Axigen X Released
-
@axigen said:
@scottalanmiller said:
No, it is normal software, as we originally thought. Not hosted.
You are right @scottalanmiller. On the other hand, we do have also a "hosting"-like business but it is dedicated to large SPs that want a hybrid on-premies / Managed Services / license mix. The offer is a little more complex to be summarized here.
Makes sense.... sounds like sort of a "hosting in conjunction with..." sort of thing.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@DustinB3403 said:
So is Axigen supposed to be a hosted solution that I would configure and setup my self on a Axigen server as a VM?
No, it is normal software, as we originally thought. Not hosted.
Although you could, I'm sure, find a hosting partner for it that is not Axigen directly.
So I'd have to run this locally.... and
@scottalanmiller said:
@DustinB3403 said:
How does the user licensing come into play? I need details to understand what this offers me.
Would be the same way that it does with Exchange, more or less. If you are deploying locally (or in a VM hosted on IaaS) you need a license for each user, basically a CAL. Nothing odd there.
I'd have to maintain a server, and backup for this server and email. O365 seems a lot less work on my part...
What is the licensing cost?
-
@RojoLoco said:
So, @aaronstuder , I take it you work for Axigen? I know the vendor badges here are voluntary, but it's kinda dickish to promote a product while pretending to not be a vendor....
He doesn't, I agree that it sounded that way, but I know that he doesn't work for them. He might be a customer, but not an employee.
-
To be clear, he might NOT be a customer, I have no idea. I just know that he is definitely not an employee.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
[...] the lack of a response as to why it has benefits.
If you have the time, please start with the PDF provided...
@RojoLoco No, @aaronstuder does not work Axigen.
-
@axigen I'm sure I could look this up but while you are here... where in Europe are you based?
-
@scottalanmiller I havn't tried it yes, but I think the product is very interesting.
It supports Windows, great for shops without any Linux people. It's supported, which is a plus.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@RojoLoco said:
So, @aaronstuder , I take it you work for Axigen? I know the vendor badges here are voluntary, but it's kinda dickish to promote a product while pretending to not be a vendor....
He doesn't, I agree that it sounded that way, but I know that he doesn't work for them. He might be a customer, but not an employee.
His OP says "built on our unique mail server technology..." If he doesn't work for them, he's an unknowing shill (kinda worse in my book).
-
@aaronstuder said:
@scottalanmiller I havn't tried it yes, but I think the product is very interesting.
It supports Windows, great for shops without any Linux people. It's supported, which is a plus.
Exchange is supported on Windows.....
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@axigen I'm sure I could look this up but while you are here... where in Europe are you based?
we are in Bucharest, Romania, here: https://www.axigen.com/about-us/contact/
-
Point 2: We put a lot of effort to make Axigen run on the widest platform range. Choose what fits you — from Windows to many Linux flavors , BSD, or Solaris and feel free to switch anytime.
It's more than Linux and Windows and that's important because lots of people go after those two. Being officially supported on BSD and Solaris is really nice. I'm not going to say that it is a huge benefit, but it is a small one and a nice feature. I'd love to run my email on BSD or Solaris, rather than Linux, but that's pretty minor as long as it runs on CentOS. But that's me, I'm the .01% here. For nearly anyone, it is going to be Linux of some flavour. Because of the "non-open" nature, I'm sure that there is a solid Windows deploy base that open solutions do not have because they are going after the "we don't want open" market as well, which open products obviously cannot go after.
-
This post is deleted! -
@aaronstuder said:
It supports Windows, great for shops without any Linux people.
That's great. I agree that this is a major feature for a lot of customers. Not many here, but a lot in the general sense.
-
@RojoLoco said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@RojoLoco said:
So, @aaronstuder , I take it you work for Axigen? I know the vendor badges here are voluntary, but it's kinda dickish to promote a product while pretending to not be a vendor....
He doesn't, I agree that it sounded that way, but I know that he doesn't work for them. He might be a customer, but not an employee.
His OP says "built on our unique mail server technology..." If he doesn't work for them, he's an unknowing shill (kinda worse in my book).
He's done that a few times before, it's odd so I took notice. He's copying their website or something and sometimes grabs pronouns or such that look weird if you don't know that he didn't write it himself.
-
@aaronstuder said:
It's supported, which is a plus.
Do you mean on Windows? Because I'm not aware of any email product that we would discuss that isn't supported.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
Point 2: We put a lot of effort to make Axigen run on the widest platform range. Choose what fits you — from Windows to many Linux flavors , BSD, or Solaris and feel free to switch anytime.
It's more than Linux and Windows and that's important because lots of people go after those two. Being officially supported on BSD and Solaris is really nice. I'm not going to say that it is a huge benefit, but it is a small one and a nice feature. I'd love to run my email on BSD or Solaris, rather than Linux, but that's pretty minor as long as it runs on CentOS. But that's me, I'm the .01% here. For nearly anyone, it is going to be Linux of some flavour. Because of the "non-open" nature, I'm sure that there is a solid Windows deploy base that open solutions do not have because they are going after the "we don't want open" market as well, which open products obviously cannot go after.
We do have large SPs that run on Solaris as well as BSD taking advantage of ZFS to the fullest.
-
@axigen said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@axigen I'm sure I could look this up but while you are here... where in Europe are you based?
we are in Bucharest, Romania, here: https://www.axigen.com/about-us/contact/
That's what I was wondering and damn... you won't believe this.... I'll be there in a few hours. Packing for the flight literally as we speak. I leave at 5:30 am for Bucharest.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@axigen said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@axigen I'm sure I could look this up but while you are here... where in Europe are you based?
we are in Bucharest, Romania, here: https://www.axigen.com/about-us/contact/
That's what I was wondering and damn... you won't believe this.... I'll be there in a few hours. Packing for the flight literally as we speak. I leave at 5:30 am for Bucharest.
Would you like to meet tomorrow ;)?
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@axigen said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@axigen I'm sure I could look this up but while you are here... where in Europe are you based?
we are in Bucharest, Romania, here: https://www.axigen.com/about-us/contact/
That's what I was wondering and damn... you won't believe this.... I'll be there in a few hours. Packing for the flight literally as we speak. I leave at 5:30 am for Bucharest.
Sounds liek @scottalanmiller should get to tour the Axigen facilities and see this product up front and in person.
-
@axigen said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Point 2: We put a lot of effort to make Axigen run on the widest platform range. Choose what fits you — from Windows to many Linux flavors , BSD, or Solaris and feel free to switch anytime.
It's more than Linux and Windows and that's important because lots of people go after those two. Being officially supported on BSD and Solaris is really nice. I'm not going to say that it is a huge benefit, but it is a small one and a nice feature. I'd love to run my email on BSD or Solaris, rather than Linux, but that's pretty minor as long as it runs on CentOS. But that's me, I'm the .01% here. For nearly anyone, it is going to be Linux of some flavour. Because of the "non-open" nature, I'm sure that there is a solid Windows deploy base that open solutions do not have because they are going after the "we don't want open" market as well, which open products obviously cannot go after.
We do have large SPs that run on Solaris as well as BSD taking advantage of ZFS to the fullest.
LOL, I've got plenty of opinion on ZFS as well
Not that it isn't good, I've worked with the ZFS team in fact, just that it is overused and misused way too often in the SMB.I'm intrigued that you have lots of users on those platforms, though. Very good to hear. Can you disclose... are they non-US customers? That seems a very non-American deployment strategy.
