ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect

    IT Discussion
    remote access screenconnect meshcentral meshcentral 2 connectwise control connectwise
    39
    980
    215.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller @Ylian
      last edited by

      @Ylian said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

      @StuartJordan Just fixed that problem. Published v0.2.5-m a few minutes ago.

      Updating now.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • YlianY
        Ylian @bnrstnr
        last edited by

        @bnrstnr No WinCE support in MeshCentral. People still use that? I have not used WinCE since my last Nav system in my old car and my HP PocketPC a long time ago.

        B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          And we are on 0.2.5-m now.

          RomoR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • RomoR
            Romo @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

            And we are on 0.2.5-m now.

            Wondered why I was kicked out :smiling_face_with_open_mouth_cold_sweat:

            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • YlianY
              Ylian @syko24
              last edited by

              @syko24 For SMTP setup. When the server is started, it will perform a check of the SMTP server to make sure it's working. When running the server manually you should see the line "SMTP mail server... working as expected". If not, you should see an error. Can you try and report back what you see? - Thanks.

              mc-smtp.png

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @Romo
                last edited by

                @Romo said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                @scottalanmiller said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                And we are on 0.2.5-m now.

                Wondered why I was kicked out :smiling_face_with_open_mouth_cold_sweat:

                Oops

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • dafyreD
                  dafyre @Ylian
                  last edited by

                  @Ylian said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                  @StuartJordan Just fixed that problem. Published v0.2.5-m a few minutes ago.

                  Updated to 0.2.5-m here as well.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • B
                    bnrstnr @Ylian
                    last edited by

                    @Ylian said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                    @bnrstnr No WinCE support in MeshCentral. People still use that? I have not used WinCE since my last Nav system in my old car and my HP PocketPC a long time ago.

                    Unfortunately, yes, it's very common in manufacturing settings. We use machine operator interface terminals that have it installed on them. It would be awesome to have something like MeshCentral to support them.

                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @bnrstnr
                      last edited by

                      @bnrstnr said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                      @Ylian said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                      @bnrstnr No WinCE support in MeshCentral. People still use that? I have not used WinCE since my last Nav system in my old car and my HP PocketPC a long time ago.

                      Unfortunately, yes, it's very common in manufacturing settings. We use machine operator interface terminals that have it installed on them. It would be awesome to have something like MeshCentral to support them.

                      Windows CE is a different platform than Windows. Different kernel and OS. Requires different applications. You CAN make things that run on both, but almost no one does. There's no reasonable chance that any modern software will be made to work on CE, it's a dead OS that wasn't very useful or good when it was still around. It's only five years since the last one, but that was more of a maintenance update than really providing something meant to still be deployed.

                      B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        CE might run on non-AMD64 hardware, too. Eliminating any chance for MC to run there.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • B
                          bnrstnr @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          @scottalanmiller said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                          @bnrstnr said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                          @Ylian said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                          @bnrstnr No WinCE support in MeshCentral. People still use that? I have not used WinCE since my last Nav system in my old car and my HP PocketPC a long time ago.

                          Unfortunately, yes, it's very common in manufacturing settings. We use machine operator interface terminals that have it installed on them. It would be awesome to have something like MeshCentral to support them.

                          Windows CE is a different platform than Windows. Different kernel and OS. Requires different applications. You CAN make things that run on both, but almost no one does. There's no reasonable chance that any modern software will be made to work on CE, it's a dead OS that wasn't very useful or good when it was still around. It's only five years since the last one, but that was more of a maintenance update than really providing something meant to still be deployed.

                          The most recent ones might be running Windows 10 IoT? I'll have to look into it. But it's most likely some non-AMD64 hardware.

                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @bnrstnr
                            last edited by

                            @bnrstnr said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                            @scottalanmiller said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                            @bnrstnr said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                            @Ylian said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                            @bnrstnr No WinCE support in MeshCentral. People still use that? I have not used WinCE since my last Nav system in my old car and my HP PocketPC a long time ago.

                            Unfortunately, yes, it's very common in manufacturing settings. We use machine operator interface terminals that have it installed on them. It would be awesome to have something like MeshCentral to support them.

                            Windows CE is a different platform than Windows. Different kernel and OS. Requires different applications. You CAN make things that run on both, but almost no one does. There's no reasonable chance that any modern software will be made to work on CE, it's a dead OS that wasn't very useful or good when it was still around. It's only five years since the last one, but that was more of a maintenance update than really providing something meant to still be deployed.

                            The most recent ones might be running Windows 10 IoT? I'll have to look into it. But it's most likely some non-AMD64 hardware.

                            Windows 10 IoT is really Windows, not CE. Very different. That would probably work.

                            YlianY 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • YlianY
                              Ylian @scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              @scottalanmiller With Windows IoT the kernel is a bit different, but it's possible we could support it. The main issue we got in the past was that we had to strip out a lot of agent features to make it work. Really no way we could with WinCE, it's too insane to get the development tools and do that work for that one.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                And 0.2.5-p update is out... and installed.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  And now 0.2.5-q

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • Reid CooperR
                                    Reid Cooper
                                    last edited by

                                    Just the regularity of updates makes it pretty impressive.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      Just updated to 0.2.5-r

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • scottalanmillerS
                                        scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by

                                        ElementaryOS 5 tested. Works great.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • scottalanmillerS
                                          scottalanmiller
                                          last edited by

                                          0.2.5-u just installed here.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • scottalanmillerS
                                            scottalanmiller
                                            last edited by

                                            And now 0.2.5-v

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 12
                                            • 13
                                            • 14
                                            • 15
                                            • 16
                                            • 48
                                            • 49
                                            • 14 / 49
                                            • First post
                                              Last post