ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service

    News
    quad9 dns security ars technica
    13
    46
    4.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • coliverC
      coliver @scottalanmiller
      last edited by coliver

      @scottalanmiller said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:

      @rojoloco said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:

      Got Damn.... this whole thread needs to realize that the police are always out to get anything they can on anyone, anytime. Don't play into their game. Don't feed the beast.

      And remember, the cops are above the law. Sure the state can go after them if it wants to but as a citizen you have no recourse. So law enforcement agencies are free to lie about their website policies and theree is nothing you can do if they break them. A statement from law enforcement that they won't break the law means nothing. You literally can't trust them, there is no basis for trust.

      Law Enforcement also operates on the notion that "Everyone is guilty until they are proven innocent." Going against many of the tenants of how our justice system is supposed to function. It really brings in an "Us vs Them" mentality that is kind of scary.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • coliverC
        coliver @Obsolesce
        last edited by

        @tim_g said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:

        And for those who are criminals... good, I'm glad it was recorded to help put them away!

        I guess you're for government and law enforcement agents putting a backdoor into encryption tools to ensure "the good guys" can unlock them?

        ObsolesceO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • ObsolesceO
          Obsolesce @coliver
          last edited by

          @coliver said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:

          @tim_g said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:

          And for those who are criminals... good, I'm glad it was recorded to help put them away!

          I guess you're for government and law enforcement agents putting a backdoor into encryption tools to ensure "the good guys" can unlock them?

          No, that's not the same thing.

          JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • JaredBuschJ
            JaredBusch @Obsolesce
            last edited by

            @tim_g said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:

            @coliver said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:

            @tim_g said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:

            And for those who are criminals... good, I'm glad it was recorded to help put them away!

            I guess you're for government and law enforcement agents putting a backdoor into encryption tools to ensure "the good guys" can unlock them?

            No, that's not the same thing.

            HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

            coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • coliverC
              coliver @JaredBusch
              last edited by

              @jaredbusch said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:

              @tim_g said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:

              @coliver said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:

              @tim_g said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:

              And for those who are criminals... good, I'm glad it was recorded to help put them away!

              I guess you're for government and law enforcement agents putting a backdoor into encryption tools to ensure "the good guys" can unlock them?

              No, that's not the same thing.

              HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

              I'm with @JaredBusch I don't see how the two are different.

              ObsolesceO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ObsolesceO
                Obsolesce @coliver
                last edited by

                @coliver said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:

                @jaredbusch said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:

                @tim_g said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:

                @coliver said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:

                @tim_g said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:

                And for those who are criminals... good, I'm glad it was recorded to help put them away!

                I guess you're for government and law enforcement agents putting a backdoor into encryption tools to ensure "the good guys" can unlock them?

                No, that's not the same thing.

                HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                I'm with @JaredBusch I don't see how the two are different.

                How is adding a back door to all encryption everywhere (no choice given) relate to a hypothetical possibility of an optional open DNS protection service logging which dns names you need resolved to IP addresses?

                Apples and oranges there...

                DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • travisdh1T
                  travisdh1 @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:

                  @rojoloco said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:

                  Got Damn.... this whole thread needs to realize that the police are always out to get anything they can on anyone, anytime. Don't play into their game. Don't feed the beast.

                  And remember, the cops are above the law. Sure the state can go after them if it wants to but as a citizen you have no recourse. So law enforcement agencies are free to lie about their website policies and theree is nothing you can do if they break them. A statement from law enforcement that they won't break the law means nothing. You literally can't trust them, there is no basis for trust.

                  Their job is lying in order to get people to incriminate themselves.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • DashrenderD
                    Dashrender @Obsolesce
                    last edited by

                    @tim_g said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:

                    @coliver said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:

                    @jaredbusch said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:

                    @tim_g said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:

                    @coliver said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:

                    @tim_g said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:

                    And for those who are criminals... good, I'm glad it was recorded to help put them away!

                    I guess you're for government and law enforcement agents putting a backdoor into encryption tools to ensure "the good guys" can unlock them?

                    No, that's not the same thing.

                    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                    I'm with @JaredBusch I don't see how the two are different.

                    How is adding a back door to all encryption everywhere (no choice given) relate to a hypothetical possibility of an optional open DNS protection service logging which dns names you need resolved to IP addresses?

                    Apples and oranges there...

                    It's really about surveillance. Do you subscribe to them surveying you when you have options that are less likely to allow them to do so?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      I wonder how many of the agencies that used ComputerCop are behind this new scheme?

                      https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/11/treasury-inspector-general-concludes-fraud-investigation-computercop-internet

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • ObsolesceO
                        Obsolesce
                        last edited by

                        I stopped testing Quad9 on my computer. I've been having some weird issues with GitLab errors on the website. As soon as I plugged in Google's DNS, it worked.

                        But then again, a refresh or two got it working again while I was still using Quad9.

                        I'll update later to report if any issue like that returns now that I'm using Google on my computer.

                        ObsolesceO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • ObsolesceO
                          Obsolesce @Obsolesce
                          last edited by

                          @tim_g said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:

                          I stopped testing Quad9 on my computer. I've been having some weird issues with GitLab errors on the website. As soon as I plugged in Google's DNS, it worked.

                          But then again, a refresh or two got it working again while I was still using Quad9.

                          I'll update later to report if any issue like that returns now that I'm using Google on my computer.

                          Nope, was not Quad9 related.

                          I think it's some kind of timeout I never noticed before or GitLab is having issues.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • 1
                          • 2
                          • 3
                          • 3 / 3
                          • First post
                            Last post