How Do Such Big Gaps Get Missed in IT Education
-
@scottalanmiller said in How Do Such Big Gaps Get Missed in IT Education:
I agree. Computers? Boring. Oh, IT,that's the field for me. lol
I think he fell into it mostly by accident - If I recall correctly, he was working as a sales guy who learned how to do some commands, which turned into knowledge that was more valuable than than his sales job was.
-
Example:
Every company I have ever worked for already had a functional (more or less) domain with multiple domain controllers. I have never needed to setup my own domain, forest, subdomains, etc. I just recently had to delve into it and learned a lot, but I by no means know everything. Frankly, until I experience something from a lot of different angles I don't think I really know it. Most of my personal knowledge is conceptual but there is so much misinformation out there that before I joined ML I didn't know if what I was reading was correct. It sounded right, but I had no way of really knowing. Misinformation is what makes learning hard IMO. It forces me to need to forget information as well as retain information instead of fully concentrating on retaining it.
-
@wirestyle22 said in How Do Such Big Gaps Get Missed in IT Education:
Example:
Every company I have ever worked for already had a functional (more or less) domain with multiple domain controllers. I have never needed to setup my own domain, forest, subdomains, etc. I just recently had to delve into it and learned a lot, but I by no means know everything. Frankly, until I experience something from a lot of different angles I don't think I really know it. Most of my personal knowledge is conceptual but there is so much misinformation out there that before I joined ML I didn't know if what I was reading was correct. It sounded right, but I had no way of really knowing. Misinformation is what makes learning hard IMO. It forces me to need to forget information as well as retain information instead of fully concentrating on retaining it.
how does hearing it on ML help you know it's right?
-
@wirestyle22 said in How Do Such Big Gaps Get Missed in IT Education:
Example:
Every company I have ever worked for already had a functional (more or less) domain with multiple domain controllers. I have never needed to setup my own domain, forest, subdomains, etc. I just recently had to delve into it and learned a lot, but I by no means know everything. Frankly, until I experience something from a lot of different angles I don't think I really know it. Most of my personal knowledge is conceptual but there is so much misinformation out there that before I joined ML I didn't know if what I was reading was correct. It sounded right, but I had no way of really knowing. Misinformation is what makes learning hard IMO. It forces me to need to forget information as well as retain information instead of fully concentrating on retaining it.
What path got you to where you were, though? For Dash and I we went through some "formal" basic training on our own and that stuff was covered (well not AD, that didn't exist yet). What took you from "computers sound like a good career" to "running IT in a shop" is where the gap must be. In our experience there, the basics were covered.
-
@Dashrender said in How Do Such Big Gaps Get Missed in IT Education:
@wirestyle22 said in How Do Such Big Gaps Get Missed in IT Education:
Example:
Every company I have ever worked for already had a functional (more or less) domain with multiple domain controllers. I have never needed to setup my own domain, forest, subdomains, etc. I just recently had to delve into it and learned a lot, but I by no means know everything. Frankly, until I experience something from a lot of different angles I don't think I really know it. Most of my personal knowledge is conceptual but there is so much misinformation out there that before I joined ML I didn't know if what I was reading was correct. It sounded right, but I had no way of really knowing. Misinformation is what makes learning hard IMO. It forces me to need to forget information as well as retain information instead of fully concentrating on retaining it.
how does hearing it on ML help you know it's right?
because everyone corrects everyone here in an effort to make the information accurate. we heavily scrutinize each other in an effort to improve one another. Look at RAID on ML vs Spiceworks. That's a great example.
-
@scottalanmiller said in How Do Such Big Gaps Get Missed in IT Education:
@wirestyle22 said in How Do Such Big Gaps Get Missed in IT Education:
Example:
Every company I have ever worked for already had a functional (more or less) domain with multiple domain controllers. I have never needed to setup my own domain, forest, subdomains, etc. I just recently had to delve into it and learned a lot, but I by no means know everything. Frankly, until I experience something from a lot of different angles I don't think I really know it. Most of my personal knowledge is conceptual but there is so much misinformation out there that before I joined ML I didn't know if what I was reading was correct. It sounded right, but I had no way of really knowing. Misinformation is what makes learning hard IMO. It forces me to need to forget information as well as retain information instead of fully concentrating on retaining it.
What path got you to where you were, though? For Dash and I we went through some "formal" basic training on our own and that stuff was covered (well not AD, that didn't exist yet). What took you from "computers sound like a good career" to "running IT in a shop" is where the gap must be. In our experience there, the basics were covered.
Built my first PC at 12, always had an interest in it. At 18 I enrolled at BCSI and went through all of their courses but the owners of the school just stopped doing it one day and screwed a lot of people out of their education. Just took their money and ran essentially.
-
@wirestyle22 said in How Do Such Big Gaps Get Missed in IT Education:
@scottalanmiller said in How Do Such Big Gaps Get Missed in IT Education:
@wirestyle22 said in How Do Such Big Gaps Get Missed in IT Education:
Example:
Every company I have ever worked for already had a functional (more or less) domain with multiple domain controllers. I have never needed to setup my own domain, forest, subdomains, etc. I just recently had to delve into it and learned a lot, but I by no means know everything. Frankly, until I experience something from a lot of different angles I don't think I really know it. Most of my personal knowledge is conceptual but there is so much misinformation out there that before I joined ML I didn't know if what I was reading was correct. It sounded right, but I had no way of really knowing. Misinformation is what makes learning hard IMO. It forces me to need to forget information as well as retain information instead of fully concentrating on retaining it.
What path got you to where you were, though? For Dash and I we went through some "formal" basic training on our own and that stuff was covered (well not AD, that didn't exist yet). What took you from "computers sound like a good career" to "running IT in a shop" is where the gap must be. In our experience there, the basics were covered.
Built my first PC at 12, always had an interest in it. At 18 I enrolled at BCSI and went through all of their courses but the owners of the school just stopped doing it one day and screwed a lot of people out of their education. Just took their money and ran essentially.
That'll do it.
-
That can't be the NORMAL case, though.
-
@scottalanmiller It was in my area. This was the only school that taught this that was close enough for most people here. Luckily the local community college started hiring IT teachers and have courses now. For years they didn't though.
-
I think a lot of it also has to do with how broad the subject of IT actually is. There are so many areas and a lot of times folks tend to focus on areas -- not even intentionally some times.
Take me, for instance, I'm a software guy. I can load systems and make them sing pretty much any part you want. I can assemble them as well, but that is not my strong point.
My old man, however, can put one together blind folded with one hand behind his back while singing 70's music backwards. He can install and use an OS as an end-user, but he's lost on the actual inner workings of software.
-
Maybe we need an ML "How to Get Started in IT" guide
-
@scottalanmiller said in How Do Such Big Gaps Get Missed in IT Education:
Maybe we need an ML "How to Get Started in IT" guide
Or a "Things you should know BEFORE applying for your first IT Job...
Short list:
- What happens when you format a disk.
- What Virtualization does, and the 3 major players in the market.
-
A lot of the certs are not vendor neutral as well. If I got my CCNA I wouldn't have used it until now for instance and we're replacing our cisco switches in a month or two anyway.
-
@wirestyle22 said in How Do Such Big Gaps Get Missed in IT Education:
A lot of the certs are not vendor neutral as well. If I got my CCNA I wouldn't have used it until now for instance and we're replacing our cisco switches in a month or two anyway.
While you are right about that, I think that the technical certs that are more than just "entry level" type certifications will teach you concepts that directly translate to other vendors.
I actually did get my CCNA... and used it to work on a grand total of two Cisco switches that were retired about 6 months after I started that job, lol. But the concepts have enabled me to do a lot more than just cisco gear.
When going from one vendor to the next, it is just a matter of matching up terminology and looking up the commands for what you want to do.
Edit: I must emphasize that it is important to know and understand the concepts well!
-
@dafyre said in How Do Such Big Gaps Get Missed in IT Education:
@wirestyle22 said in How Do Such Big Gaps Get Missed in IT Education:
A lot of the certs are not vendor neutral as well. If I got my CCNA I wouldn't have used it until now for instance and we're replacing our cisco switches in a month or two anyway.
While you are right about that, I think that the technical certs that are more than just "entry level" type certifications will teach you concepts that directly translate to other vendors.
I actually did get my CCNA... and used it to work on a grand total of two Cisco switches that were retired about 6 months after I started that job, lol. But the concepts have enabled me to do a lot more than just cisco gear.
When going from one vendor to the next, it is just a matter of matching up terminology and looking up the commands for what you want to do.
Edit: I must emphasize that it is important to know and understand the concepts well!
Correct. If you actually learn the material, it will generally apply across the board with only minor syntax differences.
L3 routing works the same on any manufacturers gear. They may do a few special things with commands or use their own syntax, but if you understand L3, you can work on anything.
-
@wirestyle22 said in How Do Such Big Gaps Get Missed in IT Education:
@Dashrender said in How Do Such Big Gaps Get Missed in IT Education:
@wirestyle22 said in How Do Such Big Gaps Get Missed in IT Education:
Example:
Every company I have ever worked for already had a functional (more or less) domain with multiple domain controllers. I have never needed to setup my own domain, forest, subdomains, etc. I just recently had to delve into it and learned a lot, but I by no means know everything. Frankly, until I experience something from a lot of different angles I don't think I really know it. Most of my personal knowledge is conceptual but there is so much misinformation out there that before I joined ML I didn't know if what I was reading was correct. It sounded right, but I had no way of really knowing. Misinformation is what makes learning hard IMO. It forces me to need to forget information as well as retain information instead of fully concentrating on retaining it.
how does hearing it on ML help you know it's right?
because everyone corrects everyone here in an effort to make the information accurate. we heavily scrutinize each other in an effort to improve one another. Look at RAID on ML vs Spiceworks. That's a great example.
I haven't been on SW as much lately - Is Scott not correcting whatever wrong over there he finds? Or are you saying his voice is lost in a sea of other garbage and is basically getting lost in the noise?
-
@wirestyle22 said in How Do Such Big Gaps Get Missed in IT Education:
@scottalanmiller It was in my area. This was the only school that taught this that was close enough for most people here. Luckily the local community college started hiring IT teachers and have courses now. For years they didn't though.
Sure, but just because the schools wheren't there didn't prevent people from buying books like Scott and I did. No formal schooling for either of us, at least not at the start.
-
@Dashrender said in How Do Such Big Gaps Get Missed in IT Education:
@wirestyle22 said in How Do Such Big Gaps Get Missed in IT Education:
@Dashrender said in How Do Such Big Gaps Get Missed in IT Education:
@wirestyle22 said in How Do Such Big Gaps Get Missed in IT Education:
Example:
Every company I have ever worked for already had a functional (more or less) domain with multiple domain controllers. I have never needed to setup my own domain, forest, subdomains, etc. I just recently had to delve into it and learned a lot, but I by no means know everything. Frankly, until I experience something from a lot of different angles I don't think I really know it. Most of my personal knowledge is conceptual but there is so much misinformation out there that before I joined ML I didn't know if what I was reading was correct. It sounded right, but I had no way of really knowing. Misinformation is what makes learning hard IMO. It forces me to need to forget information as well as retain information instead of fully concentrating on retaining it.
how does hearing it on ML help you know it's right?
because everyone corrects everyone here in an effort to make the information accurate. we heavily scrutinize each other in an effort to improve one another. Look at RAID on ML vs Spiceworks. That's a great example.
I haven't been on SW as much lately - Is Scott not correcting whatever wrong over there he finds? Or are you saying his voice is lost in a sea of other garbage and is basically getting lost in the noise?
I would say his voice is lost in the sea of other garbage and people muting him, lol.
I was on SW for a couple of years before I met Scott, and actually directly messaged him a question, I think.
-
@scottalanmiller said in How Do Such Big Gaps Get Missed in IT Education:
Maybe we need an ML "How to Get Started in IT" guide
This could easily exceed the Linux How To guide.
-
@JaredBusch said in How Do Such Big Gaps Get Missed in IT Education:
@dafyre said in How Do Such Big Gaps Get Missed in IT Education:
@wirestyle22 said in How Do Such Big Gaps Get Missed in IT Education:
A lot of the certs are not vendor neutral as well. If I got my CCNA I wouldn't have used it until now for instance and we're replacing our cisco switches in a month or two anyway.
While you are right about that, I think that the technical certs that are more than just "entry level" type certifications will teach you concepts that directly translate to other vendors.
I actually did get my CCNA... and used it to work on a grand total of two Cisco switches that were retired about 6 months after I started that job, lol. But the concepts have enabled me to do a lot more than just cisco gear.
When going from one vendor to the next, it is just a matter of matching up terminology and looking up the commands for what you want to do.
Edit: I must emphasize that it is important to know and understand the concepts well!
Correct. If you actually learn the material, it will generally apply across the board with only minor syntax differences.
L3 routing works the same on any manufacturers gear. They may do a few special things with commands or use their own syntax, but if you understand L3, you can work on anything.
Especially the CCNA. As you move up the certs chart, it becomes more vendor specific. Towards the bottom it is more general.
