ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    For MangoLassi.it Forum Geeks: StarWind Virtual SAN NFR (not-for-resale) License!

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Self Promotion
    starwind
    82 Posts 18 Posters 14.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • coliverC
      coliver @scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      @scottalanmiller said:

      @dafyre said:

      I am currently using Starwind in my Lab to provide shared storage for my MS-SQL Server Failover cluster. It works great!

      Why are you not using application layer failover for your database?

      He is... he is using the failover built into MS-SQL Server.

      dafyreD scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • dafyreD
        dafyre @coliver
        last edited by

        @coliver Actually, no... It's the Windows Failover Clustering. 🙂

        coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • coliverC
          coliver @dafyre
          last edited by

          @dafyre said:

          @coliver Actually, no... It's the Windows Failover Clustering. 🙂

          Oh, that's not what I read from either of your comments. Sorry.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • dafyreD
            dafyre
            last edited by

            I'm running this on a not-so-great hardware setup as this is just a test environment I have setup. Starwind works quite well despite this fact too.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @dafyre
              last edited by

              @dafyre said:

              @scottalanmiller Because I am more familiar with setting SQL Server up in a failover cluster. I prefer it this way.

              And no, I've never had any issues with corrupted databases or anything like that due to problems with a storage node exploding or going offline for other reasons.

              No, but it is a risk. Just be aware that the database has full HA built in that is completely safe. This would not be. There is always a risk of corruption and NO not from the storage blowing up. That's not how it happens. It is your hypervisor that corrupts it, not the storage. So you are not picturing the issue, which is loss of memory contents.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @coliver
                last edited by

                @coliver said:

                @scottalanmiller said:

                @dafyre said:

                I am currently using Starwind in my Lab to provide shared storage for my MS-SQL Server Failover cluster. It works great!

                Why are you not using application layer failover for your database?

                He is... he is using the failover built into MS-SQL Server.

                Um, that's impossible 😉 MS SQL Server can't affect MySQL.

                coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • coliverC
                  coliver @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said:

                  @coliver said:

                  @scottalanmiller said:

                  @dafyre said:

                  I am currently using Starwind in my Lab to provide shared storage for my MS-SQL Server Failover cluster. It works great!

                  Why are you not using application layer failover for your database?

                  He is... he is using the failover built into MS-SQL Server.

                  Um, that's impossible 😉 MS SQL Server can't affect MySQL.

                  Wait... isn't he running MS-SQL? I'm really confused now :(.

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @coliver
                    last edited by

                    @coliver said:

                    @scottalanmiller said:

                    @coliver said:

                    @scottalanmiller said:

                    @dafyre said:

                    I am currently using Starwind in my Lab to provide shared storage for my MS-SQL Server Failover cluster. It works great!

                    Why are you not using application layer failover for your database?

                    He is... he is using the failover built into MS-SQL Server.

                    Um, that's impossible 😉 MS SQL Server can't affect MySQL.

                    Wait... isn't he running MS-SQL? I'm really confused now :(.

                    MySQL. He's used to MS SQL Server.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • coliverC
                      coliver
                      last edited by

                      I'm going to slowly back out of the conversation. 🏃

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • dafyreD
                        dafyre
                        last edited by

                        Both of you re-read my post, lol. I am running this on a Microsoft SQL Server. I prefer to run Microsoft SQL Server using Windows Failover Clustering.

                        :trollface:

                        coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • coliverC
                          coliver @dafyre
                          last edited by

                          @dafyre said:

                          Both of you re-read my post, lol. I am running this on a Microsoft SQL Server. I prefer to run Microsoft SQL Server using Windows Failover Clustering.

                          :trollface:

                          Ah that helps. Thanks!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            OH!! It is MS SQL Server. Writing it as MS-SQL made my eyes think that it was MySQL.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • dafyreD
                              dafyre
                              last edited by

                              lol. Nope... MySQL is always MySQL. 🙂 I've run that on a Windows Failover Cluster too... just not right now. 🙂

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • DashrenderD
                                Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                @scottalanmiller said:

                                @dafyre said:

                                I am currently using Starwind in my Lab to provide shared storage for my MS-SQL Server Failover cluster. It works great!

                                Why are you not using application layer failover for your database?

                                Because that would require two SQL licenses (but that may actually be required anyway).

                                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • RojoLocoR
                                  RojoLoco
                                  last edited by

                                  That link goes to an Office 365 login page. I don't use Office 365. Got a login we can use to get to the form?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                                    last edited by

                                    @Dashrender said:

                                    @scottalanmiller said:

                                    @dafyre said:

                                    I am currently using Starwind in my Lab to provide shared storage for my MS-SQL Server Failover cluster. It works great!

                                    Why are you not using application layer failover for your database?

                                    Because that would require two SQL licenses (but that may actually be required anyway).

                                    I was assuming MySQL when I said that which has free Galera application level failover.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      Took me to O365 too.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • DashrenderD
                                        Dashrender
                                        last edited by

                                        The form is probably not marked as publicly accessible.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • DashrenderD
                                          Dashrender
                                          last edited by

                                          @StarWind_Software

                                          Awesome! Thanks for extending this to ML users.

                                          Now to find a lab to set this up in.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • brianlittlejohnB
                                            brianlittlejohn
                                            last edited by

                                            I wish I could take advantage of this... don't have enough rep. since i've only been here a couple of weeks.

                                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 5 / 5
                                            • First post
                                              Last post