ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Securing Linux File Servers

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    linuxlinux hardeningsecurityfile server
    35 Posts 8 Posters 5.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • wirestyle22W
      wirestyle22 @Dashrender
      last edited by

      @Dashrender said in Securing Linux File Servers:

      @wirestyle22 said in Securing Linux File Servers:

      @Dashrender You're confusing me man. There is an employee in medical records already. Instead of the company being paid to scan the stuff, we would do the initial project and then it would be maintained over time by her. It equates to 5 scans a day. I don't understand where the complication is here?

      5 scans a day? since the beginning? or did it drop to this number recently?

      It's been this the entire time. The issue is they are charging for one huge project a year, an external hard drive and some cloud storage. 9k+ a year.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • V
        Veet
        last edited by

        Hi,

        Perhaps I'm missing something, or have not read the entire thread properly, but why would a NAS not work over here ? Unless, the server would be performing some other function, apart from acting as a File Server ... Most NAS boxes too use Linux-based operating systems...

        wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • wirestyle22W
          wirestyle22 @Veet
          last edited by

          @Veet said in Securing Linux File Servers:

          Hi,

          Perhaps I'm missing something, or have not read the entire thread properly, but why would a NAS not work over here ? Unless, the server would be performing some other function, apart from acting as a File Server ... Most NAS boxes too use Linux-based operating systems...

          My company had some bad experiences with NAS and as a result are very close minded about them. This is my way around that.

          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @wirestyle22
            last edited by

            @wirestyle22 said in Securing Linux File Servers:

            @Veet said in Securing Linux File Servers:

            Hi,

            Perhaps I'm missing something, or have not read the entire thread properly, but why would a NAS not work over here ? Unless, the server would be performing some other function, apart from acting as a File Server ... Most NAS boxes too use Linux-based operating systems...

            My company had some bad experiences with NAS and as a result are very close minded about them. This is my way around that.

            Call it a file server. Problem solved.

            dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • dafyreD
              dafyre @scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              @scottalanmiller said in Securing Linux File Servers:

              @wirestyle22 said in Securing Linux File Servers:

              @Veet said in Securing Linux File Servers:

              Hi,

              Perhaps I'm missing something, or have not read the entire thread properly, but why would a NAS not work over here ? Unless, the server would be performing some other function, apart from acting as a File Server ... Most NAS boxes too use Linux-based operating systems...

              My company had some bad experiences with NAS and as a result are very close minded about them. This is my way around that.

              Call it a file server. Problem solved.

              And just back it up to hard drives with a network card attached. (Don't call it a NAS, lol).

              wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • wirestyle22W
                wirestyle22 @dafyre
                last edited by

                I guess I could do that but I have a server I can re-purpose for this. It would be really simple 😕

                dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • wirestyle22W
                  wirestyle22
                  last edited by

                  Any NAS recommendations? I'd say 4 HD Max w/ raid 10. Might as well do it right.

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @wirestyle22
                    last edited by

                    @wirestyle22 said in Securing Linux File Servers:

                    Any NAS recommendations? I'd say 4 HD Max w/ raid 10. Might as well do it right.

                    One without NAS in its name, like Synology or ioSafe.

                    wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • wirestyle22W
                      wirestyle22 @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller Nothing stands out between them?

                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • dafyreD
                        dafyre @wirestyle22
                        last edited by

                        @wirestyle22 said in Securing Linux File Servers:

                        I guess I could do that but I have a server I can re-purpose for this. It would be really simple 😕

                        You've got a server to repurpose for holding the scanned data... But do you also have a server that can be repurposed to hold the backups of said data?

                        wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @wirestyle22
                          last edited by

                          @wirestyle22 said in Securing Linux File Servers:

                          @scottalanmiller Nothing stands out between them?

                          ioSafe uses Synology under the hood. So no. LOL

                          wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • wirestyle22W
                            wirestyle22 @dafyre
                            last edited by

                            @dafyre said in Securing Linux File Servers:

                            @wirestyle22 said in Securing Linux File Servers:

                            I guess I could do that but I have a server I can re-purpose for this. It would be really simple 😕

                            You've got a server to repurpose for holding the scanned data... But do you also have a server that can be repurposed to hold the backups of said data?

                            Yes. Our backup servers are at 25% utilization

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • wirestyle22W
                              wirestyle22 @scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              @scottalanmiller said in Securing Linux File Servers:

                              @wirestyle22 said in Securing Linux File Servers:

                              @scottalanmiller Nothing stands out between them?

                              ioSafe uses Synology under the hood. So no. LOL

                              So it's like HP vs. Canon. Got it.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • 1
                              • 2
                              • 2 / 2
                              • First post
                                Last post