FirewallD/#Dynamic_firewall_with_FirewallD
If you look at the project itself, they self describe as a management tool, not as a firewall.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@anonymous said:
@scottalanmiller But it is no firewall is running by default
Ah, it is installed but not running.
no, it is not installed at all see my above screen shot..
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@coliver said:
@johnhooks said:
@coliver said:
@johnhooks said:
@anonymous said:
@JaredBusch I see. But why would you decrease security out of the box? That seems strange to do....
The firewall is still there (iptables) they just removed the management interface for some reason.
I thought CentOS 7 used Firewalld and not IPTables?
From what I've understood firewalld uses iptables, just makes it easier to manage. Kind of like ufw on Ubuntu.
It seems like they are two different applications but there isn't much info about it on the Fedora wiki.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FirewallD?rd=FirewallD/#Dynamic_firewall_with_FirewallD
If you look at the project itself, they self describe as a management tool, not as a firewall.
That's what I was looking for. Thanks.
Ok right from their main page - apparently my Google Fu isn't very good today:
Support for iptables, ip6tables, ebtables firewall backends
