@Obsolesce said in Is Real Estate Actually a Good Investment on Average?:
Additionally, had you put 202K into an index fund in 2005,what would it be worth today?
Except he didn't have $202k in 2005. He had a loan. He likely had $40k (20%) or less in cash on hand at the time.
@JaredBusch said in Scott Alan Miller Vlog - My Daily Life in Central America:
@scottalanmiller These are fake because the youtube video pic is not your open mouth
hahaha you fixed the Television one.....
@scottalanmiller These are fake because the youtube video pic is not your open mouth
It finally finished..
While I was waiting, I looked at pvecm status and found out it thought I had 4 nodes (see expected votes), when I only have 2 nodes.
I used pvecm expected 2 on both and suddenly the updates moved on and I was able to log in to the web interface immediately.
In the web interface, it showed a pve3 and pve4. These were some test setups I did months ago.
I deleted the nodes from the CLI and everything looks clean again.
Looks like the cert expired in April, so I bet PVE has been hammering ACME.....
When I tried to manually renew the certificate from the command line, it said I have been rate limited.
root@pve:~# pvenode acme cert renew
Loading ACME account details
Placing ACME order
Error: POST to https://acme-v02.api.letsencrypt.org/acme/new-order { "type": "urn:ietf:params:acme:error:rateLimited", "detail": "Error creating new order :: too many certificates (5) already issued for this exact set of domains in the last 168 hours: pm.daerma.com: see https://letsencrypt.org/docs/rate-limits/", "status": 429 }
Task Error: POST to https://acme-v02.api.letsencrypt.org/acme/new-order { "type": "urn:ietf:params:acme:error:rateLimited", "detail": "Error creating new order :: too many certificates (5) already issued for this exact set of domains in the last 168 hours: pm.daerma.com: see https://letsencrypt.org/docs/rate-limits/", "status": 429 }
I have 2 PVE 7 systems running at home. Mostly just to have a non-client, non-production, setup handy.
I could not log in to the web interface of the cluster by FQDN or the direct IP of either unit in the cluster. FQDN did through a cert expired error. So, something is going wrong, as the certificate manager is supposed to handle thing.
SSH works just. I know the password, confirmed by using it for SSH.
Things I saw on a google search did not help. So a reboot. Still did not help. So I ran updates from the CLI, not it has been stuck at 98% for 10 minutes on both systems.
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
having a service plan on your car doesn't include a chauffeur.
fuck, I have to drive myself?
@scottalanmiller said in Remote Screen Blank in Ubuntu 22.04 | Switch Wayland to Xorg:
Normally all we have to do is change it back.
That is not fixing the problem though. Simply working around it.
The problem is why do these tools not work under Wayland?
@NHCSAdmin said in Scale Computing VS Proxmox:
I would be very appreciative to hear any advice/opinions on this
So, both solutions could work for your need.
How are you currently using the Scale nodes? Are you making use of the benefits of the hyperconverged architecture?
If not, then it would be pretty simple to setup everything on a few physical servers in a Proxmox cluster.
Proxmox is going to be more manual work to move things around during updates compared to a Scale system.
Hyperconvergence can basically just be considered as virtualization with all the pieces in a single pane of glass and completely seemless control. The details are more complicated of course, but that is a workable analogy.
@NHCSAdmin said in Scale Computing VS Proxmox:
Our server load is not super intense, it is 9 MS Terminal servers, 2 Exchange Servers, 2 AD servers, a couple of file share servers
Actually, it is pretty intense. Two exchange server and 9 Terminal Servers? That is not a light workload. Sure, it is not huge Enterprise, but that is well beyond basic SMB needs.
@NHCSAdmin said in Scale Computing VS Proxmox:
I was wondering if anyone has any opinions on moving from Scale to something like ProxMox?
These two stacks serve different purposes.
Scale is Hyperconvergence
Proxmox is simple virtualization
Yes there is a lot of overlap between the two depending on how things are setup, but you should ignore trying to squeeze something into a non-standard shape, even if it can fit.
I'll be spinning up a new Nextcloud instance and simply manually migrating users to it I think.
As an update to this, the issue is not resolved, but I purged a couple old nextcloud user accounts, that once deleted, and got enough space to get the needed users fully sync'd again.
I'll be spinning up a new Nextcloud instance and simply manually migrating users to it I think.
@travisdh1 said in Question about fdisk:
(It doesn't have you delete/create the partition).
No, but it tells you to use tools to deal with the "physical" partition same as simply using fdisk to delete and create. Speficially parted or gdisk, and those tools don't like what they see either.
@scottalanmiller said in Question about fdisk:
@travisdh1 said in Question about fdisk:
So raw partitions with no LVM? Sad geek.
Is parted available in CentOS7? It's been so long I forget, but parted tends to act better if you are able to use it.
If I remember correctly, it is.
Yes, by default. No idea how he went with that assumption.
The disk is bigger.
But it is not visible yet.
Normally, you simply use fdisk to delete the partition and recreate it, then LVM and such see the space. But I cannot do that because of the above.
When I left an hour later.
I’ll go back in a couple weeks and add an access point and TV with a cheap desktop PC for meetings and presentations.
