ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Commercial Desktops vs. Whiteboxes

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    desktop
    87 Posts 11 Posters 24.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller @Mike Ralston
      last edited by

      @Mike-Ralston said:

      @scottalanmiller Entirely misinformation. Integrated GPU is more powerful than anyone in NTG, other than me, is currently running, in that Hadron chassis. If you want those kinds of things, we're talking more like $600-$1000 or beyond. What's the target budget here?

      It's not. Not at all. The AMD A series is super underpowered. It's a CPU and GPU in a single die with each getting some of the cores for their tasks. Not up to anything but basic web surfing usage. No idea why you think this but this is like the confusion around the power in ARM CPUs. These just aren't powerful enough to use.

      Mike RalstonM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Mike RalstonM
        Mike Ralston @scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        @scottalanmiller What are you talking about??? I used an APU for around a year, and it was the A10 - 5700. Worked fine for heavy gaming use, at medium to high settings. Could handle dozens of webpages, and multiple background tasks including Skype and Skyrim, all at the same time. It's much more powerful than the solution that @Minion-Queen uses, and she uses a ton of tasks all at once. Ask her.

        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @Mike Ralston
          last edited by

          @Mike-Ralston said:

          I used an APU for around a year, and it was the A10 - 5700. .... It's much more powerful than the solution that @Minion-Queen uses, and she uses a ton of tasks all at once.

          Which one is she using? The A10 is a quad core, so that makes sense that a new quad core would outperform the older triple cores (not older because they are triple, they are actually much older.) But the A6 is only dual core, that's really low.

          What is the GPU equivalent to in NVidia, roughly?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            It didn't score too hot on performance.

            http://www.futuremark.com/hardware/cpu/AMD+A10-5800K/review

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              Was thinking something closer to....

              http://www.amazon.com/AMD-Phenom-1035T-2-60GHz-Processor/dp/B005T288QW/ref=sr_1_13?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1416849526&sr=1-13&keywords=amd+phenom+ii+x6

              Mike RalstonM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                But the A10 does save a ton of money, I see lots of value there. If it is really blowing away the normal desktop performance. What does it compare well to?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  Looking at this one...

                  http://pcpartpicker.com/p/QKGsjX

                  If we remove the optical drive (no need for that) and replace the HD with an SSD maybe it makes sense.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Mike RalstonM
                    Mike Ralston @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    @scottalanmiller said:

                    Was thinking something closer to....

                    http://www.amazon.com/AMD-Phenom-1035T-2-60GHz-Processor/dp/B005T288QW/ref=sr_1_13?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1416849526&sr=1-13&keywords=amd+phenom+ii+x6

                    http://cpuboss.com/cpus/AMD-Phenom-II-X6-1035T-vs-AMD-A10-5800K

                    The 5800K is a faster CPU than that in every way. And for comparing it to an Nvidia GPU... Hard to say, as the APU depends on Southbridge and RAM speed and amount quite heavily... A tad slower than a GTX 550, I would say.

                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      When you are using the A10, does your OS see all four cores? Someone had one in SW and they only saw half of their cores.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @Mike Ralston
                        last edited by

                        @Mike-Ralston said:

                        http://cpuboss.com/cpus/AMD-Phenom-II-X6-1035T-vs-AMD-A10-5800K

                        The 5800K is a faster CPU than that in every way.

                        Well no, that link specifically put the X6 as faster in performance. The A series was only faster in single threaded operations, as would be expected. That link uses overclocking as a determination for overall winner. So that link actually says to me, quite clearly, that the X6 is faster for business use based on whatever measuring tool that they used. However, it still might not be a great value if the price isn't good. But faster, it clearly is, when moving beyond single threaded workloads. And for business use, effectively everything is heavily threaded.

                        Mike RalstonM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          a10x6perf.png

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Mike RalstonM
                            Mike Ralston @scottalanmiller
                            last edited by Mike Ralston

                            @scottalanmiller That site is based around gaming performance, business use is so much lighter than that. Unless you're planning on having employees doing serious gaming, or multiple VM's at once, anything more than this is complete over-kill... I guess the best thing for me to ask is this: WHAT do you want these machines to do, and at what price point?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Minion QueenM
                              Minion Queen
                              last edited by

                              I am running an AMD-FX 4100 Quadcore. It runs great for me. For instance right now I have 10 Explorer pages open, 5 Chrome and 4 Firefox (which keeps crashing). Outlook, Lync and Skype. And am using ITunes to listen to music. With no issues at all.

                              Mike RalstonM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • Mike RalstonM
                                Mike Ralston @Minion Queen
                                last edited by

                                @Minion-Queen And what CPU usage are you at?

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • Minion QueenM
                                  Minion Queen
                                  last edited by

                                  20% right now

                                  Mike RalstonM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • Mike RalstonM
                                    Mike Ralston @Minion Queen
                                    last edited by

                                    @Minion-Queen Only having 8GB of RAM (the standard recommended amount) is more of a bottleneck than the CPU. You're close to 60% RAM usage, right?

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • Minion QueenM
                                      Minion Queen
                                      last edited by

                                      75% RAM usage.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • scottalanmillerS
                                        scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by

                                        How much more to spec at 16GB?

                                        Mike RalstonM 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • Mike RalstonM
                                          Mike Ralston @scottalanmiller
                                          last edited by Mike Ralston

                                          @scottalanmiller 8GB is enough. The point I was making is that those CPU's are more than enough. But, I can get 16GB for between $150-$200.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • Mike RalstonM
                                            Mike Ralston @scottalanmiller
                                            last edited by

                                            @scottalanmiller What do you want these machines to do, and at what price point?

                                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 2 / 5
                                            • First post
                                              Last post