Excel Locking Documents Sporadically -- File Server
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
It's a separation thing - I don't see it as black and white as you do. But I get you point.
What I see as black and white is... if you have grey in the picture and the grey represents evil, you have evil. You see someone being actively malicious, but have a personal guide of "well, you have to be 'this' evil to be called evil." Yes, if the question is, do I see that the action is evil regardless of the "level of evil" then it is evil.
But I see you as being black and white too... you have, I think, admitted that they are evil. So, black and white. Just you then further define another point of "how much evil before you will admit it". So your result is still black and white, but instead of "is or isn't evil", you use "is evil enough for me to admit it or not" as the dividing line.
You give a fudge factor of "clearly they were malicious, but I won't call the action evil for some reason." Why, I have no idea. but I don't see how it introduces more grey, it's just as black or white. It's just, I'd say less useful. Because you seeing some lying as okay and not bad. You see some spite as okay but not bad. You see hurting others intentionally as okay as long as it isn't too much. I see where you would call that grey, but I don't really see that as true. You are just moving the line to where you don't have to face the fact that people need to be held accountable.
Like stealing candy bars is different than stealing cars. The scale is different, the morality is not.
I wasn't on board with this whole post until the very last line. You're right the morality isn't different - so talking about the accountability - rarely do we IT folks find ourselves in a position to be able to hold these people accountable to reporting things truthfully and accurately.
If I could send a nurse home for the day because she reported something wrong - damn - it wouldn't be long before that would no longer be a problem. Sadly management doesn't see the value in that, which seems ridiculous when you consider one of their primary jobs is accurately recording data into medical charts.
-
Apparently this is an ethics thread now
There must be a reason for this. Something tangible that I need to know even if I can't realistically fix it. It's driving me nuts.
-
@Dashrender said:
If I could send a nurse home for the day because she reported something wrong - damn - it wouldn't be long before that would no longer be a problem. Sadly management doesn't see the value in that, which seems ridiculous when you consider one of their primary jobs is accurately recording data into medical charts.
I don't suggest that IT be police any more than any other department. But it is important that we recognize what is happening and report it if there is policy. HR should be handling these things, that's their job. If they decide that these ethics problems are allowed, that's their problem, not IT's.
-
@wirestyle22 said:
Apparently this is an ethics thread now
There must be a reason for this. Something tangible that I need to know even if I can't realistically fix it. It's driving me nuts.
For why user's lie? Just because that's how they are.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@wirestyle22 said:
Apparently this is an ethics thread now
There must be a reason for this. Something tangible that I need to know even if I can't realistically fix it. It's driving me nuts.
For why user's lie? Just because that's how they are.
No for the excel problem
-
@wirestyle22 said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@wirestyle22 said:
Apparently this is an ethics thread now
There must be a reason for this. Something tangible that I need to know even if I can't realistically fix it. It's driving me nuts.
For why user's lie? Just because that's how they are.
No for the excel problem
So killing indexing didn't solve it?
-
@Dashrender said:
@wirestyle22 said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@wirestyle22 said:
Apparently this is an ethics thread now
There must be a reason for this. Something tangible that I need to know even if I can't realistically fix it. It's driving me nuts.
For why user's lie? Just because that's how they are.
No for the excel problem
So killing indexing didn't solve it?
No it didn't. It seemed like it did but she still ran into the same problem. I posted this above:
"Appreciate the effort. For the record she told me it said "read only" but it actually says "open by another user". She was making an assumption which I specifically asked her about and she gave me false information. The thing is there is no other open version of the file from the servers point of view. I think this might be a case of excel being closed improperly so to test this I had her start excel, open the file within excel, close the file in excel (while keeping excel running) and then open a new file. Rinse and repeat. We have not had this issue occur since then. We have probably opened at least 150 documents up until this point. So my question is where do i go from here?"
-
@wirestyle22 said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@wirestyle22 said:
Apparently this is an ethics thread now
There must be a reason for this. Something tangible that I need to know even if I can't realistically fix it. It's driving me nuts.
For why user's lie? Just because that's how they are.
No for the excel problem
OHH!!!
-
@Dashrender said:
@wirestyle22 said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@wirestyle22 said:
Apparently this is an ethics thread now
There must be a reason for this. Something tangible that I need to know even if I can't realistically fix it. It's driving me nuts.
For why user's lie? Just because that's how they are.
No for the excel problem
So killing indexing didn't solve it?
Kill the user instead?
too soon?
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
@wirestyle22 said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@wirestyle22 said:
Apparently this is an ethics thread now
There must be a reason for this. Something tangible that I need to know even if I can't realistically fix it. It's driving me nuts.
For why user's lie? Just because that's how they are.
No for the excel problem
So killing indexing didn't solve it?
Kill the user instead?
too soon?
I actually really like this particular user. I just don't know where to go with this
-
@wirestyle22 said:
@Dashrender said:
@wirestyle22 said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@wirestyle22 said:
Apparently this is an ethics thread now
There must be a reason for this. Something tangible that I need to know even if I can't realistically fix it. It's driving me nuts.
For why user's lie? Just because that's how they are.
No for the excel problem
So killing indexing didn't solve it?
No it didn't. It seemed like it did but she still ran into the same problem. I posted this above:
"Appreciate the effort. For the record she told me it said "read only" but it actually says "open by another user". She was making an assumption which I specifically asked her about and she gave me false information. The thing is there is no other open version of the file from the servers point of view. I think this might be a case of excel being closed improperly so to test this I had her start excel, open the file within excel, close the file in excel (while keeping excel running) and then open a new file. Rinse and repeat. We have not had this issue occur since then. We have probably opened at least 150 documents up until this point. So my question is where do i go from here?"
So I'm lost - is the problem solved? You say it hasn't happened since you started having her close using this new method of closing the file, then closing Excel.
I'm sure you agree that this is ridiculous and shouldn't be required, but you did find at least a solution, or so it seams.
-
When I had this problem before, I checked on the server side to see what files where open.
When the user closes the file (and has the locked error) I looked on the server and saw that the server still had a file lock on the file in question - claiming to be form the user in question.
I have no idea why it would not release it.
-
@Dashrender said:
@wirestyle22 said:
@Dashrender said:
@wirestyle22 said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@wirestyle22 said:
Apparently this is an ethics thread now
There must be a reason for this. Something tangible that I need to know even if I can't realistically fix it. It's driving me nuts.
For why user's lie? Just because that's how they are.
No for the excel problem
So killing indexing didn't solve it?
No it didn't. It seemed like it did but she still ran into the same problem. I posted this above:
"Appreciate the effort. For the record she told me it said "read only" but it actually says "open by another user". She was making an assumption which I specifically asked her about and she gave me false information. The thing is there is no other open version of the file from the servers point of view. I think this might be a case of excel being closed improperly so to test this I had her start excel, open the file within excel, close the file in excel (while keeping excel running) and then open a new file. Rinse and repeat. We have not had this issue occur since then. We have probably opened at least 150 documents up until this point. So my question is where do i go from here?"
So I'm lost - is the problem solved? You say it hasn't happened since you started having her close using this new method of closing the file, then closing Excel.
I'm sure you agree that this is ridiculous and shouldn't be required, but you did find at least a solution, or so it seams.
I'm scared to say yes because the last time I thought It was fixed it wasn't. I'm monitoring the issue and will report back.
-
@Dashrender said:
When I had this problem before, I checked on the server side to see what files where open.
When the user closes the file (and has the locked error) I looked on the server and saw that the server still had a file lock on the file in question - claiming to be form the user in question.
I have no idea why it would not release it.
I did exactly that and as far as the server knows the file is closed and there should be no issue.
¯_(ツ)_/¯
waiting.
-
hmm.. sounds like our issues were/are different then.
