ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On

    IT Discussion
    kvm hypervisor virtualization fedora linux ubuntu centos rhel suse opensuse
    16
    138
    16.1k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • JaredBuschJ
      JaredBusch @DustinB3403
      last edited by

      @DustinB3403 said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

      @scottalanmiller said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

      @DustinB3403 said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

      Agentless isn't the factor I'm sticking on. It's how do I create a complete system, agentless, agent based (some new magic), management interface scaling, migration etc.

      Complete system includes everything. SO many things that aren't virtualization. There is no end to what we'd have to consider under that scope.

      You are now mixing the guest OS and the virtual hardware it runs on. I'm specifically discussing a complete hypervisor stack.

      What is the:

      • Hypervisor?
      • Backup method
      • Restoration procedure

      Among about a million other talking points, that while small things, still need to be understood.

      Because to @scottalanmiller backups have nothing to do with the hypervisor.

      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
        last edited by

        @JaredBusch said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

        @DustinB3403 said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

        @scottalanmiller said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

        @DustinB3403 said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

        Agentless isn't the factor I'm sticking on. It's how do I create a complete system, agentless, agent based (some new magic), management interface scaling, migration etc.

        Complete system includes everything. SO many things that aren't virtualization. There is no end to what we'd have to consider under that scope.

        You are now mixing the guest OS and the virtual hardware it runs on. I'm specifically discussing a complete hypervisor stack.

        What is the:

        • Hypervisor?
        • Backup method
        • Restoration procedure

        Among about a million other talking points, that while small things, still need to be understood.

        Because to @scottalanmiller backups have nothing to do with the hypervisor.

        Correct, they are their own thing. Just like the operating systems you run on top of the hypervisor are their own thing. Like everything in IT, they work together, but the switches, routers, backups,, are their own things, not "parts of the hypervisors."

        Unless you have Scale that includes it.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
          last edited by

          @DustinB3403 said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

          @scottalanmiller said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

          @DustinB3403 said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

          Agentless isn't the factor I'm sticking on. It's how do I create a complete system, agentless, agent based (some new magic), management interface scaling, migration etc.

          Complete system includes everything. SO many things that aren't virtualization. There is no end to what we'd have to consider under that scope.

          You are now mixing the guest OS and the virtual hardware it runs on. I'm specifically discussing a complete hypervisor stack.

          What is the:

          • Hypervisor?
          • Backup method
          • Restoration procedure

          Among about a million other talking points, that while small things, still need to be understood.

          I backup and restore workloads, not platforms. I think confusing the infrastructure to run workloads on with the workloads themselves actually undermines that planning process.

          Especially in a world where you might not be all on one hypervisor. What happens if you have to include cloud, physical, colo, and on premises hypervisors all in a single strategy?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @Obsolesce
            last edited by

            @Obsolesce said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

            @scottalanmiller said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

            @DustinB3403 said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

            If Cockpit had functionality "export a backup to <insert remote>" right there I wouldn't be as I have been. Because, you need something additional.

            Who else has that command?

            Hyper-V Server does have WSB semi built in, it's an additional feature you need to enable. After that it's simple commands or remotely via the GUI.

            But why export backup? Backups should already be off the host...

            Well, the exporting is what turns a snapshot into a backup, in a sense.

            ObsolesceO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DustinB3403D
              DustinB3403
              last edited by

              What does backing up a workload mean to you?

              I backup everything so I can restore to whatever, whenever. That is my workload. Whatever gets me back to operational, hypervisor excluded.

              scottalanmillerS JaredBuschJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
                last edited by

                @DustinB3403 said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

                What does backing up a workload mean to you?

                I backup everything so I can restore to whatever, whenever. That is my workload. Whatever gets me back to operational, hypervisor excluded.

                Workload is "what is presented to the end user."

                With your strategy, let's say your hardware fails, your hypervisor is gone, company decides to restore to a cloud location. What's your restore strategy?

                When using agents, this is normally really easy. It's the same as any other restore. For those doing agentless, there are options, but it becomes less obvious.

                DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DustinB3403D
                  DustinB3403 @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

                  @DustinB3403 said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

                  What does backing up a workload mean to you?

                  I backup everything so I can restore to whatever, whenever. That is my workload. Whatever gets me back to operational, hypervisor excluded.

                  Workload is "what is presented to the end user."

                  With your strategy, let's say your hardware fails, your hypervisor is gone, company decides to restore to a cloud location. What's your restore strategy?

                  When using agents, this is normally really easy. It's the same as any other restore. For those doing agentless, there are options, but it becomes less obvious.

                  From the user perspective, they don't care what is presented to them, so long as they can work.

                  So your stance is "the user should see nothing different". . . So is mine.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DustinB3403D
                    DustinB3403
                    last edited by

                    And like with any hypervisor any cloud provider has options to migrate to them.

                    Migration away on the other hand is a different conversation.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • JaredBuschJ
                      JaredBusch @DustinB3403
                      last edited by

                      @DustinB3403 said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

                      What does backing up a workload mean to you?

                      I backup everything so I can restore to whatever, whenever. That is my workload. Whatever gets me back to operational, hypervisor excluded.

                      It means he is changing the scope to suit his point of view.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • dbeatoD
                        dbeato
                        last edited by

                        And you didn't give XCP-ng a chance?

                        JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • JaredBuschJ
                          JaredBusch @dbeato
                          last edited by

                          @dbeato said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

                          And you didn't give XCP-ng a chance?

                          Are you asking me? Of course not. It didn't exist 6 years ago.

                          dbeatoD DustinB3403D 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • ObsolesceO
                            Obsolesce @scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            @scottalanmiller said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

                            @Obsolesce said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

                            @scottalanmiller said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

                            @DustinB3403 said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

                            If Cockpit had functionality "export a backup to <insert remote>" right there I wouldn't be as I have been. Because, you need something additional.

                            Who else has that command?

                            Hyper-V Server does have WSB semi built in, it's an additional feature you need to enable. After that it's simple commands or remotely via the GUI.

                            But why export backup? Backups should already be off the host...

                            Well, the exporting is what turns a snapshot into a backup, in a sense.

                            Oh is that what he meant.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • dbeatoD
                              dbeato @JaredBusch
                              last edited by

                              @JaredBusch said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

                              @dbeato said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

                              And you didn't give XCP-ng a chance?

                              Are you asking me? Of course not. It didn't exist 6 years ago.

                              No, I was asking to the OP, XenServer was prior to that but we all know how we felt as soon as 7.1 changes came.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • DustinB3403D
                                DustinB3403 @JaredBusch
                                last edited by DustinB3403

                                @JaredBusch said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

                                @dbeato said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

                                And you didn't give XCP-ng a chance?

                                Are you asking me? Of course not. It didn't exist 6 years ago.

                                But you still haven't and continue to piss and moan about XS/XCP-ng and XO as "being my toy". Yet you refuse to try them, at least publicly. (which I haven't made either, besides working to make XO more accessible).

                                I'd really be interested in a review of XCP-ng and XO from @JaredBusch

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                • CloudKnightC
                                  CloudKnight
                                  last edited by

                                  I'm now using XCP-NG, have no issues with whoever uses what for their hypervisor.. this is a more viable solution then KVM in my eyes.

                                  DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                  • DustinB3403D
                                    DustinB3403 @CloudKnight
                                    last edited by

                                    @StuartJordan said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

                                    I'm now using XCP-NG, have no issues with whoever uses what for their hypervisor.. this is a more viable solution then KVM in my eyes.

                                    To be the devil's advocate. Why is XCP-ng a more viable solution to you over KVM?

                                    CloudKnightC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • CloudKnightC
                                      CloudKnight @DustinB3403
                                      last edited by

                                      @DustinB3403 - Quick Install with no fuss, snapshot and snapshot schedules, backup with Xen Orchestra.. just nice and easy to use with no fuss just like a hypervisor should be.

                                      I've used KVM with Virt Manager and remember it had issues sometimes connecting with Spice or Vnc...just didn't seem quite as polished in my eyes...

                                      DustinB3403D black3dynamiteB 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • DustinB3403D
                                        DustinB3403 @CloudKnight
                                        last edited by

                                        @StuartJordan so just a general lack of polish on the platform as a whole.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • black3dynamiteB
                                          black3dynamite @CloudKnight
                                          last edited by

                                          @StuartJordan said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

                                          @DustinB3403 - Quick Install with no fuss, snapshot and snapshot schedules, backup with Xen Orchestra.. just nice and easy to use with no fuss just like a hypervisor should be.

                                          I've used KVM with Virt Manager and remember it had issues sometimes connecting with Spice or Vnc...just didn't seem quite as polished in my eyes...

                                          Would you still use it without Xen Orchestra?
                                          I asked because I feel Xen Orchestra has a big part in making an individual to use XenServer/XCP-ng.

                                          B DustinB3403D 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                          • B
                                            bnrstnr @black3dynamite
                                            last edited by

                                            @black3dynamite said in Why I Feel KVM Is the Easiest HyperVisor to Learn the Basics On:

                                            Would you still use it without Xen Orchestra?
                                            I asked because I feel Xen Orchestra has a big part in making an individual to use XenServer/XCP-ng.

                                            I would definitely not use XCP-ng without XO. I would probably use Hyper-V and Veeam otherwise.

                                            I want to try KVM, but I don't have time to figure out the backup stuff right now. Maybe it's time I switch my home lab over to KVM.

                                            black3dynamiteB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 6
                                            • 7
                                            • 2 / 7
                                            • First post
                                              Last post