ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Licensing query...

    IT Discussion
    7
    24
    2.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • JoelJ
      Joel
      last edited by

      Hi Guys

      Following my convo above about the terminal/rds server setup. I now have this working well so thankyou for helping with that.

      As a recap, I have a virtual DC (DC01) to manage our users/groups and a virtual App server (APP01) running with Excel installed which is published as a remote app. Our end users use Pertino to access and run the remote Excel and are authenticated via the DC. I think this works well and keeps the setup more 'internal' and not published over the web which is better for security.

      I am currently using the 100 day free licenses for RDS, however my question is when that runs out, should I purchase Device CALS or User CALS?
      We have so far 15 users logging in and they pretty much use their own laptops to access the APP01.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • hobbit666H
        hobbit666
        last edited by

        Device CALS are cheaper 🙂
        Think last quote I had (before all the price hike due to brexit)

        £100 User cal, £77 device cal

        JoelJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • JoelJ
          Joel @hobbit666
          last edited by

          @hobbit666 stupid question (my licensing knowledge is of a newb), should i choose device CAL, would i just need to license the 1 app01 server for 15users to access it? As opposed to licensing 15user CALs to use the app01 server?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • hobbit666H
            hobbit666
            last edited by

            If I remember your database server is a RDS server too?
            In that case you are going to need Server CAL's (Device or User) and RDS CAL's.

            Which one to choose depends on future plans. If at the moment you have 1 : 1 ration of computers and users then I would go cheaper device CALs BUT! if you think people will start accessing from different devices like tablets/laptops/phones etc then User CAL's make more sense.

            JoelJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DustinB3403D
              DustinB3403
              last edited by

              Device call are cheaper but I thought they were assigned to specific devices.

              Where as user CALS were transferable...

              Am I wrong?

              DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DashrenderD
                Dashrender @DustinB3403
                last edited by

                @DustinB3403 said in Licensing query...:

                Device call are cheaper but I thought they were assigned to specific devices.

                Where as user CALS were transferable...

                Am I wrong?

                Device Cal's are transferable also every 90 days

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DashrenderD
                  Dashrender
                  last edited by

                  Only if the same devices will realisticly be used would I consider device CALs.

                  User CALs are a lot more flexible.

                  Device CALs also make sense for shift workers. You only have 30 devices bit they are shared by 90 people.

                  JoelJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • JoelJ
                    Joel @hobbit666
                    last edited by

                    @hobbit666 said in Licensing query...:

                    If I remember your database server is a RDS server too?
                    In that case you are going to need Server CAL's (Device or User) and RDS CAL's.

                    Which one to choose depends on future plans. If at the moment you have 1 : 1 ration of computers and users then I would go cheaper device CALs BUT! if you think people will start accessing from different devices like tablets/laptops/phones etc then User CAL's make more sense.

                    Yes, the database is a RDS server so we will indeed need RDS Cals. I assume also this is 1x RDS CAL per user?
                    User cals probably makes sense as some have two laptops and an office computer.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • JoelJ
                      Joel @Dashrender
                      last edited by

                      @Dashrender said in Licensing query...:

                      Only if the same devices will realisticly be used would I consider device CALs.

                      User CALs are a lot more flexible.

                      Device CALs also make sense for shift workers. You only have 30 devices bit they are shared by 90 people.

                      If all users are logging into the same RDS server than do I simply need RDS CALs (for each user) and a single Device CALS for the server?

                      DashrenderD scottalanmillerS thwrT 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DashrenderD
                        Dashrender @Joel
                        last edited by

                        @Joel said in Licensing query...:

                        @Dashrender said in Licensing query...:

                        Only if the same devices will realisticly be used would I consider device CALs.

                        User CALs are a lot more flexible.

                        Device CALs also make sense for shift workers. You only have 30 devices bit they are shared by 90 people.

                        If all users are logging into the same RDS server than do I simply need RDS CALs (for each user) and a single Device CALS for the server?

                        There are two types of CALs. Windows server CALs, which come in two flavors (user or device). And RDS CALs which also has user or device.

                        In your situation you would need to buy one of each kind per user.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @Joel
                          last edited by

                          @Joel said in Licensing query...:

                          @Dashrender said in Licensing query...:

                          Only if the same devices will realisticly be used would I consider device CALs.

                          User CALs are a lot more flexible.

                          Device CALs also make sense for shift workers. You only have 30 devices bit they are shared by 90 people.

                          If all users are logging into the same RDS server than do I simply need RDS CALs (for each user) and a single Device CALS for the server?

                          Servers don't use device CALs.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • thwrT
                            thwr @Joel
                            last edited by

                            @Joel said in Licensing query...:

                            @Dashrender said in Licensing query...:

                            Only if the same devices will realisticly be used would I consider device CALs.

                            User CALs are a lot more flexible.

                            Device CALs also make sense for shift workers. You only have 30 devices bit they are shared by 90 people.

                            If all users are logging into the same RDS server than do I simply need RDS CALs (for each user) and a single Device CALS for the server?

                            It's a one time either-or deciscion. Either User CALs or Device CALs. Call centers will probably use Dev CALs (Many users, few devices) while most other companies with more devices than users will use User CALs. You can't mix them whatsoever.

                            You not only need CALs for the servers (-> operating system), but also for many MS products. For example MS Project Server or SharePoint. You need to buy these CALs too.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • hobbit666H
                              hobbit666
                              last edited by

                              You may want to talk to someone at a reseller like Misco or Softcat that's a specialist as Microsoft licensing can be tricky.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • 1
                              • 2
                              • 2 / 2
                              • First post
                                Last post