ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    MS Licensing - 3rd

    IT Discussion
    hyper-v microsoft licensing
    6
    63
    4.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller @bnrstnr
      last edited by

      @bnrstnr said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

      None of this really helps the OP, because SA does not get you Remote Access rights at all... and I'm sure there are rules that make it very clear that you cant skip server OSes just because you have SA and RDS CALs

      Actualy it does, remote access rights are one of hte largest features of SA.

      B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DashrenderD
        Dashrender @bnrstnr
        last edited by

        @bnrstnr said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

        None of this really helps the OP, because SA does not get you Remote Access rights at all... and I'm sure there are rules that make it very clear that you cant skip server OSes just because you have SA and RDS CALs

        What do you mean skip server OSes? SA and RDS CALs in this case would only be applying to the desktop OS, not the server.

        B scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • B
          bnrstnr @scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          @scottalanmiller Ah, I just assumed it didn't, we weren't getting SA for remote access reasons so I didn't really read into that portion of it.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • B
            bnrstnr @Dashrender
            last edited by bnrstnr

            @dashrender said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

            What do you mean skip server OSes? SA and RDS CALs in this case would only be applying to the desktop OS, not the server.

            I meant it as deploying the W10 would be skipping the purchase of another server license

            scottalanmillerS DashrenderD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @Dashrender
              last edited by

              @dashrender said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

              @bnrstnr said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

              None of this really helps the OP, because SA does not get you Remote Access rights at all... and I'm sure there are rules that make it very clear that you cant skip server OSes just because you have SA and RDS CALs

              What do you mean skip server OSes? SA and RDS CALs in this case would only be applying to the desktop OS, not the server.

              RDS can never apply to a desktop, only to a server. There is conceptually no such thing as an RDS for a desktop, not sure what you are picturing.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @bnrstnr
                last edited by

                @bnrstnr said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                @dashrender said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                What do you mean skip server OSes? SA and RDS CALs in this case would only be applying to the desktop OS, not the server.

                I meant it as deploying the W10 would be skipping the purchase of another server OS license

                If you get some form of VDI icensing, you can skip server licensing. No server licensing is needed for VDI. Server licensing is just generally cheaper thatn VDI.

                DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DashrenderD
                  Dashrender @bnrstnr
                  last edited by

                  @bnrstnr said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                  @dashrender said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                  What do you mean skip server OSes? SA and RDS CALs in this case would only be applying to the desktop OS, not the server.

                  I meant it as deploying the W10 would be skipping the purchase of another server license

                  Correct, you wouldn't need a Windows Server license if you are running your app inside Windows 10 VMs using SA RDS CALs.

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DashrenderD
                    Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    @scottalanmiller said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                    @bnrstnr said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                    @dashrender said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                    What do you mean skip server OSes? SA and RDS CALs in this case would only be applying to the desktop OS, not the server.

                    I meant it as deploying the W10 would be skipping the purchase of another server OS license

                    If you get some form of VDI icensing, you can skip server licensing. No server licensing is needed for VDI. Server licensing is just generally cheaper thatn VDI.

                    Now this I don't get.

                    A Window Server license is $800, that gives you two user's worth. SA for a machine in your environment (assuming you qualify) is $125 for 2 years per machine. And RDS license is like $50/user. It's going to take several years to climb over the $800 cost.

                    So what am I missing?

                    Of course, if you're user count is high, Datacenter licensing on Windows Sever will likely be the least expensive option.

                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                      last edited by

                      @dashrender said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                      @bnrstnr said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                      @dashrender said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                      What do you mean skip server OSes? SA and RDS CALs in this case would only be applying to the desktop OS, not the server.

                      I meant it as deploying the W10 would be skipping the purchase of another server license

                      Correct, you wouldn't need a Windows Server license if you are running your app inside Windows 10 VMs using SA RDS CALs.

                      Except no such thing exists, so obviously that isn't possible.

                      DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                        last edited by

                        @dashrender said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                        @scottalanmiller said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                        @bnrstnr said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                        @dashrender said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                        What do you mean skip server OSes? SA and RDS CALs in this case would only be applying to the desktop OS, not the server.

                        I meant it as deploying the W10 would be skipping the purchase of another server OS license

                        If you get some form of VDI icensing, you can skip server licensing. No server licensing is needed for VDI. Server licensing is just generally cheaper thatn VDI.

                        Now this I don't get.

                        A Window Server license is $800, that gives you two user's worth. SA for a machine in your environment (assuming you qualify) is $125 for 2 years per machine. And RDS license is like $50/user. It's going to take several years to climb over the $800 cost.

                        So what am I missing?

                        Of course, if you're user count is high, Datacenter licensing on Windows Sever will likely be the least expensive option.

                        Windows Server comes out to under $400/user for an OS generation.
                        SA comes out to $300/user every for years.

                        So that is if you are not doing RDS. That's VDI using Windows Server to alter the licensing scheme.

                        RDS requires only a single server, for all your users. So gets really cheap, really quickly.

                        DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          LEt's do four years.

                          VDI for 10 users: $2,500
                          RDS for 10 users: $800 for server, $500 for CALs... Total is $1,300

                          RDS is way cheper. Plus with the RDS way, you have another Windows server VM that you can use as you only consumed one of the two.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            Even if we lowered that to just five users...

                            VDI: $1,250
                            RDS: $1,050

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              And at four users:

                              VDI: $1,000
                              RDS: $1,000

                              That is your inflection point if you have to pay $800 for Windows Server. The cost is the same, but the RDS gives you more power, plus the space Server VM license to use.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • DashrenderD
                                Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                @scottalanmiller said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                                @dashrender said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                                @bnrstnr said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                                @dashrender said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                                What do you mean skip server OSes? SA and RDS CALs in this case would only be applying to the desktop OS, not the server.

                                I meant it as deploying the W10 would be skipping the purchase of another server license

                                Correct, you wouldn't need a Windows Server license if you are running your app inside Windows 10 VMs using SA, AND RDS CALs.

                                Except no such thing exists, so obviously that isn't possible.

                                whoops missed punctuation

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • DashrenderD
                                  Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  @scottalanmiller said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                                  @dashrender said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                                  @scottalanmiller said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                                  @bnrstnr said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                                  @dashrender said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                                  What do you mean skip server OSes? SA and RDS CALs in this case would only be applying to the desktop OS, not the server.

                                  I meant it as deploying the W10 would be skipping the purchase of another server OS license

                                  If you get some form of VDI icensing, you can skip server licensing. No server licensing is needed for VDI. Server licensing is just generally cheaper thatn VDI.

                                  Now this I don't get.

                                  A Window Server license is $800, that gives you two user's worth. SA for a machine in your environment (assuming you qualify) is $125 for 2 years per machine. And RDS license is like $50/user. It's going to take several years to climb over the $800 cost.

                                  So what am I missing?

                                  Of course, if you're user count is high, Datacenter licensing on Windows Sever will likely be the least expensive option.

                                  Windows Server comes out to under $400/user for an OS generation.
                                  SA comes out to $300/user every for years.

                                  So that is if you are not doing RDS. That's VDI using Windows Server to alter the licensing scheme.

                                  RDS requires only a single server, for all your users. So gets really cheap, really quickly.

                                  Where did RDS come into this? - OH I see - I meant the RDP license for remote access - but now I'm thinking you said that the RDP license is included with SA... so we can remove that from my price list.

                                  And you're right, RDS vs VDI, RDS is way cheaper.

                                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                                    last edited by

                                    @dashrender said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                                    @scottalanmiller said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                                    @dashrender said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                                    @scottalanmiller said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                                    @bnrstnr said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                                    @dashrender said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                                    What do you mean skip server OSes? SA and RDS CALs in this case would only be applying to the desktop OS, not the server.

                                    I meant it as deploying the W10 would be skipping the purchase of another server OS license

                                    If you get some form of VDI icensing, you can skip server licensing. No server licensing is needed for VDI. Server licensing is just generally cheaper thatn VDI.

                                    Now this I don't get.

                                    A Window Server license is $800, that gives you two user's worth. SA for a machine in your environment (assuming you qualify) is $125 for 2 years per machine. And RDS license is like $50/user. It's going to take several years to climb over the $800 cost.

                                    So what am I missing?

                                    Of course, if you're user count is high, Datacenter licensing on Windows Sever will likely be the least expensive option.

                                    Windows Server comes out to under $400/user for an OS generation.
                                    SA comes out to $300/user every for years.

                                    So that is if you are not doing RDS. That's VDI using Windows Server to alter the licensing scheme.

                                    RDS requires only a single server, for all your users. So gets really cheap, really quickly.

                                    Where did RDS come into this? - OH I see - I meant the RDP license for remote access - but now I'm thinking you said that the RDP license is included with SA... so we can remove that from my price list.

                                    And you're right, RDS vs VDI, RDS is way cheaper.

                                    RDP is a protocol and has no license.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      All of those VDI prices are sans infrasctructure, just doing ad hoc VMs without any golden image, no VDI management. None of hte stuff that people associate with VDI and feel make it cool. No VMware Horizons, no XenDesktop, just VM that you have to RDP into individually just as if they were individual desktops. Boring.

                                      To do anything interesting wit them, you need lots of expensive software that would throw the equations way off. The RDS approach includes the cool stuff to make it awesome in that price.

                                      For example, Microsoft's own VDI system leverages... RDS to do it. So you take all the cost of VDI plus all of the cost of RDS and merge them for Microsoft's "VDI solution" price.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • ObsolesceO
                                        Obsolesce @scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by

                                        @scottalanmiller said in MS Licensing - 3rd:

                                        Just search "Windows 7 vdi licensing" and the MS PDF is the first hit.

                                        So that's where they hide it... in the EULA of a separate product or whatever you want to call it.

                                        But yeah, it's pretty clear in there.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • 1
                                        • 2
                                        • 3
                                        • 4
                                        • 2 / 4
                                        • First post
                                          Last post