ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    How Complete is XenServer Really

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    69 Posts 14 Posters 6.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller @FATeknollogee
      last edited by

      @FATeknollogee said in How Complete is XenServer Really:

      Everyone says yes boot off USB, yet it takes a massive thread to figure out logging!
      Should things like that this not be baked in from the get go?

      So of my three competitors let's compare:

      • KVM by Default: No
      • ESXi by Default: Yes
      • Hyper-V by Default: No
      • XenServer by Default: No

      So if the question is "should it", maybe. It's something I would like to see for sure. If the question is "is XS behind its competitors" the answer for that one issue is clearly "no, it is not behind." USB booting with no additional configuration is an ESXi unique feature.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • olivierO
        olivier @DustinB3403
        last edited by

        @DustinB3403 Don't forget to tell there is a commercial solution for companies wanting to have a turnkey+update+support with it 😉

        DustinB3403D scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • DustinB3403D
          DustinB3403 @olivier
          last edited by

          @olivier said in How Complete is XenServer Really:

          @DustinB3403 Don't forget to tell there is a commercial solution for companies wanting to have a turnkey+update+support with it 😉

          I always do, I don't want you giving up!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • BRRABillB
            BRRABill @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller said

            So blame me for that, not XS.

            Oh I blame you, don't worry. 😉

            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @olivier
              last edited by

              @olivier said in How Complete is XenServer Really:

              @DustinB3403 Don't forget to tell there is a commercial solution for companies wanting to have a turnkey+update+support with it 😉

              Of course!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • FATeknollogeeF
                FATeknollogee
                last edited by

                Don't get me wrong, I really like XS...
                As a HyperV guy, if HyperV was setup like XS (instead of needing all the the domain BS just to connect) it would be much more successful, my 2 cents

                coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @BRRABill
                  last edited by

                  @BRRABill said in How Complete is XenServer Really:

                  @scottalanmiller said

                  So blame me for that, not XS.

                  Oh I blame you, don't worry. 😉

                  That's good.

                  BRRABillB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • coliverC
                    coliver @FATeknollogee
                    last edited by

                    @FATeknollogee said in How Complete is XenServer Really:

                    Don't get me wrong, I really like XS...
                    As a HyperV guy, if HyperV was setup like XS (instead of needing all the the domain BS just to connect) it would be much more successful, my 2 cents

                    Wait... what? You don't need to be connected to a domain to use Hyper-V? Where did you get that idea from?

                    FATeknollogeeF 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
                    • BRRABillB
                      BRRABill @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller said in How Complete is XenServer Really:

                      @BRRABill said in How Complete is XenServer Really:

                      @scottalanmiller said

                      So blame me for that, not XS.

                      Oh I blame you, don't worry. 😉

                      That's good.

                      LOL.

                      All good. It was a learning process.

                      I have the ability to learn new stuff where I work.

                      I'm still not 100% sure what I would do. Now that it's working, it's fine. Not a blip in sight thus far.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • FATeknollogeeF
                        FATeknollogee @coliver
                        last edited by

                        @coliver Let me re-phrase that.
                        You need a domain to take full advantage of the Hyper-V stack (is that better?)

                        scottalanmillerS coliverC 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @FATeknollogee
                          last edited by

                          @FATeknollogee said in How Complete is XenServer Really:

                          @coliver Let me re-phrase that.
                          You need a domain to take full advantage of the Hyper-V stack (is that better?)

                          What features come from domain connectivity?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • coliverC
                            coliver @FATeknollogee
                            last edited by

                            @FATeknollogee said in How Complete is XenServer Really:

                            @coliver Let me re-phrase that.
                            You need a domain to take full advantage of the Hyper-V stack (is that better?)

                            Which features? Everything I'm aware of can be done without a domain.

                            JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • FATeknollogeeF
                              FATeknollogee @coliver
                              last edited by

                              @coliver said in How Complete is XenServer Really:

                              @FATeknollogee said in How Complete is XenServer Really:

                              Don't get me wrong, I really like XS...
                              As a HyperV guy, if HyperV was setup like XS (instead of needing all the the domain BS just to connect) it would be much more successful, my 2 cents

                              Wait... what? You don't need to be connected to a domain to use Hyper-V? Where did you get that idea from?

                              Why can't you just install Hyper-V & connect with a browser like ESXi or XO?

                              coliverC scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • coliverC
                                coliver @FATeknollogee
                                last edited by coliver

                                @FATeknollogee said in How Complete is XenServer Really:

                                @coliver said in How Complete is XenServer Really:

                                @FATeknollogee said in How Complete is XenServer Really:

                                Don't get me wrong, I really like XS...
                                As a HyperV guy, if HyperV was setup like XS (instead of needing all the the domain BS just to connect) it would be much more successful, my 2 cents

                                Wait... what? You don't need to be connected to a domain to use Hyper-V? Where did you get that idea from?

                                Why can't you just install Hyper-V & connect with a browser like ESXi or XO?

                                What does this have to do with a domain? Even when connected to a domain you'd need Hyper-V Manager to do any management. This was a design decision, that was the wrong choice in my opinion, but has really nothing to do with functionality.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @FATeknollogee
                                  last edited by

                                  @FATeknollogee said in How Complete is XenServer Really:

                                  @coliver said in How Complete is XenServer Really:

                                  @FATeknollogee said in How Complete is XenServer Really:

                                  Don't get me wrong, I really like XS...
                                  As a HyperV guy, if HyperV was setup like XS (instead of needing all the the domain BS just to connect) it would be much more successful, my 2 cents

                                  Wait... what? You don't need to be connected to a domain to use Hyper-V? Where did you get that idea from?

                                  Why can't you just install Hyper-V & connect with a browser like ESXi or XO?

                                  Because Hyper-V is lacking and needs commercial third party tools to get to that point. That's a big deficiency in the system.

                                  XS has that too, but XO provides it and for free. So that's why XS+XO as a bundle is what we often refer to.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • Reid CooperR
                                    Reid Cooper
                                    last edited by

                                    XS may not be complete, but isn't it the "most complete" of all options available?

                                    DustinB3403D DashrenderD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • DustinB3403D
                                      DustinB3403 @Reid Cooper
                                      last edited by

                                      @Reid-Cooper said in How Complete is XenServer Really:

                                      XS may not be complete, but isn't it the "most complete" of all options available?

                                      With XO it certainly is a very complete solution.

                                      Without XO, we would be using unitrends (or hyper-v and some backup appliance)

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • JaredBuschJ
                                        JaredBusch @coliver
                                        last edited by

                                        @coliver said in How Complete is XenServer Really:

                                        @FATeknollogee said in How Complete is XenServer Really:

                                        @coliver Let me re-phrase that.
                                        You need a domain to take full advantage of the Hyper-V stack (is that better?)

                                        Which features? Everything I'm aware of can be done without a domain.

                                        Nothing, but I assume he means without a domain setup, remote connectivity is a pain in the ass to set up.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • DashrenderD
                                          Dashrender @Reid Cooper
                                          last edited by

                                          @Reid-Cooper said in How Complete is XenServer Really:

                                          XS may not be complete, but isn't it the "most complete" of all options available?

                                          what does that mean? most complete?

                                          Reid CooperR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • DashrenderD
                                            Dashrender
                                            last edited by

                                            I agree with the OP - Dustin's SR problem wasn't solved by going to a USB stick based install. Did it ultimately make it easier, perhaps a little, but the install was still not easy.

                                            But, at the same time I don't know that ESXi or Hyper-V would be any easier.
                                            Can anyone speak to installing ESXi or Hyper-V to local OBR-10 5 TB or larger and having access to the remaining storage for VMs upon completion of installation?
                                            With any luck, XS v7 has fixed this.

                                            But back to the OP's point. XS does seem to expect one to know a lot of linux based commands and lookup many xe commands to do things that are completely possible to be done within the GUI in ESXi and Hyper-V.
                                            For example, importing a SR(datastore). In XS you must use the command line for this. In ESXi, this can be accomplished completely in the vSphere GUI.
                                            And speaking about importing a SR - ESXi will see and import the VMs from the SR automatically, recreating all of the VMs on that SR (it does ask first though). in XS you have to have previously backed up the metadata, then restore it. The restore might be along the same lines ESXi, but the backup process? That doesn't exist in ESXi.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 2 / 4
                                            • First post
                                              Last post