Instructional videos for people who mistake bidets for toilets.
Posts
-
RE: High-tech toilet seats: no hands or paper requiredposted in Water Closet
-
RE: High-tech toilet seats: no hands or paper requiredposted in Water Closet
We need someone to get one and report back to us.
-
RE: High-tech toilet seats: no hands or paper requiredposted in Water Closet
@Nic said:
I would love bidets to take off in the US. Or hi-tech combo toilets. Bathrooms should go paperless!
Me too. Another thing that I prefer about Europe.
-
RE: High-tech toilet seats: no hands or paper requiredposted in Water Closet
@Dashrender said:
I can attest to this, Scott is right, it's pretty common in hotels to see the foot washing station right next to the toilet. Seems weird to me to have a dedicated sink for your feet
But when sandals are the norm....Sandals are common and it is warm and dusty.
-
RE: High-tech toilet seats: no hands or paper requiredposted in Water Closet
@Joyfano said:
@scottalanmiller so they really have a basin for washing feet..
Yes. Very common practice in Italy. That's why Italian bidets spray out and not up like French ones.
-
RE: Postfix as Smarthostposted in IT Discussion
@NetworkNerd said:
I'll always have a soft spot in my heart for Zimbra, but I completely understand preferring not to use it for this.
Me too. Although partially because it is built on Postfix. It's just so heavy for this though.
-
RE: Postfix as Smarthostposted in IT Discussion
@Dashrender said:
why aren't you using O365 to relay your text messages?
O365 is not a relay. It's an end point.
-
RE: Today In Closetposted in Water Closet
@Nic said:
To @joyfano - Texas is only the other side of the world from Colorado in terms of attitudes

Which is odd as Colorado used to be part of Texas!
-
RE: High-tech toilet seats: no hands or paper requiredposted in Water Closet
@ajstringham said:
@scottalanmiller o.0 Does poo not enter and leave from it?
LMAO. No. It's a wash basin. It goes next to a toilet, not instead of.
-
RE: The New Site Is Up!posted in News
@Bob-Beatty said:
I'm glad to be here - you guys ok if I invite a few to join this club?
As many as you can!
-
RE: Anyone else laughing about the title of this board?posted in Water Closet
@ajstringham said:
@scottalanmiller What show was that? Is that Reading Rainbow?
Not a show, although good guess (Rochestarians unite!!) This is actually a public service announcement.
-
RE: High-tech toilet seats: no hands or paper requiredposted in Water Closet
@ajstringham said:
@scottalanmiller Different word, same thing.
I think you are confused. A bidet is not a toilet. This is why all Americans need to travel more. If you did what you plan to do in there people would be horrified. That's what Italians use to wash their feet!!
-
RE: Elio Fuel Efficient Carsposted in Water Closet
I'm a big guy (more girth than height sadly) but surprisingly I fit in tiny cars better than most people. I drive a Chevy Spark today and it is huge for me. My RX7 is super comfy.
-
RE: Postfix as Smarthostposted in IT Discussion
We are planning on cloud hosting on IaaS, Rackspace I'm sure. Although that shouldn't be a factor outside of a point of interest. Will be CentOS 6 underneath.
-
Postfix as Smarthostposted in IT Discussion
Has anyone worked with building their own smarthost? We are looking to build one using Postfix on Linux to handle many servers that need a smarthost to relay on their behalf. I've built many Postfix email systems before but not a dedicated smarthost. Anyone have any guidance? This is all for internal use, not for reselling or anything and it doesn't need to be doing spam filtering or anything like that as it is pure text emails being sent for alerts and such. Very basic. We could use Zimbra but seems way to heavy when we could have a tiny, tiny system just doing Postfix alone.
-
RE: Server Consolidationposted in IT Discussion
I would be loathe to deploy on site Exchange today, especially for someone new, though. Why not put him on Office 365?
-
RE: Server Consolidationposted in IT Discussion
The cost of the license might be high enough to make a new server and consolidation make sense. There is SO little memory in those that they are kind of silly as they are. Needing an OS license isn't the end of the world, servers are normally sold without them. So in their current state they are just servers without Windows. No reason not to use them for Linux, FreeBSD, etc.