@dafyre said in Kooler on DFS-R Issues:

With Starwind's coming Linux release (or has it already been released?)... Would this not be done in a Linux VM? That would eliminate concerns about licensing and such.

StarWind Linux VSA is released

There's no problem to install anything like us into parent partition, question was is it OK to use it as a file server with a free version of Windows

@dafyre said in Linux RAID Question - Software or "Hardware" ?:

@anthonyh said in Linux RAID Question - Software or "Hardware" ?:

@anthonyh said in Linux RAID Question - Software or "Hardware" ?:

@dafyre said in Linux RAID Question - Software or "Hardware" ?:

@marcinozga said in Linux RAID Question - Software or "Hardware" ?:

My money is on fake RAID you got there. So use md.

@marcinozga said in Linux RAID Question - Software or "Hardware" ?:

My money is on fake RAID you got there. So use md.

Also because you already use MD. 🙂

You know what, I can even move the two disks to my new workstation and not have to transfer any data.

I think the answer may have been found... 😄

Actually even better, I can break the RAID 1 on my current box and convert it to non-RAID, then move one of the disks to my new workstation and convert it back to RAID 1. If done right, I think I can do it all without any data loss too.

I'd prefer to just move the two disks and not have to transfer any data... but that's just me.

Yeah. I'll need to copy my home directory to the SSD in my current box before doing that though. That might be easier than breaking/re-creating the RAID. I'm not quite ready to "switch" yet. Hmm...

@Breffni-Potter said in HPE SANs Not Designed for Reliability in the Australian Tax Office:

Listening to any vendor consulting will lead to a p*** poor system but for the vendors profit.

Yeah, they brought in the wrong people here. Fundamental business flaws. Listening to the sales people instead of hiring someone whose job it is to know what is needed.

This won't be an overnight fix. My first step though is complete. The Synology is now in RAID 10 with 1 hot spare disk. One thing to note; the disks in this Synology are WD reds :(. So even though the storage connects to the Hyper-V host via iSCSI, the VHDX stored on it, which contains the data for our file server is at least not living on a RAID 5 anymore.

Next will be dealing with the local storage situation on the Hyper-V host (the two-drive RAID 1 and the three-drive RAID 5). The only "production" VM storage left on the RAID 5 is our Spiceworks VM, which I'll move to the RAID 1 storage. The other VMs that have their VHDs on the RAID 5 are non-production / testing VMs, so if they're lost, it's not a big deal to just rebuild them.

@JaredBusch said in Hardware Design for SAM-DR Small Rackmount Backup Device:

@matteo-nunziati said in Hardware Design for SAM-DR Small Rackmount Backup Device:

@scottalanmiller just a question (sw not hw) why veeam rather than say.. altaro. Just curious!

There is no backup software on this device. It is a storage target. One assumes that @scottalanmiller will be using some base OS that lets you setup basically any type of connectivity.

Ok! Got it wrong! Thanks for clarifying

That will be amazing. Looking forward to that for sure.

@scottalanmiller said in Disk expansion - CentOS:

Can't wait to move to it in production.

I know. I didn't even bother installing it yet for testing. I'll wait for RC 2 for that. 🙂

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/04/28/optane_in_pcs_is_as_good_as_it_will_get_for_years_says_analyst/

As long as you don't delete all my datas because my online account has issues!

So much development on many fronts, great job guys.

And another +1 To backup storage. That's actually what ~70-80% of our customers do with their SANs when swtiching to StarWind HCA or even VSAN.
Another interesting approach which I see less often is to use 2 existing SAN boxes as a storage capacity addition to the new HCI, with some of that storage actually mirrored between the SANs through the HCI storage virtualization layer. This is where customers can actually keep both backup and testing workloads without breaking the SANs into islands of resources.

@scottalanmiller said in FreeNAS Gets Hit by the Jurassic Park Effect:

HCL

Yes, agreed!

That's what I get for posting before I'm totally awake. This is what I get when I run the command on my group:

BackupTarget> show member Name Status Version Disks Capacity FreeSpace Connections ---------- ------- ---------- ----- ---------- ---------- ----------- 16TB online V7.0.7 (R3 16 11.34TB 6.72TB 2 97085) syr-8TB online V7.1.2 (R4 16 5.66TB 3.69TB 3 02088) 4TB online V7.0.7 (R3 16 2.83TB 1.84TB 2 97085) BackupTarget>

I think the command is showing the free space on the volumes after creation, not before since I think I have mine fully provisioned.

Just type:
show
and it will scroll through all the things under the show command and you should be able to figure out the size of your member. This is just the first of like 4 pages:

BackupTarget> show ______________________________ Group Information ______________________________ Name: BackupTarget Group-Ipaddress: 192.168.100.21 DateAndTime: Thu Apr 20 03:32:04 2017 TimeZone: America/New_York TotalVolumes: 3 VolumesOnline: 3 VolumesInUse: 3 TotalSnapshots: 0 SnapshotsOnline: 0 SnapshotsInUse: 0 TotalMembers: 3 MembersOnline: 3 MembersInUse: 3 TotalCapacity: 19.83TB VolumeReserve: 7.58TB VolumeReportedSpace: 7.58TB SnapReservedSpace: 3GB SnapReservedSpaceInUse: 0MB ReplicationReservedSpace: 0MB FailbackReservedSpace: 0MB DelegatedSpace: 0MB DelegatedSpaceInUse: 0MB FreeSpace: 12.24TB TotalDisks: 48 OnlineDisks: 45 SpareDisks: 3 OfflineDisks: 0 FailedDisks: 0 Collections: 0 Snapcols: 0 CustomSnapcols: 0 ThinProvFreeSpace: 122.49TB TotalSpaceBorrowing: 0MB Connections: 7 _______________________________________________________________________________

@msff-amman-Itofficer said in FreeNAS 10 Has Been Recalled:

@scottalanmiller

True, adding the whole virtualization aspect and container support might caused this. I genuine when testing it out didnt like the new theme or steering me away from being storage server into something else.

I agree, I think that FreeNAS feels like it is drifting now. Is it storage, is it a hypervisor? Any BHyve for normal users, really? The new interface looked cool, but failed to even run when I tested it. They are a tiny company with few resource trying to do way too much. The old FreeNAS product was bad enough, I know loads of places loses data or access to data either because FreeNAS itself was glitchy or because it failed the "front loaded engineering" design principle and left customers in a tight position leading to failure.

I saw something about this the other day... It is interesting to say the least.