ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Topics
    2. scottalanmiller
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 170
    • Followers 168
    • Topics 3,472
    • Posts 151,750
    • Groups 1

    Posts

    Recent Best Controversial
    • RE: Not much luck with Linux Distro's

      @Obsolesce said in Not much luck with Linux Distro's:

      @CCWTech gotcha.

      Yeah I've been on Mac the last few months. Still trying to learn to like it, there's a lot of minor annoyances or quirks and quality of life differences that make it harder to get used to. I still prefer Ubuntu over MacOS for work, and Win11 strictly for personal use.

      Two years on MacOS and my opinion is... it's nowhere near the polish of Ubuntu. Ubuntu is SO much better. Every little task is faster, easier and more obvious on Ubuntu. And everything looks better. MacOS is generally stable, but not completely.

      The hardware is fantastic to the point that I put up with it and am thrilled with how well it works. I just wish Ubuntu ran on this hardware 🙂 And that I could get Final Cut Pro on ubuntu.

      posted in IT Discussion
      scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
    • RE: Not much luck with Linux Distro's

      @CCWTech said in Not much luck with Linux Distro's:

      @Obsolesce said in Not much luck with Linux Distro's:

      @CCWTech gotcha.

      Yeah I've been on Mac the last few months. Still trying to learn to like it, there are a lot of minor annoyances or quirks and quality-of-life differences that make it harder to get used to. I still prefer Ubuntu over MacOS for work, and Win11 strictly for personal use.

      Not sure what changed, and maybe I am speaking too soon, but after trying Nobara I reinstalled Fedora, and no crashes in 2 days...

      Could just be that tehre is a new driver since then.

      posted in IT Discussion
      scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
    • RE: Practical RAID Decision Making

      @scottalanmiller said in Practical RAID Decision Making:

      The latest on the StorageCraft Blog from me: Practical RAID Decision Making. A whole lot less on the nitty, gritty details and a lot of practical, high level thinking to guide you to quick, simple decision making around spindle-based RAID levels.

      I just found this link and discovered that ArcServe bought StorageCraft and removed my writing credits violating my author agreement!

      posted in Self Promotion
      scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
    • RE: Don't ya just love Windows - sleep timeout during login

      For later when people find this...

      https://mangolassi.it/topic/18166/windows-10-goes-to-sleep-outside-listed-sleep-times/53

      posted in IT Discussion
      scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
    • RE: Windows 10 goes to sleep outside listed sleep times

      @Dashrender nice

      posted in IT Discussion
      scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
    • RE: Is the domain .Local a real problem in a private lan that has no public facing services?

      @JasGot said in Is the domain .Local a real problem in a private lan that has no public facing services?:

      @scottalanmiller said in Is the domain .Local a real problem in a private lan that has no public facing services?:

      Nothing in the Windows world uses it. Mac uses it, and some isolated Linux stuff. Really minor in most cases.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.local

      That what I had read also. Thanks. They are keeping .local during the transition! 🙂

      If it causes any problems (unlikely), there are workarounds too. It's never a show stopper.

      posted in IT Discussion
      scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
    • RE: Migrate VMWare VMs to ProxMox

      @WLS-ITGuy Typically we use the time to rebuild. Any VM should, in theory, be quick and easy to rebuild. If it isn't, it's the perfect time to make it so.

      If you absolutely have to convert rather than move through application migration, then there are disk conversation tools that change the format. There's very little needed for the migration.

      posted in IT Discussion
      scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
    • RE: ZFS Pool Online but Cannot Import

      @EddieJennings said in ZFS Pool Online but Cannot Import:

      You may want to seek out Jim Salter's content concerning ZFS. This is the community he's started since leaving the ZFS subreddit.

      https://discourse.practicalzfs.com/

      Like everywhere else, not one single thing similar to this issue 😞

      posted in IT Discussion
      scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
    • RE: Is the domain .Local a real problem in a private lan that has no public facing services?

      Nothing in the Windows world uses it. Mac uses it, and some isolated Linux stuff. Really minor in most cases.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.local

      posted in IT Discussion
      scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
    • RE: Is the domain .Local a real problem in a private lan that has no public facing services?

      @JasGot no, it's fine. Almost nothing ever uses that and it was best practice for a long time.

      posted in IT Discussion
      scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
    • RE: ZFS Pool Online but Cannot Import

      Just a quick update. We are imaging the drives, converting the images to qcow2, mounting to an Ubuntu desktop and UFS Explorer is, so far, able to see the data in them. Not ideal, but it's working so far.

      https://www.ufsexplorer.com/articles/how-to/recover-data-zfs-volume/

      posted in IT Discussion
      scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
    • RE: What Are You Doing Right Now

      hating ZFS more and more each day, lol

      posted in Water Closet
      scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
    • RE: Not much luck with Linux Distro's

      @IThomeboy80 said in Not much luck with Linux Distro's:

      You may want to go with other Linux distros (i.e. Ubuntu or Alma Linux)

      Ubuntu is what he started with.

      Alma isn't for desktop use (or IMHO production use of any kind. It's an LTS only kludge for bad software shops.)

      posted in IT Discussion
      scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
    • RE: ZFS Pool Online but Cannot Import

      @travisdh1 said in ZFS Pool Online but Cannot Import:

      @scottalanmiller said in ZFS Pool Online but Cannot Import:

      One big thing we've learned about ZFS risks is that it forces a situation where we are dealing with enormous pools of block data in order to do anything and the ability to copy, image, move, backup and so forth is heavily curtailed by the fact that we are forced to work at the array level before ZFS merges the RAID, LVM and filesystem layers together into a single monolith that, if it fails, leaves you so dramatically exposed.

      Yep. Just because LVM and MD are separate things, that's not necessarily a bad thing. Especially if you've got devices that can change where they are in the /dev system.

      Really, it's a very important good thing. ZFS merging that all together adds so much confusion and risk exposure, it's nuts. There is a reason that no production storage ever has done that.

      posted in IT Discussion
      scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
    • RE: ZFS Pool Online but Cannot Import

      One big thing we've learned about ZFS risks is that it forces a situation where we are dealing with enormous pools of block data in order to do anything and the ability to copy, image, move, backup and so forth is heavily curtailed by the fact that we are forced to work at the array level before ZFS merges the RAID, LVM and filesystem layers together into a single monolith that, if it fails, leaves you so dramatically exposed.

      posted in IT Discussion
      scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
    • RE: ZFS Pool Online but Cannot Import

      Current status... getting additional drives mounted so that we can take block level images of these devices so that we can more safely experiment.

      posted in IT Discussion
      scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
    • RE: ZFS Pool Online but Cannot Import

      Some useful nuggets of info from this link..

      https://serverfault.com/questions/656073/zfs-pool-reports-a-missing-device-but-it-is-not-missing

      This bit from "Jim" in 2020 is super useful for background...


      I know this is a five year-old question, and your immediate problem was solved. But this is one of the few specific search results that come up in a web search about missing ZFS devices (at least the keywords I used), and it might help others to know this:

      This specific problem of devices going "missing", is a known problem with ZFS on Linux. (Specifically on Linux.) The problem, I believe, is two-fold, and although the ZOL team could themselves fix it (probably with a lot of work), it's not entirely a ZOL problem:

      • While no OS has a perfectly stable way of referring to devices, for this specific use case, Linux is a little worse than, say, Illumos, BSD, or Solaris. Sure, we have device IDs, GUIDs, and even better--the newer 'WWN' standard. But the problem is, some storage controllers--notably some USB (v3 and 4) controllers, eSATA, and others, as well as many types of consumer-grade external enclosures--either can't always see those, or worse, don't pass them through to the OS. Merely plugging a cable into the "wrong" port of an external enclosure can trigger this problem in ZFS, and there's no getting around it.

      • ZOL for some reason can't pick up that the disks do actually exist and are visible to the OS, just not at any of the previous locations ZFS knew before (e.g. /dev, /dev/disk/by-id, by-path, by-guid, etc.) Or the one specific previous location, more to the point. Even if you do a proper zpool export before moving anything around. This is particularly frustrating about ZOL or ZFS in particular. (I remember this problem even on Solaris, but granted that was a significantly older version of ZFS that would lose the entire pool if the ZIL went missing...which I lost everything once to [but had backups].)

      The obvious workaround is to not use consumer-grade hardware with ZFS, especially consumer-grade external enclosures that use some consumer-level protocol like USB, Firewire, eSATA, etc. (External SAS should be fine.)

      That specifically--consumer grade external enclosures--has caused me unending headaches. While I did occasionally have this specific problem with slightly more "enterprise"-grade LSI SAS controllers and rackmount chassis with a 5x4 bay, moving to a more portable solution with three external bays pretty much unleashed hell. Thankfully my array is a stripe of three-way mirrors, because at one point it literally lost track of 8 drives (out of 12 total), and the only solution was to resilver them. (Which was mostly reads at GBs/s so at least it didn't take days or weeks.)

      So I don't know what the long-term solution is. I wouldn't blame the volunteers working on this mountain of code, if they felt that covering all the edge cases of consumer-grade hardware, for Linux specifically, was out of scope.

      But I think that if ZFS did a more exhaustive search of metadata that ZFS manages itself on each disk, would fix many related problems. (Btrfs, for example, doesn't suffer from this problem at all. I can move stuff around willy-nilly completely at random, and it has never once complained. Granted, Btrfs has other shortcomings compared to ZFS (the list of pros and cons is endless), and it's also native Linux--but it at least goes to show that the problem can, in theory, be solved, at least on Linux, specifically by the software itself.

      I've cobbled together a workaround to this problem, and I've now implemented on all my ZFS arrays, even at work, even on enterprise hardware:

      • Turn the external enclosures off, so that ZFS doesn't automatically import the pool. (It is frustrating that there still seems to be no way to tell ZFS not to do this. Renaming the cachefile or setting it to "none" doesn't work. Even without the addressing problems, I almost never want the pools to auto-mount but would rather an automatic script do it.)

      • Once the system is up and settled down, then turn on the external enclosures.

      • Run a script that exports and imports the pool a few times in a row (frustratingly sometimes necessary for it to see even legit minor changes). The most important thing here, is to import in read-only mode to avoid an automatic resilver kicking off.

      • The script then shows the user the output of zpool status of the read-only pool, and prompt the user if it's OK to go ahead and import in full read-write mode.

      Doing this has saved me (or my data) countless times. Usually it means I have to move drives and/or usually just cables around, until the addressing gets back to where it was. It also provides me with the opportunity to try different addressing methods with the -d switch. Some combination of that, and changing cables/locations, has solved the problem a few times.

      In my particular case, mounting with -d /dev/disk/by-path is usually the optimal choice. Because my former favorite, -d /dev/disk/by-id is actually fairly unreliable with my current setup. Usually a whole bay of drives are simply missing entirely from the /dev/disk/by-id directory. (And in this case it's hard to blame even Linux. It's just a wonky setup that further aggravates the existing shortcomings previously noted.)

      Sure, it means the server can't be relied upon to come up automatically without manual intervention. But considering 1) it runs full-time on a big battery backup, 2) I've knowingly made that tradeoff for the benefit of being able to use consumer-grade hardware that doesn't require two people and a dolly to move... that's an OK tradeoff.

      posted in IT Discussion
      scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
    • ZFS Pool Online but Cannot Import

      We have a ZFS pool from a ProxMox server that died (not an install that we did.) There is no backup (not an environment we set up.) The drives didn't fail, they are clean and healthy. We moved the drives to another host and they show up fine. Everything registers fine. We do an import and we can see the pool to import but when we import it we get "one or more devices is currently unavailable", even though it clearly shows that they are available.

      There used to be more pools showing in this as well. Others have disappeared over time. Originally these all imported with only minor problems. But they've stopped importing. The device names have changed over time, too. But they are correct.

      root@pve1:/usr/local/mesh_services/meshagent# zpool import
         pool: rpool-pmx3
           id: 9234020319468906434
        state: ONLINE
      status: The pool was last accessed by another system.
       action: The pool can be imported using its name or numeric identifier and
              the '-f' flag.
         see: https://openzfs.github.io/openzfs-docs/msg/ZFS-8000-EY
       config:
      
              rpool-pmx3  ONLINE
                mirror-0  ONLINE
                  sdb3    ONLINE
                  sdc3    ONLINE
                mirror-1  ONLINE
                  sdd     ONLINE
                  sde     ONLINE
      root@pve1:/usr/local/mesh_services/meshagent# zpool import -f rpool-pmx3
      cannot import 'rpool-pmx3': one or more devices is currently unavailable
      
      posted in IT Discussion zfs truenas proxmox storage
      scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
    • RE: Sharepoint - Hybrid / Mixed solution?

      @JasGot said in Sharepoint - Hybrid / Mixed solution?:

      I'm open to even the wildest ideas.

      Is it only MS solutions for documents that they want, or are other options on the table too? Assuming so, but would be foolish not to check.

      posted in IT Discussion
      scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
    • RE: What Are You Doing Right Now

      Working on a ZFS disaster.

      posted in Water Closet
      scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
    • 1
    • 2
    • 8
    • 9
    • 10
    • 11
    • 12
    • 7587
    • 7588
    • 10 / 7588