ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Clarifying Symbolic Links

    IT Discussion
    5
    25
    1.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • wirestyle22W
      wirestyle22 @scottalanmiller
      last edited by wirestyle22

      @scottalanmiller said in Clarifying Symbolic Links:

      So let's use the config use case. Let's say that there are ten stock configuration files for an application. When run, you have to supply the application with a configuration in order for it to run. You have one hundred users. You might make a symbolic link named ian that points to userdefault6.conf as that's the configuration file you want. The files for betty and monica point to that one, too. But joe, bernard, rebecca and johnstamos all point to userdefault4.conf.

      Alright, that makes perfect sense. Thank you.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @wirestyle22
        last edited by

        @wirestyle22 said in Clarifying Symbolic Links:

        @scottalanmiller said in Clarifying Symbolic Links:

        @wirestyle22 said in Clarifying Symbolic Links:

        I understand what you're saying, I'm speaking totally in regards to the configuration of a piece of software, not accessing a program.

        Why pick that one use case?

        I'm trying to understand the use case: Windows vs. Linux. It makes more sense to me to use a shortcut in a GUI, but what is the use case for the CLI?

        Exactly the same.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • mlnewsM
          mlnews
          last edited by

          Perfect timing, this came up in the news thread this morning...

          The Beauty of Links

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
          • stacksofplatesS
            stacksofplates
            last edited by

            Another thought, you will save yourself headaches if you use a full path for the original file. If you just link ian to file1 and later move Ian, it will break. But if you reference the full path for file1, it will work no matter where you move ian.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • stacksofplatesS
              stacksofplates @wirestyle22
              last edited by

              @wirestyle22 said in Clarifying Symbolic Links:

              @scottalanmiller said in Clarifying Symbolic Links:

              @wirestyle22 said in Clarifying Symbolic Links:

              I understand what you're saying, I'm speaking totally in regards to the configuration of a piece of software, not accessing a program.

              Why pick that one use case?

              I'm trying to understand the use case: Windows vs. Linux. It makes more sense to me to use a shortcut in a GUI, but what is the use case for the CLI?

              Here is a real world example. The corporate IT guys are using something called Useful. It displays images through a zero client attached to a TV. We mounted a share to the server and made a soft link to the directory in the share. Useful looks at the soft link for images and sees whatever is in the share.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • 1
              • 2
              • 2 / 2
              • First post
                Last post