@pete-s said in I'm not a php dev, so what do you all think of this patch:

@pete-s said in I'm not a php dev, so what do you all think of this patch:

@jaredbusch said in I'm not a php dev, so what do you all think of this patch:

@pete-s said in I'm not a php dev, so what do you all think of this patch:

@jaredbusch said in I'm not a php dev, so what do you all think of this patch:

@pete-s said in I'm not a php dev, so what do you all think of this patch:

@jaredbusch said in I'm not a php dev, so what do you all think of this patch:

I just submitted this as a pull request to FreePBX's User Manager module.

I think it looks clean, but curious to what someone with more day to day PHP skills thinks about it.

Context matters when it comes to coding style. Do you have a link to the original source code?

The actual git is public as long as you are logged in to Attlasian.
https://git.freepbx.org/projects/FREEPBX/repos/userman/browse
They have a copy on Github but that is no longer kept in sync (apparently it is).
https://github.com/FreePBX/userman

Your code looks fine. It looks just like the original.

https://git.freepbx.org/projects/FREEPBX/repos/userman/browse/views/welcome.php

It is a pull request, it should.

I was discussing WHAT i did in my change, hence the diff in post 1.
Mostly using the ternary structure like I did.

Yeah, that was what I was commenting. It's fine.

In general if...then...else is clearer than ? to read but it also clearer to not put many php tags back to back. But that is how the original is done. So what you've done is inline with how it is written.

The only very minor thing I could find, would be to not use ' and " in the same statement, unless there is a reason for it.

So instead of:

<?php echo _(sizeof($directories)==1 ? " selected":'')?>

it would probably be better to do:

<?php echo _(sizeof($directories)==1 ? ' selected' : '') ?>

(easier to read when you're consistent with white space as well)

It will work either way so...

meant to use ' that was a miss on me.

@scottalanmiller said in Technologies Begging to be Ransomwared:

@dashrender said in Technologies Begging to be Ransomwared:

FYI - my experience in all of this is through the use of shares - so if shares aren't enabled.. then I'm guessing you're probably correct due to configuration.

Shares aren't on by default. But even when they are, nothing is shared out that a local non-admin user could access.

Yeah, and this is ultimately what saves you - OK now we're on the same page.

Thanks

@dbeato said in You Have Exceeded the Maximum Number of Computer Accounts - Windows and Active Directory:

@scottalanmiller This is for a standard user without any Domain Admin Privileges. I am assuming this is for a Technician joining computers that no one wants to have admin permissions.

That would be an example case. Yes.

I've solved all your problems 😎👍

Screenshot_20210709-165523_DuckDuckGo.jpg

Screenshot_20210709-165618_DuckDuckGo.jpg

@scottalanmiller said in What to ask for in a Cybersecurity Auditor ...:

@travisdh1 said in What to ask for in a Cybersecurity Auditor ...:

Let us know if you find a competent auditor. I've worked in IT for quite a few years and have yet to meet/find a decent auditor.

Do you want competence? Or do you want an auditor? You need to choose.

Exactly, lol!

@black3dynamite said in Proxmox VE 7.0 Released:

@pete-s
d4594fb8-14a6-49f2-acb4-bc87cedaa8b1-image.png

Seems reasonable to me. And Debian is super conservative in most cases. I don't see cause for concern in this case. And remember "based on" is kind of "for your information". Lots of things are "based on" unreleased products before. Most cars are "based on" models that never got to production. It's the quality of the final release, not the process of getting to the release, that ultimately matters.

I ended up using a tool from RDPSoft. You can take out monthly subscriptions to use their software. Very impressive stuff.

@pete-s said in VMware Carbon Black:

It can cause some seriously hard to track down problems with Windows applications. Like it's 90% of the app is working but 10% is not.

Like most third party AV. That's why that stuff has been a "no no" for years.

@jaredbusch said in So Windows 11??:

@dashrender said in So Windows 11??:

@siringo said in So Windows 11??:

@pete-s said in So Windows 11??:

@nadnerb said in So Windows 11??:

Not impressed. Have to replace my CPU (Ryzen 5 1600) if I want to upgrade.
Yeah yeah, TPM blah blah blah. Still not happy about it. I've only had the CPU for 3 years.

Granted I don't have to move until 2025 (WIN10 EOL) if I want to retain my hardware that long.
Just irritated that I can't upgrade straight away.

These requirements may not seem too strict, but having a look at the list of supported processors, you’ll notice that the 1st Gen AMD Ryzen CPUs aren’t supported, and the 2nd Gen Zen+ processors are a bare minimum on AMD’s end and the 8th Gen Kaby Lake-R is the least supported on Intel’s end. Keep in mind that although the OS will run on systems using older processors, it’s “not recommended”. Microsoft’s list of supported processors doesn’t make sense as there’s little to no difference between the 1st and 2nd Gen Ryzen processors. Similarly, the Kaby Lake-R (8th Gen Intel Core lineup) is essentially a rebranding of the 7th Gen offerings.

BBQ Sauce: https://www.hardwaretimes.com/windows-11-wont-support-1st-gen-amd-ryzen-processors-tpm-required/

More Dipping Sauces

Supported AMD CPUs: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/design/minimum/supported/windows-11-supported-AMD-processors Supported intal CPUs: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/design/minimum/supported/windows-11-supported-intal-processors

It's called planned obsolescence. It's not done for any technical reason whatsoever, so looking for what makes "sense" doesn't make sense.

This @Pete-S you're spot on. It's just about making more money. If the software is kept up to date security wise, why would anything ever need to be replaced/updated, but we all know that.

When's the release date for 11?

Oct 2021

Right is is simply Windows 10 21H2 with a new GUI and rebranded as Windows 11

As far as I've heard, they are releasing both - Windows 11 and Windows 10 21H2.

Cool, issue resolved.

https://www.techotopia.com/index.php/Dual_Booting_RHEL_with_Windows

Adding below thing to /etc/grub.d/40_custom was enough, all went good.

menuentry "Windows 10" {
set root=(hd0,1)
chainloader +1
}

An XPS with Ubuntu is very hard to beat for work. I used to have a setup like that. My needs changed lately and now is most efficient to run Win10/11, however, possibly 2nd quarter next year I'll be back to running Ubuntu mainly after I finish some Windows related projects.

@pete-s said in Anybody here running PeerTube?:

@scottalanmiller said in Anybody here running PeerTube?:

@pete-s said in Anybody here running PeerTube?:

@dashrender said in Anybody here running PeerTube?:

Huh - I love the idea of getting away from Google and their data mongering... but I don't see this being viable.

Isn't that the problem almost all open source projects have?

You need someone with resources to market it, pour money in it and polish it for mass consumption.

That's why linux on the desktop hasn't taken off and probably never will. Nobody is marketing it and nobody is going to - unless there is money to be made in some way.

PeerTube could become a thing among geeks open source advocates though.

The issue here is not related to the source but to a service.

PeerTube isn't a service. It's a self-hosted video server that can also federate content from other PeerTube servers.

So the network of PeerTube servers is decentralized and not subject to the whims of any one company. Like email. Or the www before companies started to build closed networks inside (Facebook etc).

it is a service, just like email is a service. But as you mentioned a decentralized one.

And that's the killer - why it won't ever have mass appeal on it's own.

Now as you mentioned if someone comes along, takes the open source, pours a moon worth of dollars into it, polishes it up, etc... and mass markets it to the public... they could make it appeal-able to the masses.
the question then becomes - how do they monetize it? Ads you say? well, then you're just becoming the next Youtube, collecting data because the advertisers demand it.

@krzykat This wouldn't have been that. Was just worth getting an RMA and starting fresh.

@dashrender said in Phishing rules versus poor translations:

Garage office getting an upgrade?

Customer site. The 5 year old Black & Decker unit they had died.

I've never setup anything manual/specific with IPv6 (and by manual, I've never setup DHCP on Windows server to hand out ULA).

I've only ever used the privately assigned IPv6 stuff internally, then let my router do NAT for both IPv4 and IPv6.

@pete-s said in Windows Terminal:

But Microsoft have been pretty consistent through the years about using "console" and not "terminal" for this kind of application.

True. They do always use some weird terminology that is very specifically something else but "not when Microsoft says it."

Would something like crackmapexec do the trick? I've started playing around with it to validate that some of our security configs are actually doing what they're supposed to and it can be used to dump user lists from a lot of the native windows locations. Not sure that it would get everything that you're looking for but "hacking" tools might be something to consider in addition to the typical bevy of PS and Windows commands.