ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect

    IT Discussion
    remote access screenconnect meshcentral meshcentral 2 connectwise control connectwise
    39
    980
    215.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      smartkid808 @JaredBusch
      last edited by

      @JaredBusch said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

      @smartkid808 said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

      One thing that would be nice would be to have the remote machine automatically lock when you press disconnect. Prob best to set it per-machine.

      Per machine is a horrible idea for anything with a tool like this.
      Per group is where this type of setting should be.

      As for your thought. Make an issue. I don't see one for this feature request.
      https://github.com/Ylianst/MeshCentral/issues

      Yea, group sounds better.. Will do.. tnx

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        If things like that are going to be by group, I think we need way more powerful group management. Right now, we heavily limit the use of groups because it is a pain to have any number of users and groups because you have to add and remove people from every group.

        JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • JaredBuschJ
          JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
          last edited by JaredBusch

          @scottalanmiller said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

          If things like that are going to be by group, I think we need way more powerful group management. Right now, we heavily limit the use of groups because it is a pain to have any number of users and groups because you have to add and remove people from every group.

          That means MC is useless. No tool like this should be lacking group controls. I group by Client because not all techs need access to all clients. Some clients have different settings than others. One client requires consent on connect, one wants only the pop up, one doesn't care, etc.

          Adding users to groups is actually a problem I made an issue for a while back.
          https://github.com/Ylianst/MeshCentral/issues/185

          Since then, two more related issues for controlling things with groups and users.
          https://github.com/Ylianst/MeshCentral/issues/210
          https://github.com/Ylianst/MeshCentral/issues/256

          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
            last edited by

            @JaredBusch said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

            That means MC is useless. No tool like this should be lacking group controls.

            It HAS group controls, it's just that the time to manage them is too long so we don't do it in a granular fashion. We only do it for security groups.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • YlianY
              Ylian
              last edited by Ylian

              FYI. Just published @MeshCentral v0.3.5-x with new agent installation invitation link system. You can create a time limited link and send it to users who get agent installation instructions. In agent installation page supports many OS's and tries to detect the browser's OS to be on the right starting tab (Picture below). This had been requested earlier in this thread, feedback on this appreciated.

              And yes, I do need to work on improved group management. I am certainly keeping busy.

              MC2-AgentInvitationLink.png

              black3dynamiteB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 7
              • black3dynamiteB
                black3dynamite @Ylian
                last edited by

                @Ylian said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                FYI. Just published @MeshCentral v0.3.5-x with new agent installation invitation link system. You can create a time limited link and send it to users who get agent installation instructions. In agent installation page supports many OS's and tries to detect the browser's OS to be on the right starting tab (Picture below). This had been requested earlier in this thread, feedback on this appreciated.

                And yes, I do need to work on improved group management. I am certainly keeping busy.

                MC2-AgentInvitationLink.png

                Success! I use the Link Invitation to help a co-worker.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                • CloudKnightC
                  CloudKnight
                  last edited by CloudKnight

                  This issue is concerning if antivirus software is removing the agents it's detecting mc as a false positive.
                  https://github.com/Ylianst/MeshCentral/issues/296

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @CloudKnight
                    last edited by

                    @StuartJordan said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                    This issue is concerning if antivirus software is removing the agents it's detecting mc as a false positive.
                    https://github.com/Ylianst/MeshCentral/issues/296

                    Major concern with the AV products. Find whatever that is and remove it. Stick with Defender!!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      On 0.3.6-i now.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        Scott Banned
                        last edited by

                        On 0.3.6-i as well.

                        Installed on client via the invite feature and Desktop does not work on newly installed client.

                        Also, with each new install, Duplicate Agent count under Agent Error Counters goes up by one.

                        black3dynamiteB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • black3dynamiteB
                          black3dynamite @Scott
                          last edited by

                          @Scott said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                          On 0.3.6-i as well.

                          Installed on client via the invite feature and Desktop does not work on newly installed client.

                          Also, with each new install, Duplicate Agent count under Agent Error Counters goes up by one.

                          Is the newly installed client Windows 10 1903?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • S
                            Scott Banned
                            last edited by

                            6.1.7601

                            Windows 7

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • S
                              Scott Banned
                              last edited by

                              0.3.6-k; agent installed via the invite function.

                              Client shows agent connected; 7 Day power state for 6/12/2019 shows connected 12:00:00 to 09:14:42am (it is now 12:18pm).

                              Connecting to desktop sometimes proceeds and says Connected, but no image is displayed; sometimes attempting to connect to desktop states "Setup..." and no image is displayed. Same with Terminal and Files: either says Connected or Setup... yet nothing connects.

                              For those using this in production to service clients, is there some secret here to get this to work consistently?

                              black3dynamiteB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • black3dynamiteB
                                black3dynamite @Scott
                                last edited by

                                @Scott said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                                0.3.6-k; agent installed via the invite function.

                                Client shows agent connected; 7 Day power state for 6/12/2019 shows connected 12:00:00 to 09:14:42am (it is now 12:18pm).

                                Connecting to desktop sometimes proceeds and says Connected, but no image is displayed; sometimes attempting to connect to desktop states "Setup..." and no image is displayed. Same with Terminal and Files: either says Connected or Setup... yet nothing connects.

                                For those using this in production to service clients, is there some secret here to get this to work consistently?

                                It's been too random for me. It works fine when connecting to Linux systems.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • S
                                  Scott Banned
                                  last edited by

                                  I was wondering if it is me. I have heard great things about this from people using it to service clients and who are switching from other remote access solutions, but I find it too random for me to use.

                                  When it works, it's great.

                                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller @Scott
                                    last edited by

                                    @Scott said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                                    I was wondering if it is me. I have heard great things about this from people using it to service clients and who are switching from other remote access solutions, but I find it too random for me to use.

                                    When it works, it's great.

                                    In our case, we almost always control the environments that it is going into. So things like AV problems don't arise for us.

                                    CloudKnightC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • CloudKnightC
                                      CloudKnight @scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      @scottalanmiller I get this, sometimes you may not be able to change the current A/V solution they are using though. This is still an issue.

                                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • YlianY
                                        Ylian
                                        last edited by Ylian

                                        Starting with MeshCentral v0.3.6-m, both the 32bit and 64bit MeshAgents should no longer report as a problem with any anti-virus. Both get a perfect score on virustotal.com. Update your server and you should be fine.

                                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                        • YlianY
                                          Ylian
                                          last edited by

                                          Quick note that MeshCentral v0.3.6-n just got published with remote user consent support for remote desktop, terminal and file access. The remote user prompt will work on Windows, MacOS and many Linux distributions. This is a much improved MeshAgent, so lots of fixes. Enjoy and of course, feedback appreciated.

                                          MC2-UserConsent.png
                                          MC2-UserConsent2.png

                                          JaredBuschJ CloudKnightC 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 6
                                          • JaredBuschJ
                                            JaredBusch @Ylian
                                            last edited by

                                            @Ylian said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                                            Quick note that MeshCentral v0.3.6-n just got published with remote user consent support for remote desktop, terminal and file access. The remote user prompt will work on Windows, MacOS and many Linux distributions. This is a much improved MeshAgent, so lots of fixes. Enjoy and of course, feedback appreciated.

                                            Awesome.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 48
                                            • 49
                                            • 2 / 49
                                            • First post
                                              Last post