ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    VSphere 5.5 and Virtual Flash Cache / Device - Do You Use It?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    16 Posts 5 Posters 3.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • NetworkNerdN
      NetworkNerd
      last edited by

      It is a no-go for us. It seems you must have Enterprise Plus: http://www.vmware.com/products/vsphere/compare. I should have checked there before posting. Maybe someone else will find this helpful.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • NaraN
        Nara
        last edited by

        If you have 3 hosts, why not use vSAN? You'll get crazy IOPS, as well as have your data stored across multiple hosts.

        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @Nara
          last edited by

          @Nara said:

          If you have 3 hosts, why not use vSAN? You'll get crazy IOPS, as well as have your data stored across multiple hosts.

          That's definitely the way to go!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            It's using Cisco UCS that gets you. You give up the amazing performance of Dell or HP with things like CacheCade built in. All that unnecessary FCoE stuff to get out to the disk arrays.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DashrenderD
              Dashrender
              last edited by

              Does VMWare just know how to use CacheCade and other Caching tech to make your servers faster? or do you have to tell it how to set it up? Assuming the VM's are 100's of gigs in size, the Cachecade I'm guessing is only a few gigs, how does it decide what goes where?

              scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                last edited by

                @Dashrender said:

                Does VMWare just know how to use CacheCade and other Caching tech to make your servers faster?

                CacheCade is at the physical storage layer, inside the RAID encapsulation the same as your normal NVRAM cache. VMware has no means of being aware of it. The same as it doesn't know how much RAM the controller has or how many disks are in your array. It just all appears as "an array."

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                  last edited by

                  @Dashrender said:

                  Assuming the VM's are 100's of gigs in size, the Cachecade I'm guessing is only a few gigs, how does it decide what goes where?

                  NVRAM is normally 1GB+. CacheCade would rarely be under 200GB and could easily be 500GB.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    CacheCade is a cache, it decides what stays there in the same way that the RAID cache has always decided that and in the same way that the OS decides what to cache.

                    DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DashrenderD
                      Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller said:

                      CacheCade is a cache, it decides what stays there in the same way that the RAID cache has always decided that and in the same way that the OS decides what to cache.

                      Awww.. Thanks for that! CacheCade is Dell, what does HP have?

                      scottalanmillerS NaraN 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                        last edited by

                        @Dashrender said:

                        @scottalanmiller said:

                        CacheCade is a cache, it decides what stays there in the same way that the RAID cache has always decided that and in the same way that the OS decides what to cache.

                        Awww.. Thanks for that! CacheCade is Dell, what does HP have?

                        CacheCade is LSI who makes for both.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          HP calls it SmartCache

                          http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/servers/proliantstorage/arraycontrollers/smartcache/index.html

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • ryan from xbyteR
                            ryan from xbyte
                            last edited by

                            On the Dell side, be aware that you need the RAID controller with the 1GB NV RAM in order to enable cachecade on their servers. Both the H700 and H710P have the capabilities. Dell will tell you that you must use their SSD drives as the cachecade drives, but we have behnchmarked other SSD drives in our lab and verified that they work fine and achieve similar results.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • NaraN
                              Nara @Dashrender
                              last edited by

                              @Dashrender said:

                              @scottalanmiller said:

                              CacheCade is a cache, it decides what stays there in the same way that the RAID cache has always decided that and in the same way that the OS decides what to cache.

                              Awww.. Thanks for that! CacheCade is Dell, what does HP have?

                              Up to 4GB on-controller Flash-Backed Write Cache (FBWC) - unless I'm doing some extremely large data moves, it feels like I'm writing to flash, even under typical VM workloads.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • 1 / 1
                              • First post
                                Last post