Update to 0.7.0
-
-
@MattSpeller said:
@tonyshowoff said:
Thank god I'm not a hamburger black guy
The beatings will continue until your burgers improve.
The burgers will continue until your beatings improve.
-
@scottalanmiller Well, hello, how you doin'?
So... what are you doin' later? I'm hungry and I've got a lot of charcoal.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
The burgers will continue until your beatings improve.
Meal and a workout? Sounds great haha
-
-
@scottalanmiller I couldn't click ^ fast enough on that post, I almost knocked my mouse off my desk
-
What is wrong with people?
-
@scottalanmiller The first hydrocephalitic burglar
-
-
The site looks a million times better in Firefox than chrome. Still odd placement of things but seems to work much better. Also the text is larger and the Page expands more to fill the screen. On my 1920x1080 monitors in chrome it just centers and doesn't take up much of the screen.
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
The site looks a million times better in Firefox than chrome. Still odd placement of things but seems to work much better. Also the text is larger and the Page expands more to fill the screen. On my 1920x1080 monitors in chrome it just centers and doesn't take up much of the screen.
My god in heaven, he's right!
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
The site looks a million times better in Firefox than chrome. Still odd placement of things but seems to work much better. Also the text is larger and the Page expands more to fill the screen. On my 1920x1080 monitors in chrome it just centers and doesn't take up much of the screen.
An, I am in FF so that might be affecting me.
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
The site looks a million times better in Firefox than chrome. Still odd placement of things but seems to work much better. Also the text is larger and the Page expands more to fill the screen. On my 1920x1080 monitors in chrome it just centers and doesn't take up much of the screen.
Wow... it does look a lot better.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@thecreativeone91 said:
The site looks a million times better in Firefox than chrome. Still odd placement of things but seems to work much better. Also the text is larger and the Page expands more to fill the screen. On my 1920x1080 monitors in chrome it just centers and doesn't take up much of the screen.
An, I am in FF so that might be affecting me.
I thought you were a chrome user? I just switch backed Firefox from chrome today cause I was having memory leaks with html5 videos in chrome anyway.
-
@coliver said:
@thecreativeone91 said:
The site looks a million times better in Firefox than chrome. Still odd placement of things but seems to work much better. Also the text is larger and the Page expands more to fill the screen. On my 1920x1080 monitors in chrome it just centers and doesn't take up much of the screen.
Wow... it does look a lot better.
Nevermind did a side-by-side comparison, the same on both windows... looks slightly different on the firefox one but only slightly.
-
It's a lot different for me. A lot more useable in Firefox.
-
I'm in Chrome and it is really tiny. Just looked at Firefox and it does look a little better.
-
The only difference for me from Chrome to FF is that FF the text appears to be more bolded, while not actually being in BOLD
I use tabs down the left side, so the extra white space is less noticeable on FF than on Chrome, but when I compare them.. they both have about the same amount of whitespace.
-
@Dashrender said:
The only difference for me from Chrome to FF is that FF the text appears to be more bolded, while not actually being in BOLD
Mine the text is bigger and the Page frame is expanded to fill more of the screen. In chrome the two white spaces on the sides of the frame combined are equivalent to the whole space the frame takes up. In Firefox it's not even half the size of the frame.
-
I don't think the white space is as wide on the two sides as the text in the middle.
