ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Comcast Service So Bad They Have to Threaten Customers

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    comcast
    13 Posts 7 Posters 2.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      In the US the telco providers are nearly always favoured. There is very little consumer protection.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • thanksajdotcomT
        thanksajdotcom
        last edited by

        Wow...that sucks on so many levels...

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ?
          A Former User
          last edited by

          Yep, considering utility providers have to pay the government localities fees in order to basically be a legalized monopoly in the US - They are usually favored. I've heard some areas of Texas are now doing it deregulated meaning any service provider can serve anywhere the chose instead of just when they win the bid with the locality like everywhere else. But they put laws in place to stop that from happening further...

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • NicN
            Nic
            last edited by

            right now it's a "he said, she said" situation - unless Comcast releases the recordings.

            JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • JaredBuschJ
              JaredBusch @Nic
              last edited by

              @Nic said:

              right now it's a "he said, she said" situation - unless Comcast releases the recordings.

              While this is true, I do agree with one thing posted about this. It should never have gotten that far anyway. All of the interactions prior to that are really, really, really bad.

              NicN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • NicN
                Nic @JaredBusch
                last edited by

                @JaredBusch agreed - they shouldn't have screwed the pooch that badly. As some have pointed out in the reddit thread on it, even if he did threaten to sic his company on them, their giving out customer data is a violation of privacy laws.

                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @Nic
                  last edited by

                  @Nic said:

                  @JaredBusch agreed - they shouldn't have screwed the pooch that badly. As some have pointed out in the reddit thread on it, even if he did threaten to sic his company on them, their giving out customer data is a violation of privacy laws.

                  Damn companies handing out private data!

                  ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • ?
                    A Former User @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by A Former User

                    @scottalanmiller said:

                    @Nic said:

                    @JaredBusch agreed - they shouldn't have screwed the pooch that badly. As some have pointed out in the reddit thread on it, even if he did threaten to sic his company on them, their giving out customer data is a violation of privacy laws.

                    Damn companies handing out private data!

                    But do privacy laws protect what you say in a call (that may be monitored or recorded)? I don't think so.

                    NicN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • NicN
                      Nic @A Former User
                      last edited by

                      @thecreativeone91 They protect against the release of any personal information:
                      http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/551

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • PSX_DefectorP
                        PSX_Defector
                        last edited by

                        You heard it first here, calling bullshit.

                        Consumerist articles tend to be on the rather self serving side. Beside the fact that Comcast couldn't give two shits about someone, let alone enough to actively seek out folks and find out where they work. As was stated in the article, why would Comcast single out this individual when they get calls every single day of "I'm a lawyer at a big firm" or "I'm the CEO of important company".

                        Smells like bullshit to me.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • 1 / 1
                        • First post
                          Last post