ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Non-IT News Thread

    Water Closet
    91
    11.2k
    5.7m
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • coliverC
      coliver
      last edited by coliver

      You'll always be Boaty McBoatface to me.

      http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/05/06/477010650/boaty-by-another-name-sir-david-attenborough-is-chosen-for-british-research-ship

      RojoLocoR NattNattN 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • RojoLocoR
        RojoLoco @coliver
        last edited by

        @coliver said in Non-IT News Thread:

        You'll always be Boaty McBoatface to me.

        http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/05/06/477010650/boaty-by-another-name-sir-david-attenborough-is-chosen-for-british-research-ship

        Better they call it David Attenborough than some of the other "real person" choices. One was some kid w/ cancer... I mean, WTF is some sob story kid doing getting nominated to have a marine research vessel named after them???

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • NattNattN
          NattNatt @coliver
          last edited by

          @coliver said in Non-IT News Thread:

          You'll always be Boaty McBoatface to me.

          http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/05/06/477010650/boaty-by-another-name-sir-david-attenborough-is-chosen-for-british-research-ship

          One of the support vessels is being called Boaty McBoatface as a tribute 😉 and it's being registered in the Falkland Islands 😄

          @RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:

          @coliver said in Non-IT News Thread:

          You'll always be Boaty McBoatface to me.

          http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/05/06/477010650/boaty-by-another-name-sir-david-attenborough-is-chosen-for-british-research-ship

          Better they call it David Attenborough than some of the other "real person" choices. One was some kid w/ cancer... I mean, WTF is some sob story kid doing getting nominated to have a marine research vessel named after them???

          yeah, especially since the girl died this week...like, do you really want a constant reminder of that, plus the fact hardly anyone knows the kid, and they did nothing for science...

          RojoLocoR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • RojoLocoR
            RojoLoco @NattNatt
            last edited by

            @NattNatt said in Non-IT News Thread:

            @coliver said in Non-IT News Thread:

            You'll always be Boaty McBoatface to me.

            http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/05/06/477010650/boaty-by-another-name-sir-david-attenborough-is-chosen-for-british-research-ship

            One of the support vessels is being called Boaty McBoatface as a tribute 😉 and it's being registered in the Falkland Islands 😄

            @RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:

            @coliver said in Non-IT News Thread:

            You'll always be Boaty McBoatface to me.

            http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/05/06/477010650/boaty-by-another-name-sir-david-attenborough-is-chosen-for-british-research-ship

            Better they call it David Attenborough than some of the other "real person" choices. One was some kid w/ cancer... I mean, WTF is some sob story kid doing getting nominated to have a marine research vessel named after them???

            yeah, especially since the girl died this week...like, do you really want a constant reminder of that, plus the fact hardly anyone knows the kid, and they did nothing for science...

            I'm very anti-sob story. everybody has problems, that doesn't make you special.

            It fills my heart with joy to know that Boaty McBoatface will be there alongside the big ship 🙂

            NattNattN scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
            • NattNattN
              NattNatt @RojoLoco
              last edited by

              @RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:

              @NattNatt said in Non-IT News Thread:

              @coliver said in Non-IT News Thread:

              You'll always be Boaty McBoatface to me.

              http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/05/06/477010650/boaty-by-another-name-sir-david-attenborough-is-chosen-for-british-research-ship

              One of the support vessels is being called Boaty McBoatface as a tribute 😉 and it's being registered in the Falkland Islands 😄

              @RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:

              @coliver said in Non-IT News Thread:

              You'll always be Boaty McBoatface to me.

              http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/05/06/477010650/boaty-by-another-name-sir-david-attenborough-is-chosen-for-british-research-ship

              Better they call it David Attenborough than some of the other "real person" choices. One was some kid w/ cancer... I mean, WTF is some sob story kid doing getting nominated to have a marine research vessel named after them???

              yeah, especially since the girl died this week...like, do you really want a constant reminder of that, plus the fact hardly anyone knows the kid, and they did nothing for science...

              I'm very anti-sob story. everybody has problems, that doesn't make you special.

              It fills my heart with joy to know that Boaty McBoatface will be there alongside the big ship 🙂

              yeah same...like, you're basically riding the coat-tails of someone else's misery/reminding yourself of a shit time in your life over and over..? That's verging on a mental illness...

              Yeah, a nice tribute at least...

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @RojoLoco
                last edited by

                @RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:

                @NattNatt said in Non-IT News Thread:

                @coliver said in Non-IT News Thread:

                You'll always be Boaty McBoatface to me.

                http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/05/06/477010650/boaty-by-another-name-sir-david-attenborough-is-chosen-for-british-research-ship

                One of the support vessels is being called Boaty McBoatface as a tribute 😉 and it's being registered in the Falkland Islands 😄

                @RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:

                @coliver said in Non-IT News Thread:

                You'll always be Boaty McBoatface to me.

                http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/05/06/477010650/boaty-by-another-name-sir-david-attenborough-is-chosen-for-british-research-ship

                Better they call it David Attenborough than some of the other "real person" choices. One was some kid w/ cancer... I mean, WTF is some sob story kid doing getting nominated to have a marine research vessel named after them???

                yeah, especially since the girl died this week...like, do you really want a constant reminder of that, plus the fact hardly anyone knows the kid, and they did nothing for science...

                I'm very anti-sob story. everybody has problems, that doesn't make you special.

                It fills my heart with joy to know that Boaty McBoatface will be there alongside the big ship 🙂

                I'm in the same... wait for it... boat. But kidding aside, while I feel terrible for the girl who died and the family that had to go through it, the reality is is that everyone dies and everyone wants to be honoured or wants their family member honoured or whatever. Only a tiny, tiny percentage of people can get honoured in some special way and shouldn't it be the very few people who earned it?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                • DominicaD
                  Dominica
                  last edited by

                  Good job, Murica.

                  http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/ivy-league-economist-ethnically-profiled-interrogated-for-doing-math-on-american-airlines-flight/ar-BBsK6RQ?ocid=spartandhp

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    Meanwhile, in Latvia: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/offbeat/a-beaver-reportedly-took-a-man-hostage-in-latvia/ar-BBs7qSJ

                    tonyshowoffT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • tonyshowoffT
                      tonyshowoff @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                      Meanwhile, in Latvia: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/offbeat/a-beaver-reportedly-took-a-man-hostage-in-latvia/ar-BBs7qSJ

                      A lot of hilarity comes out of the Baltic states, except Estonia, they're humourless.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        Keeping it classy, Florida...

                        http://edition.cnn.com/2016/05/08/us/man-allegedly-kills-brother-over-cheeseburger/index.html

                        tonyshowoffT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • tonyshowoffT
                          tonyshowoff @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by tonyshowoff

                          This post is deleted!
                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • tonyshowoffT
                            tonyshowoff
                            last edited by

                            Well, it only took 20 years

                            http://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/world/2016/05/07/Bosnia-s-Muslims-reopen-mosque-Serbs-blew-up-during-the-war.html

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              I saw that, rebuilt with the original stones (mostly.)

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • coliverC
                                coliver
                                last edited by

                                http://technology.nasa.gov/patents

                                Good for NASA.

                                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @coliver
                                  last edited by

                                  @coliver said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                  http://technology.nasa.gov/patents

                                  Good for NASA.

                                  Sort of. Their site says that their patents "benefits American citizens" but then say that "companies can license them." So basically, they are just acting like any business selling patent licensing. It's not like they are opening their portfolio or using it to promote non-aggression. Really, as a part of the government, they shouldn't even be allowed to have patents and/or their patents should be automatically the property of the nation, not just NASA. I think they are falling short of even a minimally acceptable standard.

                                  RojoLocoR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                                  • RojoLocoR
                                    RojoLoco @scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                    @coliver said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                    http://technology.nasa.gov/patents

                                    Good for NASA.

                                    Sort of. Their site says that their patents "benefits American citizens" but then say that "companies can license them." So basically, they are just acting like any business selling patent licensing. It's not like they are opening their portfolio or using it to promote non-aggression. Really, as a part of the government, they shouldn't even be allowed to have patents and/or their patents should be automatically the property of the nation, not just NASA. I think they are falling short of even a minimally acceptable standard.

                                    Since NASA only gets about half of one percent of the federal budget, why not let them try to make some more fundage?

                                    tonyshowoffT scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                    • tonyshowoffT
                                      tonyshowoff @RojoLoco
                                      last edited by

                                      @RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                      @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                      @coliver said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                      http://technology.nasa.gov/patents

                                      Good for NASA.

                                      Sort of. Their site says that their patents "benefits American citizens" but then say that "companies can license them." So basically, they are just acting like any business selling patent licensing. It's not like they are opening their portfolio or using it to promote non-aggression. Really, as a part of the government, they shouldn't even be allowed to have patents and/or their patents should be automatically the property of the nation, not just NASA. I think they are falling short of even a minimally acceptable standard.

                                      Since NASA only gets about half of one percent of the federal budget, why not let them try to make some more fundage?

                                      Half of one percent? Damn it that's why my taxes are so high! Cancel the whole thing!

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                      • scottalanmillerS
                                        scottalanmiller @RojoLoco
                                        last edited by

                                        @RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                        @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                        @coliver said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                        http://technology.nasa.gov/patents

                                        Good for NASA.

                                        Sort of. Their site says that their patents "benefits American citizens" but then say that "companies can license them." So basically, they are just acting like any business selling patent licensing. It's not like they are opening their portfolio or using it to promote non-aggression. Really, as a part of the government, they shouldn't even be allowed to have patents and/or their patents should be automatically the property of the nation, not just NASA. I think they are falling short of even a minimally acceptable standard.

                                        Since NASA only gets about half of one percent of the federal budget, why not let them try to make some more fundage?

                                        Because it isn't fundage, it's limiting what we have paid for only to big companies. It's stuff that the public has already paid for. If only big companies can access it, they are then using our tax dollars to withhold our own technology from us so that they can force us to pay for something we already paid for.

                                        RojoLocoR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • coliverC
                                          coliver
                                          last edited by

                                          Sorry, this was what I meant to post not sure how I got the previous link.

                                          https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-makes-dozens-of-patents-available-in-public-domain-to-benefit-us-industry

                                          Overall I agree with @scottalanmiller, NASA has often operated as an R&D department for big/wealthy companies. I would love to see their entire patent portfolio turn into public domain.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                                          • RojoLocoR
                                            RojoLoco @scottalanmiller
                                            last edited by

                                            @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                            @RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                            @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                            @coliver said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                            http://technology.nasa.gov/patents

                                            Good for NASA.

                                            Sort of. Their site says that their patents "benefits American citizens" but then say that "companies can license them." So basically, they are just acting like any business selling patent licensing. It's not like they are opening their portfolio or using it to promote non-aggression. Really, as a part of the government, they shouldn't even be allowed to have patents and/or their patents should be automatically the property of the nation, not just NASA. I think they are falling short of even a minimally acceptable standard.

                                            Since NASA only gets about half of one percent of the federal budget, why not let them try to make some more fundage?

                                            Because it isn't fundage, it's limiting what we have paid for only to big companies. It's stuff that the public has already paid for. If only big companies can access it, they are then using our tax dollars to withhold our own technology from us so that they can force us to pay for something we already paid for.

                                            My point is that NASA is severely under funded. We can only afford to send our astronauts to the ISS by launching them from Chechnya. If NASA's budget remains the same, it will be Richard Branson and Elon Musk that put colonies on the moon or Mars (a necessity because we have severely f@cked this planet over).

                                            tonyshowoffT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 557
                                            • 558
                                            • 559
                                            • 560
                                            • 561
                                            • 560 / 561
                                            • First post
                                              Last post