ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Trading a VPN for an SSH Tunnel

    IT Discussion
    ssh tunnel ssh vnc
    9
    23
    2.0k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • JaredBuschJ
      JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
      last edited by JaredBusch

      @scottalanmiller said in Trading a VPN for an SSH Tunnel:

      @JasGot said in Trading a VPN for an SSH Tunnel:

      @scottalanmiller said in Trading a VPN for an SSH Tunnel:

      @JasGot said in Trading a VPN for an SSH Tunnel:

      Put a RouterBoardOS RB260GS at each house and use a free ddns service. $35each and yo're done.
      Or a Ubiquiti Edge Router Lite will work too, just more expensive.
      I use the Ubiquiti ERL for IPSec into my house from the office, my phone, and my laptop. Love it.

      All more work and more money than easy and free.

      Easy is relative. $70 for the two is only $10 more than he is currently paying for one year. Starting with month 15, it is free!

      Comparing to a bad decision is misleading. You have to throw money away today, and ignore better options, to them create the "savings" of spending money. That's a false decision matrix.

      The real comparison is against something free. That's the baseline to beat. Otherwise, nothing is costly compared to any contrived more expensive decision.

      Example: I want a laser light show for my house, I don't need it, I just want it. The free option is to not buy one. Buying one is normally $100. But I could find one that is $200 and then say that the $100 is "free" or even "saving me money." But this is false, it's still costing $100 no matter how many more expensive alternatives we find.

      It's like the 'sale' problem. The shirt was on sale for 50% off, I saved 50%!! No, you still bought a shirt you didn't need, money was lost versus the free baseline.

      Except I need the shirt. No one wants to see me topless. I proved that back in January.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
      • jt1001001J
        jt1001001
        last edited by

        Oldish thread looks like you found a solution using ZeroTier. Has anyone done something similar using SoftEther VPN? I am looking at a SoftEther setup (not by me) trying to figure it out; looks likkey they have asome soft of cloud server and are bridging the VPN's to make a large network.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stacksofplatesS
          stacksofplates @scottalanmiller
          last edited by stacksofplates

          @scottalanmiller said in Trading a VPN for an SSH Tunnel:

          @JasGot said in Trading a VPN for an SSH Tunnel:

          @scottalanmiller said in Trading a VPN for an SSH Tunnel:

          @JasGot said in Trading a VPN for an SSH Tunnel:

          Put a RouterBoardOS RB260GS at each house and use a free ddns service. $35each and yo're done.
          Or a Ubiquiti Edge Router Lite will work too, just more expensive.
          I use the Ubiquiti ERL for IPSec into my house from the office, my phone, and my laptop. Love it.

          All more work and more money than easy and free.

          Easy is relative. $70 for the two is only $10 more than he is currently paying for one year. Starting with month 15, it is free!

          Comparing to a bad decision is misleading. You have to throw money away today, and ignore better options, to them create the "savings" of spending money. That's a false decision matrix.

          The real comparison is against something free. That's the baseline to beat. Otherwise, nothing is costly compared to any contrived more expensive decision.

          Example: I want a laser light show for my house, I don't need it, I just want it. The free option is to not buy one. Buying one is normally $100. But I could find one that is $200 and then say that the $100 is "free" or even "saving me money." But this is false, it's still costing $100 no matter how many more expensive alternatives we find.

          It's like the 'sale' problem. The shirt was on sale for 50% off, I saved 50%!! No, you still bought a shirt you didn't need, money was lost versus the free baseline.

          The wife gets mad when I tell her you save 100% if you don't buy anything.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
          • 1
          • 2
          • 2 / 2
          • First post
            Last post