ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    RamBox

    IT Discussion
    4
    21
    2.1k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • AdamFA
      AdamF @scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      @scottalanmiller

      Yes, it will work in a browser, I just like the client better. Most things MS, I use in a browser, (Outlook mainly) but with Teams, I like the client. It's not a deal breaker, but rather a preference.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • JaredBuschJ
        JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        @scottalanmiller said in RamBox:

        @fuznutz04 said in RamBox:

        @JaredBusch After a bit more research, yep, it looks that way. I think if I wait just a bit longer, Teams and OnePassword will be available on Linux, and then I'll make the full switch.

        Does Teams not work in a browser? I've used it and was not even aware of there being a client. Isn't it just like Slack which is just a wrapper around the browser anyway when you install a client?

        The Slack client is not just a wrapper for the slack web interface.

        Just as Outlook is not a wrapper for OWA.

        Both may use the web protocols to get the content to display, but there are many other pieces around that content that are built into the client.

        No matter how much you try to claim OWA is great, it is not. Outlook is a much better interface for Exchange email. But like all better things, the cost is generally not worth it for most users because they do not need those extra features.

        scottalanmillerS AdamFA 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
          last edited by

          @JaredBusch said in RamBox:

          No matter how much you try to claim OWA is great, it is not. Outlook is a much better interface for Exchange email.

          And vice versa. I don't think OWA is great, I think Outlook is terrible. I just think OWA is slightly better.

          JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
            last edited by

            @JaredBusch said in RamBox:

            The Slack client is not just a wrapper for the slack web interface.

            Some of its clones are ACTUALLY wrappers.

            JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • JaredBuschJ
              JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              @scottalanmiller said in RamBox:

              @JaredBusch said in RamBox:

              No matter how much you try to claim OWA is great, it is not. Outlook is a much better interface for Exchange email.

              And vice versa. I don't think OWA is great, I think Outlook is terrible. I just think OWA is slightly better.

              Yes, but it is your opinion. Not a gospel truth.

              And circles back to the point here. Just because something like Teams is available in a web interface does not mean that it is the desired use.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                I never got the Slack app because I figured it was literally a wrapper. Downloading now.

                JaredBuschJ RomoR 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • JaredBuschJ
                  JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said in RamBox:

                  @JaredBusch said in RamBox:

                  The Slack client is not just a wrapper for the slack web interface.

                  Some of its clones are ACTUALLY wrappers.

                  You mean some alternate slack clients? Of course.

                  They are not clones. that would be theft. They are third party applications using API calls.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JaredBuschJ
                    JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    @scottalanmiller said in RamBox:

                    I never got the Slack app because I figured it was literally a wrapper. Downloading now.

                    The last time I used the Windows client it was noticeably different. But that was over a year ago. I have never been a big Slack user.

                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
                      last edited by

                      @JaredBusch said in RamBox:

                      @scottalanmiller said in RamBox:

                      I never got the Slack app because I figured it was literally a wrapper. Downloading now.

                      The last time I used the Windows client it was noticeably different. But that was over a year ago. I have never been a big Slack user.

                      Looks like a wrapper. It's pixel identical to the web page. No features or anything different from what I can tell.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        So if it used to not be a wrapper, maybe Slack is cloning Rocket.Chat now rather than the other way around.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • AdamFA
                          AdamF @JaredBusch
                          last edited by

                          @JaredBusch I use OWA because I switch back and forth between my Windows Desktop at my home office, and my Macbook while I am in the office, and traveling. While I could run Outlook on both the Windows box, and run Outlook on the Mac side, I think the Mac Outlook version sucks. So, I use OWA.

                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @AdamF
                            last edited by

                            @fuznutz04 said in RamBox:

                            @JaredBusch I use OWA because I switch back and forth between my Windows Desktop at my home office, and my Macbook while I am in the office, and traveling. While I could run Outlook on both the Windows box, and run Outlook on the Mac side, I think the Mac Outlook version sucks. So, I use OWA.

                            I find OWA more mobile as well, but Outlook does handle moving between devices pretty easily.

                            AdamFA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • AdamFA
                              AdamF @scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              @scottalanmiller said in RamBox:

                              @fuznutz04 said in RamBox:

                              @JaredBusch I use OWA because I switch back and forth between my Windows Desktop at my home office, and my Macbook while I am in the office, and traveling. While I could run Outlook on both the Windows box, and run Outlook on the Mac side, I think the Mac Outlook version sucks. So, I use OWA.

                              I find OWA more mobile as well, but Outlook does handle moving between devices pretty easily.

                              Yes, it does. On the Linux side, would you use a local mail client, or still stick with OWA?

                              If a native mail client, which one?

                              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller @AdamF
                                last edited by

                                @fuznutz04 said in RamBox:

                                @scottalanmiller said in RamBox:

                                @fuznutz04 said in RamBox:

                                @JaredBusch I use OWA because I switch back and forth between my Windows Desktop at my home office, and my Macbook while I am in the office, and traveling. While I could run Outlook on both the Windows box, and run Outlook on the Mac side, I think the Mac Outlook version sucks. So, I use OWA.

                                I find OWA more mobile as well, but Outlook does handle moving between devices pretty easily.

                                Yes, it does. On the Linux side, would you use a local mail client, or still stick with OWA?

                                If a native mail client, which one?

                                I use OWA. I tried Nylas, but something about my O365 account made it sluggish when it isn't with my other email. I don't use Exchange for my primary email, so OWA is fine. It's not Zimbra, that's kicking its butt in usability, but it is okay.

                                It's nice to have moved back to something better than Exchange. I forgot how much I preferred it.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • RomoR
                                  Romo @scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  @scottalanmiller said in RamBox:

                                  So if it used to not be a wrapper, maybe Slack is cloning Rocket.Chat now rather than the other way around.

                                  They both use Electron to provide their "desktop clients".

                                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller @Romo
                                    last edited by

                                    @Romo said in RamBox:

                                    @scottalanmiller said in RamBox:

                                    So if it used to not be a wrapper, maybe Slack is cloning Rocket.Chat now rather than the other way around.

                                    They both use Electron to provide their "desktop clients".

                                    I knew that Rocket did. So Slack copied that from them?

                                    RomoR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • RomoR
                                      Romo @scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      @scottalanmiller said in RamBox:

                                      @Romo said in RamBox:

                                      @scottalanmiller said in RamBox:

                                      So if it used to not be a wrapper, maybe Slack is cloning Rocket.Chat now rather than the other way around.

                                      They both use Electron to provide their "desktop clients".

                                      I knew that Rocket did. So Slack copied that from them?

                                      Don't really know, I know they were using Electron for the windows app almost since the beginning and just last year change the mac version from MacGap to Electron as well.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • 1
                                      • 2
                                      • 2 / 2
                                      • First post
                                        Last post