@Hubtech Thanks for the assist.

@g.jacobse said:

SharePoint Work flows? It's unlikely since we haven't delved that far yet...

InfoPath is really a tool primarily for getting data into SharePoint. So if getting data into SharePoint's database so that you can manipulate, store and workflow it then InfoPath is really good. If your goal is something else, then it just generates XML. If you are building your own XML parsing system then that is great. If not, probably not the tool for you.

Thanks for all of the advice...we found that we needed some licenses and we purchased them and are about to send in the letter.

Thanks...
Brian

I've been hearing a lot about Banana Pi lately. I've been told it's basically just a more powerful Raspberry Pi.
http://www.bananapi.org/p/product.html

Once your network is set up, AD integration would be what you do next so that any and all account details are tied to it. But if you don't have AD, it doesn't matter.

Note that this IS a rollup, not a patch itself...

This November update rollup also includes all previous updates since our last image update in April 2014. This is a convenient single step to bring Windows clients and servers up to date.

Sorry, never touched one either.

Cool!

@bbiAngie said:

I am running an phenom 1100T at work and it works very well. Great processor
At home I have an FX-8350 and I love it. I tend to be an AMD fangirl but that's because for the money, I think they are great. Yes, I can agree that Intel makes a good processor but for the money, Ill chose AMD hands down every single time.

Nailed it right there. AMD is king of the $150 or less CPU market.
Have to say though, the new Intel G3258 is tempting @ $70 (unlocked dual core, people OC to ~4ghz+ for gaming)
http://ark.intel.com/products/82723/Intel-Pentium-Processor-G3258-3M-Cache-3_20-GHz

@JaredBusch said:

@Carnival-Boy said:

I know. I've got the Pro models.

This was going to be the one thing I brought up, but you got it handled.

I personally do not like NetGear Switches after too many crappy experiences with managing the "Smart" switches.

They do generally work well if you do not need to get into the configuration and I have upgraded the firmware in many of them over the years without any problems.

I have been buying the HP 1910 line lately, but I will be giving the Ubiquiti line a shot next time I go for a model needing PoE.

That's odd, I've always had an amazing experience with Netgear switches. Their smart line is actually a really good value for the low-end/SMB market.

Although I agree, I am going to see about getting one of the Ubiquiti switches in the future.

@IRJ The functionality is supposed to be coming soon where you won't need these third party work arounds. When the convergence happens, it will be a pretty sweet platform.

@JaredBusch said:

That certainly is not a solution, that is a work around. Did they tell you what else may be affected by this change? What other Windows systems may now have problems because of it.

That's all the information I found online.

@NetworkNerd Yeah!

@ambarishrh Super jealous of your funding there! If it were my $$$$ I'd get myself a nice Cleo or Sager or other custom setup. You can get just an insane machine for that money. http://www.xoticpc.com/

@g.jacobse said:

While I've not spoke to anyone about it, it seems impractical to have both PSUs plugged into the same UPS, so why not split them and then identify them by color.

Definitely impractical. Not 100% wasted as it does protect against PSU failure, still. But it does not leverage the degree of protection that you should have.

@NetworkNerd said:

We're upgrading from Epicor 9 to 10 and implementing RemoteApp for users at our remote sites at the same time. Woohoo!

That's 5 new servers on Server 2012 (1 SQL 2012, 3 Epicor application servers, and 1 RDS server).

WOOHOO!

Very nice. that's a great tool!!

@scottalanmiller said:

I think very few people deploy Sharepoint in house anymore.

I have entire customer's sites hosted within Sharepoint. Not the usual collaboration stuff, straight up consumer level sites. Like, huge company, 500 sites a host level. We had a lot of other customers use Sharepoint to extend their site's abilities.

For a simple share, yeah, go O365. Extend the functionality to other stuff, you need a local install.

Well in a hosted system you don't have analogue lines so that isn't a factor for us.