ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Xen Orchestra on Ubuntu 15.10 - Complete installation instructions

    IT Discussion
    how to xen orchestra ubuntu 15.10 debian xen open source ubuntu linux xenserver
    24
    609
    281.0k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • travisdh1T
      travisdh1
      last edited by

      Are we ALL kicking the tires on Xen Orchestra now?

      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • DustinB3403D
        DustinB3403
        last edited by

        I have my "production" server running a XO VM. I just need a USB flash drive to configure my backup host to run Xen (and subsequently a CentOS SMB file Server) as the backup target.

        Those should be in tomorrow so it should be a pretty good setup.

        And yeah, as soon as @olivier posted the sources, and the delta backup capabilities I was sold. Now to test it 🙂

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • stacksofplatesS
          stacksofplates
          last edited by

          I've got it running in a container and it's been pretty nice. Haven't had any issues so far.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • travisdh1T
            travisdh1
            last edited by

            I went ahead and got a Debian ova made for anyone who wants the easy way out. http://mangolassi.it/topic/7371/xen-orchestra-v4-11-ova/7

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • A
              Alex Sage
              last edited by

              I am trying to do this using Ubuntu 14.04.3 but I get Cannot GET / 😞

              xo@xo:~/xo-server$ sudo npm start
              
              > [email protected] start /home/xo/xo-server
              > node bin/xo-server
              
                app-conf /home/xo/xo-server/config.json +0ms
                app-conf /home/xo/xo-server/.xo-server.yaml +3ms
                xo:main Configuration loaded. +13ms
                xo:main Web server listening on http://[::]:80 +9ms
                xo:perf blocked for 209ms +265ms
              
              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                Why such an old Ubuntu version? I'm surprised there are issues, but still, that's old.

                A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  What Node.js version do you have installed?

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • A
                    Alex Sage @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    @scottalanmiller Because it's the lastest LTS release. Isn't using LTS best practice?

                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @Alex Sage
                      last edited by

                      @anonymous said:

                      @scottalanmiller Because it's the lastest LTS release. Isn't using LTS best practice?

                      No, it's a bad practice. Using something with "long term support" is a good practice, but with Ubuntu it is just a naming thing for marketing purposes. Even Canonical themselves do not recognize it as an LTS. It's just letters that they slap on every fourth release to make it sound like an enterprise product like RHEL. It isn't. Ubuntu is a rolling release will full support only for the latest build. So sticking to LTS is just "not updating" in this case. One of the many reasons that Ubuntu isn't that good. It's not "bad", but it isn't up to par.

                      Ubuntu is like Fedora, you always want to be on the latest unless there is a compatibility issue. You would never intentionally use an LTS release unless you are doing something like MongoDB which only releases for certain versions. And the answer there is not to use Ubuntu but to use CentOS which is kept up to date.

                      If you want a true LTS, Ubuntu is not an option for you. RHEL and SLES are the only enterprise long term support options in the Linux world.

                      RomoR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        So your idea of sticking to a long term supported product is sound, it just doesn't apply to Ubuntu where LTS doesn't actually mean it is getting long term support.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • DashrenderD
                          Dashrender
                          last edited by

                          Does Long Term Support even matter though? Is that for a situation where you can't upgrade the OS because of some limitation of the software running on top of it?

                          Assuming the software will run on the latest, isn't that really the only place to be, support and patch wise?

                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                            last edited by

                            @Dashrender said:

                            Does Long Term Support even matter though? Is that for a situation where you can't upgrade the OS because of some limitation of the software running on top of it?

                            Assuming the software will run on the latest, isn't that really the only place to be, support and patch wise?

                            So that's an interesting thought and I lean the way that you are thinking. But you can't guarantee forward compatibility in all cases. So I'd say "it depends." For most things, especially desktops, web apps and non-critical systems, I would go for "rolling releases" like Fedora and OpenSuse Tumbleweed or Ubuntu "current release" to make sure that I was always completely up to date. This eliminates a lot of migration risk and deprecation risk down the road.

                            But when running apps that needs serious stability, long term testing and vendor support, it is often best to choose CentOS or OpenSuse Leap with super long, very stable release cycles and hard core support so that you can be sure that everything is going to work.

                            DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • A
                              Alex Sage
                              last edited by

                              So I am going to try again with the latest version of Ubuntu Server, or Debian.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • A
                                Alex Sage
                                last edited by

                                or should I try CentOS 7? Everything else I run is on CentOS 7.....

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  Since you are at the point of "trying", I would definitely do CentOS 7.

                                  A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • A
                                    Alex Sage @scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    @scottalanmiller You are a bit of a CentOS fanboy, and you made me one too! =P

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • DashrenderD
                                      Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      @scottalanmiller said:

                                      @Dashrender said:

                                      Does Long Term Support even matter though? Is that for a situation where you can't upgrade the OS because of some limitation of the software running on top of it?

                                      Assuming the software will run on the latest, isn't that really the only place to be, support and patch wise?

                                      So that's an interesting thought and I lean the way that you are thinking. But you can't guarantee forward compatibility in all cases. So I'd say "it depends." For most things, especially desktops, web apps and non-critical systems, I would go for "rolling releases" like Fedora and OpenSuse Tumbleweed or Ubuntu "current release" to make sure that I was always completely up to date. This eliminates a lot of migration risk and deprecation risk down the road.

                                      But when running apps that needs serious stability, long term testing and vendor support, it is often best to choose CentOS or OpenSuse Leap with super long, very stable release cycles and hard core support so that you can be sure that everything is going to work.

                                      So we basically said the same thing - I did put the assuming the software will run on the latest bit in there. Of course if the software won't run on the latest, you need to stay on the version you're at.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • A
                                        Alex Sage
                                        last edited by

                                        You have to uncommend mounts! =/

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • A
                                          Alex Sage
                                          last edited by

                                          I must be missing something, because I am having issues with every distro I use.....

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • A
                                            Alex Sage
                                            last edited by

                                            npm ERR! Linux 3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64
                                            npm ERR! argv "/usr/local/bin/node" "/usr/local/bin/npm" "start"
                                            npm ERR! node v5.4.0
                                            npm ERR! npm  v3.3.12
                                            npm ERR! code ELIFECYCLE
                                            npm ERR! [email protected] start: `node bin/xo-server`
                                            npm ERR! Exit status 1
                                            npm ERR!
                                            npm ERR! Failed at the [email protected] start script 'node bin/xo-server'.
                                            npm ERR! Make sure you have the latest version of node.js and npm installed.
                                            npm ERR! If you do, this is most likely a problem with the xo-server package,
                                            npm ERR! not with npm itself.
                                            npm ERR! Tell the author that this fails on your system:
                                            npm ERR!     node bin/xo-server
                                            npm ERR! You can get their info via:
                                            npm ERR!     npm owner ls xo-server
                                            npm ERR! There is likely additional logging output above.
                                            
                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 14
                                            • 15
                                            • 16
                                            • 17
                                            • 18
                                            • 30
                                            • 31
                                            • 16 / 31
                                            • First post
                                              Last post