You should never over lap channels that causes co-channel interference. If you have to then as stated above the AP's that are farthest physically apart should use the same channel.
Also, I would turn off 2.4GHz unless you NEED IT and even then you probably don't NEED IT on all 4 AP's. Try just on 2 AP's to reduce interference and see what happens. Many cases in our offices I have either completely turned off 2.4 or I have it on only 1 AP and absolutely no complaints about wifi since I did that.

For some reason, it would not downgrade like normal within chocolatey

So I did an uninstall, reinstall of version 1.4.6, then pinned version 1.4.6 so it will not upgrade when the daily task fires that uprgades all packages.

choco uninstall zerotier-one -y choco install zerotier-one --version=1.4.6 -y choco pin add -n=zerotier-one

Of course I did it all via ScreenConnect.

711f661b-2f41-4bd0-a83b-a297a2d09376-image.png
58f00374-e5c1-4d6f-8de9-f88b95a662d8-image.png

This is what a pin does:
2a64dc4a-d595-4f68-ac76-2faa3f55d77b-image.png

Youtube Video

@stacksofplates said in Kvm network troubleshooting:

@scottalanmiller said in Kvm network troubleshooting:

Your server has an IP address of 192.168.122.1? Is that correct? Nothing wrong with that technically, but it would be exceptionally unusual. That's almost always the gateway address. What is the address of your gateway?

That's libvirts virtual bridge address for the NAT network.

Oh, duh, I missed the bridge. Carry on. 🙂

@scottalanmiller said in [Solved] All computers cannot access 1 specific site:

@manxam Well that worked out then 🙂

I did. We're not ones for forcing tech on clients but there's a limit to client risks that we're willing to live with.
This particular client deals with a LOT of sensitive data and it always bothered me that they had a known vulnerable router in place that we had to admin with a 5 year old version of Firefox.

@maximus said in How to use "the Dude" network monitoring?:

Happy New Year Sir.

And to you as well.

@jblaze said in Latency with VDI in VMware View 7 environment:

I'm new to VDIs so not entirely sure if I'm asking the right questions. The server is hosted externally by our MSP and they're trying to determine what the cause is.

That it is external alone is almost certainly the problem. VDI can work remotely, but is often relatively painful. Also, be aware, while there is some extreme edge cases where you can do hosted VDI, this has traditionally not been allowed and unless your MSP has figured out some extremely new and rare licensing with Microsoft, those VDIs aren't legal.

I've always used WiFi Analyizer on a phone/tablet if I needed to survey a location. That said, a thread on linuxquestions.com led me to: https://alternativeto.net/software/inssider/?platform=linux#. Looks like some options at least, don't really know if they're decent.

@emad-r said in Linux NiC Bond Question:

Hi,

after you create linux nic bonding, do you disable the original nic adapters, so only the bond network adapter gets IP and has priority.

Cause the only way I saw activity of my nm-bond interface was when I disabled the ens33 and ens34 from getting an IP, so only the bond has it.

Or you keep all interfaces as is with the machine having 3 IPs, how then it will determine to use the bond IP and not others?

I used rr or round robin

I use only use the virtual NICs as well on Debian as well.

@dbeato said in Patch Tuesday - Intel Network Drivers:

@ccwtech said in Patch Tuesday - Intel Network Drivers:

Apparently Ninja doesn't control that, so it must have been Windows update defaults.

Wow, check it and see if you can apply a GPO to not allow for that.

As soon as the fire is out... I'll have to take a look.

@brandon220 said in Network in industrial environments:

I installed a few of the wall racks with filters on the bottom and fans on top for exhaust like the ones Jared mentioned. Don't remember the brand or price. The equipment stayed very clean and cool. Hard part is remembering to change/clean the filters regularly depending on the environment.

That is what calendar events are for.

@tdantzler said in Yet another UBNT EdgeMax vs Unifi:

@JaredBusch I'm looking at the AirMAX lineup and have used a few of the products like the NanoStation 5AC loco with fabulous results.. but the rest of the stuff looks a little more than consumer grade. Do you think this is an accurate breakdown -

Unifi - Small to Medium business with low customization needs. Primarily for Access Layer and down. Nice interface but not standard for routing setup

UniFi routers and switches, yes. UniFi Access Points, are solid for any purpose.

Also, I would personally never use UniFi routing/switching in SMB. But I know some people just live that pretty pane of glass that they never look at after 3 weeks.

@storageninja said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

@dbeato said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

The only thing I would not run over wifi is VoIP phones, not because of security but stability on the network.

I've been doing this all week (and I'm in India) without issues....

Yes, I know we have discussed this.

Isn't that what they say in Texas...the more bigger, the more better...(sarcasm emoji)