@JaredBusch said:
There are many, many people int he IT community that vocally believe that open source is simply more secure because it is open source and that is simply not true.
As far as "all things being equal" is possible, I believe that this is true. The problem is is that most people then take that statement and use it to mean that "all" open source code is safer than "all" closed code even of two different projects which is completely senseless and has nothing to do with the situation.
It is if you took the same people and the same project and the same attempt over and over again one open and one closed that the open would win.
When choosing a process, you choose open for security.
