ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    ZeroTier Review

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    vpnreviewzerotier
    107 Posts 10 Posters 67.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller @stacksofplates
      last edited by

      @johnhooks said:

      Yes. I was planning on having a peer at the office in bridge mode which forwards requests to the office and out of the office.

      That works. So the problem is that the one side can't be connected to the other. A A can see all of B, but B can't see all of A?

      stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stacksofplatesS
        stacksofplates @scottalanmiller
        last edited by stacksofplates

        @scottalanmiller said:

        @johnhooks said:

        Yes. I was planning on having a peer at the office in bridge mode which forwards requests to the office and out of the office.

        That works. So the problem is that the one side can't be connected to the other. A A can see all of B, but B can't see all of A?

        Well I'm not even sure if that's a stipulation. In my experience with this hospital before, I believe it's just because they don't want to do anything on their end. I had set up a client to connect to his existing Cisco router. It works everywhere outside of the hospital's network but they essentially wouldn't attempt to figure out why. That's when I asked if we could do a site to site tunnel and they said "that's not going to happen." So I needed a client/server set up. This will work and is east to connect to but I think the edgerouter will be nicer.

        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @stacksofplates
          last edited by

          @johnhooks said:

          Well I'm not even sure if that's a stipulation. In my experience with this hospital before, I believe it's just because they don't want to do anything on their end.

          Isn't site to site the "least to do on their end" solution?

          stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stacksofplatesS
            stacksofplates @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller said:

            @johnhooks said:

            Well I'm not even sure if that's a stipulation. In my experience with this hospital before, I believe it's just because they don't want to do anything on their end.

            Isn't site to site the "least to do on their end" solution?

            You would think. So we will have to install the client on each billing computer and then they will have to manually connect and disconnect.

            This is a hospital that is still using the records system they wrote in DOS and I'm willing to bet dollars to donuts that it's sent via HTTP over the internet from the offices to the hospital. The doctors just run this small application that sends all of the info to the hospital address. I never inspected, but Ive set it up and never had to create or install any certificates.

            scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @stacksofplates
              last edited by

              @johnhooks said:

              You would think. So we will have to install the client on each billing computer and then they will have to manually connect and disconnect.

              Seems their required solution is the opposite of their stated goals.

              I need a car but you must only buy a boat.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @stacksofplates
                last edited by

                @johnhooks said:

                This is a hospital that is still using the records system they wrote in DOS and I'm willing to bet dollars to donuts that it's sent via HTTP over the internet from the offices to the hospital.

                Seems unlikely. The gap between DOS was a viable OS and when HTTP was a viable transfer protocol was pretty huge. I suspect they are using something far, far older.

                stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stacksofplatesS
                  stacksofplates @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said:

                  @johnhooks said:

                  This is a hospital that is still using the records system they wrote in DOS and I'm willing to bet dollars to donuts that it's sent via HTTP over the internet from the offices to the hospital.

                  Seems unlikely. The gap between DOS was a viable OS and when HTTP was a viable transfer protocol was pretty huge. I suspect they are using something far, far older.

                  Well that's even worse then. They are supposed to switch over to the system that this doctors office uses. So I'm sure I'll be in for some fun when the switch happens.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    That will be a big shock coming from DOS! What OS are they running the app on now? XP, I assume?

                    stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stacksofplatesS
                      stacksofplates @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller said:

                      That will be a big shock coming from DOS! What OS are they running the app on now? XP, I assume?

                      Well I'm not sure about in the hospital itself. They send out discs with updates to the doctors offices so it does run on 7 in the doctors office.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • dafyreD
                        dafyre @stacksofplates
                        last edited by

                        @johnhooks I activated the bridging functionality within ZeroTier when I created the network, and then authorized the client (at my destination network) to be a bridge, and then I set up the route on my remote ztClient.... I should probably draw it out, lol.

                        I did have to set up a Linux VM to get the routing to work right. Windows doesn't do routing without having to install RRAS, and I didn't feel like settingall that up (and I had a fresh Fedora VM with nothing on it anyway, lol)...

                        ... |---(Llinksys, NAT)---- (public internet)--------------(remote client, 192.168.251.49/24, zt0)
                        (SITE A)--|
                        ... |--(SITE A LAN, 192.168.10.0/24)--(192.168.10.10/24, eth0)--ztRouter(192.168.251.179/24, zt0)

                        On my Linksys, I added a route to 192.168.251.0/24 via 192.168.10.10.
                        On the remote client, I added a route to 192.168.10.0/24 via 192.68.251.179

                        stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • stacksofplatesS
                          stacksofplates @dafyre
                          last edited by stacksofplates

                          @dafyre said:

                          @johnhooks I activated the bridging functionality within ZeroTier when I created the network, and then authorized the client (at my destination network) to be a bridge, and then I set up the route on my remote ztClient.... I should probably draw it out, lol.

                          I did have to set up a Linux VM to get the routing to work right. Windows doesn't do routing without having to install RRAS, and I didn't feel like settingall that up (and I had a fresh Fedora VM with nothing on it anyway, lol)...

                          ... |---(Llinksys, NAT)---- (public internet)--------------(remote client, 192.168.251.49/24, zt0)
                          (SITE A)--|
                          ... |--(SITE A LAN, 192.168.10.0/24)--(192.168.10.10/24, eth0)--ztRouter(192.168.251.179/24, zt0)

                          On my Linksys, I added a route to 192.168.251.0/24 via 192.168.10.10.
                          On the remote client, I added a route to 192.168.10.0/24 via 192.68.251.179

                          Thanks so much for all of your help. I did get everything to work between my laptop and a VM. I didn't know if when I checked bridge on the web interface I had to bridge the zt0 and eth0 interfaces.

                          Took me a while to figure everything out. I could ping my eth0 ip for my laptop but nothing else. After much wailing and gnashing of teeth I realized I had set masquerading up incorrectly.

                          This might not work for the intended purpose since routing would have to be set up on the hospital side and they are most likely not going to do anything (also they are using Windows).

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • dafyreD
                            dafyre
                            last edited by

                            I gotcha. It may be best, then to have the server hosting the software run ZeroTier, and then your other Doctors join your ZeroTier network as well...

                            But it seems to me that I remember reading somebody didn't want it done that way...

                            stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stacksofplatesS
                              stacksofplates @dafyre
                              last edited by stacksofplates

                              @dafyre said:

                              I gotcha. It may be best, then to have the server hosting the software run ZeroTier, and then your other Doctors join your ZeroTier network as well...

                              But it seems to me that I remember reading somebody didn't want it done that way...

                              That would have been the easiest, but I can't get access to the application server. It's locked down and the software company has to ssh in to change anything. They won't install any third party packages. But I don't expect them to, that could be a big issue.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • A
                                Alex Sage
                                last edited by

                                So, can I install this software on one computer, and use it to access the entire network?

                                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @Alex Sage
                                  last edited by

                                  @anonymous said:

                                  So, can I install this software on one computer, and use it to access the entire network?

                                  It's the same as Pertino in that way, or Hamachi. You can access any node that also has the software on it or anything sitting behind a gateway.

                                  A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • A
                                    Alex Sage @scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    @scottalanmiller said:

                                    or anything sitting behind a gateway.

                                    Can you explain that?

                                    DashrenderD scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • DashrenderD
                                      Dashrender @Alex Sage
                                      last edited by

                                      @anonymous said:

                                      @scottalanmiller said:

                                      or anything sitting behind a gateway.

                                      Can you explain that?

                                      It's like a site to site, or client to site VPN. You (or a firewall) connect to a gateway device on the network you want to connect to, then you appear as a node on that network simply able to connect to things as if you were local.

                                      This is a bit more complex as you need to setup routing, etc.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • scottalanmillerS
                                        scottalanmiller @Alex Sage
                                        last edited by

                                        @anonymous said:

                                        @scottalanmiller said:

                                        or anything sitting behind a gateway.

                                        Can you explain that?

                                        A gateway connects the VPN to the network behind it, same as any "normal" VPN device.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • DashrenderD
                                          Dashrender
                                          last edited by

                                          I needed a quick and dirty single device to my server connection for a project that is suppose to last about a month. I went from zero to finished in about 30 mins. Using ZeroTier as the host, damn that was fast and easy

                                          Frankly I looked at Pertino first thinking they had a free for 10 users type thing, but I couldn't find immediately so I bailed and moved onto ZeroTier.

                                          Now time to see about standing up my own ZT host.

                                          JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                          • JaredBuschJ
                                            JaredBusch @Dashrender
                                            last edited by JaredBusch

                                            @Dashrender said:

                                            I needed a quick and dirty single device to my server connection for a project that is suppose to last about a month. I went from zero to finished in about 30 mins. Using ZeroTier as the host, damn that was fast and easy

                                            Frankly I looked at Pertino first thinking they had a free for 10 users type thing, but I couldn't find immediately so I bailed and moved onto ZeroTier.

                                            Now time to see about standing up my own ZT host.

                                            A Pertino account with no paid subscription can have 3 devices on the network.

                                            Works a treat for one off stuff like you mentioned as long as you need only a 1 to 1 access. I like to use it to provide RDP access to an internal PC or VM that the user can then use to access whatever they need.

                                            DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 6
                                            • 1 / 6
                                            • First post
                                              Last post