ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Reconsidering ProxMox

    IT Discussion
    kvm lxc proxmox
    32
    241
    33.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • black3dynamiteB
      black3dynamite
      last edited by

      After reading Proxmox documentation, I now know why my swap is more than my RAM when using a container image.

      If you assign your container 1GiB of RAM and 512 MiB of swap. The total swap is 1.5 GiB.

      SWAP (1.5 GiB) = RAM (1 GiB) + SWAP (512 MiB)

      https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Linux_Container#pct_settings
      40d79509-63f9-4a01-8368-f8639b9315a0-image.png

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • FATeknollogeeF
        FATeknollogee
        last edited by

        Spun up a nested Proxmox instance.
        Really liking the built-in backup & the fact that I can snapshot a UEFI vm!

        black3dynamiteB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • black3dynamiteB
          black3dynamite @FATeknollogee
          last edited by

          @FATeknollogee said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

          Spun up a nested Proxmox instance.
          Really liking the built-in backup & the fact that I can snapshot a UEFI vm!

          I think its only possible because of using LVM snapshot.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • black3dynamiteB
            black3dynamite
            last edited by black3dynamite

            When using UEFI, it will add a EFI disk too.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • black3dynamiteB
              black3dynamite
              last edited by

              Proxmox full backup is not bad when your lxc containers is small.
              ce059a65-b1dc-4e4d-b46b-d4caa00ed4b3-image.png

              DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • DustinB3403D
                DustinB3403 @black3dynamite
                last edited by

                @black3dynamite What if you have massive containers though?

                black3dynamiteB stacksofplatesS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • black3dynamiteB
                  black3dynamite @DustinB3403
                  last edited by

                  @DustinB3403 said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                  @black3dynamite What if you have massive containers though?

                  I don't know since I don't use a lot of containers.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stacksofplatesS
                    stacksofplates @DustinB3403
                    last edited by

                    @DustinB3403 said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                    @black3dynamite What if you have massive containers though?

                    Who has that? What's a use case for massive containers?

                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @stacksofplates
                      last edited by

                      @stacksofplates said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                      @DustinB3403 said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                      @black3dynamite What if you have massive containers though?

                      Who has that? What's a use case for massive containers?

                      We do, for example. Not often, but when we need storage, containers are still better than a full VM if you don't need the extra overhead.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • warren.stanleyW
                        warren.stanley
                        last edited by

                        After adjusting the updates to the pve-no-subscription repo and updating (full-upgrade), I had an issue where no templates for Containers were available on the host, to "Download" (under pve -> local (pve) -> "Content" -> "Templates").

                        Apparently the list of available templates is updated daily through the "pve-daily-update timer".

                        I triggered and update manually (cause i'm impatient) via:

                        root@pve:~# pveam update
                        

                        ...you can then check the list via:

                        root@pve:~# pveam available
                        

                        And then I had templates to use under pve -> local (pve) -> "Content" -> "Templates".

                        Just spinning up a Debian 10 CT and VM now.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • mroth911M
                          mroth911
                          last edited by

                          PROXMOX with LIZARD FS? ANYONE SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED IT.

                          stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stacksofplatesS
                            stacksofplates @mroth911
                            last edited by stacksofplates

                            @mroth911 said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                            PROXMOX with LIZARD FS? ANYONE SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED IT.

                            I have not (but haven't tried). It doesn't appear to be a supported thing from ProxMox. They don't reference it anywhere, only LizardFS does. It's all CLI driven it looks like. Doesn't look like you get any GUI control like with Ceph.

                            LizardFS mentions in their documentation that they run the chunk server on the ProxMox nodes in functional testing, developemnt, and "some private setups" using LXC containers as the chunk server. So it doesn't sound like it's a recommended thing to do. I'm not sure in the other setup whether they have the chunk servers as completely separate physical machines or if it's a VM with QoS for the disks or something else. Not much out there on it.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              We've been deploying more and more Proxmox and so far, knock on wood, we are remaining happy.

                              coliverC B 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • CloudKnightC
                                CloudKnight
                                last edited by

                                I'm quite happy with it as well, I've deployed a couple of production servers using proxmox and all good so far as well

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • coliverC
                                  coliver @scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  @scottalanmiller said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                                  We've been deploying more and more Proxmox and so far, knock on wood, we are remaining happy.

                                  Are you deploying multi-node setups or just single nodes?

                                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller @coliver
                                    last edited by

                                    @coliver said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                                    @scottalanmiller said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                                    We've been deploying more and more Proxmox and so far, knock on wood, we are remaining happy.

                                    Are you deploying multi-node setups or just single nodes?

                                    Single node. It's a rare customer that would need more than one node.

                                    coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • coliverC
                                      coliver @scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      @scottalanmiller said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                                      @coliver said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                                      @scottalanmiller said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                                      We've been deploying more and more Proxmox and so far, knock on wood, we are remaining happy.

                                      Are you deploying multi-node setups or just single nodes?

                                      Single node. It's a rare customer that would need more than one node.

                                      Got it.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • travisdh1T
                                        travisdh1 @black3dynamite
                                        last edited by

                                        @black3dynamite said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                                        To get rid of the no subscription message pop up
                                        5c7671bd-a9e1-482a-ad22-830513c43fe7-image.png

                                        https://johnscs.com/remove-proxmox51-subscription-notice/

                                        sed -i.bak "s/data.status !== 'Active'/false/g" /usr/share/javascript/proxmox-widget-toolkit/proxmoxlib.js && systemctl restart pveproxy.service
                                        

                                        Clear your browser cache.

                                        Just did this today, still working. TYVM

                                        black3dynamiteB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                        • black3dynamiteB
                                          black3dynamite @travisdh1
                                          last edited by

                                          @travisdh1 said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                                          @black3dynamite said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                                          To get rid of the no subscription message pop up
                                          5c7671bd-a9e1-482a-ad22-830513c43fe7-image.png

                                          https://johnscs.com/remove-proxmox51-subscription-notice/

                                          sed -i.bak "s/data.status !== 'Active'/false/g" /usr/share/javascript/proxmox-widget-toolkit/proxmoxlib.js && systemctl restart pveproxy.service
                                          

                                          Clear your browser cache.

                                          Just did this today, still working. TYVM

                                          This will make the changes after an update/upgrade.
                                          https://github.com/foundObjects/pve-nag-buster

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • B
                                            biggen @scottalanmiller
                                            last edited by biggen

                                            @scottalanmiller What’s your storage configuration like?

                                            I’ve been playing with it on ZFS Raid 1 mirror. Proxmox OS and VMs all on same mirror. Performance is “OK”. Not as good as MD with same setup though.

                                            Wonder if it’s better to create separate Raid 1 ZFS pools. One for the Proxmox OS and one for the VMs.

                                            V scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 12
                                            • 13
                                            • 3 / 13
                                            • First post
                                              Last post