ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Firewall Configuration in Linux in Centos 6.2

    IT Discussion
    centos iptables linux unix netstat centos 6
    7
    81
    19.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • StrongBadS
      StrongBad
      last edited by

      There you go, SAM provided a complete configuration. If you apply that, it will completely overwrite anything that you have already. If you want to have us help you keep the server working as it does now but also do what you want, you have to work with us and not ask for block diagrams or other unrelated items. Only your IPTables listing matters. I have no idea what you are imagining that you will accomplish with diagrams, but they don't have a place here.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • LakshmanaL
        Lakshmana @thanksajdotcom
        last edited by

        @thanksajdotcom Sorry dont get angry.The server is web server.SMTP,SNMP,POP3,IMAP needs tp be open

        scottalanmillerS thanksajdotcomT 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @Lakshmana
          last edited by

          @Lakshmana said:

          @thanksajdotcom Sorry dont get angry.The server is web server.SMTP,SNMP,POP3,IMAP needs tp be open

          Whoa, that's very different than what you asked for. If you follow my directions you will blow away your ports and lose all of those services!!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • LakshmanaL
            Lakshmana @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller Thank you Scott.I will try this tommorrow and say about this in detail.Do you have explanation for the above mentioned commands because I understood in less

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              This is why it is important to listen. @strongbad asked you for a copy of your existing configuration so that we could help you. Lacking that, providing what you asked for was the next best thing. But what you asked for would have completely broken the server.

              Everyone is trying to help you. When they say that providing your existing IPTables file is necessary for us to help, they are not kidding. It's imperative. Anything else is very dangerous. IPTables is not hard to do, but it is very hard to do blindly.

              LakshmanaL 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • thanksajdotcomT
                thanksajdotcom @Lakshmana
                last edited by

                @Lakshmana said:

                @thanksajdotcom Sorry dont get angry.The server is web server.SMTP,SNMP,POP3,IMAP needs tp be open

                Ok, I'm not angry, but I'm frustrated. What you just gave us was useful. However, we asked several times for the info and you kept not giving it to us. If it's a language barrier, I'm sorry but I was being as simple and plain as possible.

                SNMP = 161
                SMTP = 25 (unsecured), 465 (secured), 587 (secured)
                POP3, = 110 (unsecured), 995 (secured)
                IMAP = 143 (unsecured), 993 (secured)

                Unless you've blocked them in IPTables already, they should be open.

                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  CentOS does have a tool for adding ports, but other than pointing you to the tool, it doesn't really let us help you. It's not terribly hard to use, but doing an IPTables edit allows us to completely make the change for you. One of the beauties of text configuration files is that we can completely do the fix, not just tell you where to look.

                  But if you want to try the TUI, here is the link...

                  system-config-firewall-tui
                  
                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • LakshmanaL
                    Lakshmana @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    @scottalanmiller Ok Scott.I have not noted the things properly so only the confusion came here.Sorry to one and all

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @thanksajdotcom
                      last edited by

                      @thanksajdotcom said:

                      @Lakshmana said:

                      @thanksajdotcom Sorry dont get angry.The server is web server.SMTP,SNMP,POP3,IMAP needs tp be open

                      Ok, I'm not angry, but I'm frustrated. What you just gave us was useful. However, we asked several times for the info and you kept not giving it to us. If it's a language barrier, I'm sorry but I was being as simple and plain as possible.

                      SNMP = 161
                      SMTP = 25 (unsecured), 465 (secured), 587 (secured)
                      POP3, = 110 (unsecured), 995 (secured)
                      IMAP = 143 (unsecured), 993 (secured)

                      Unless you've blocked them in IPTables already, they should be open.

                      They are all blocked by default. Only SSH and ICMP are open by default on CentOS. RHEL / CentOS is secure by default.

                      thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • thanksajdotcomT
                        thanksajdotcom
                        last edited by

                        If you're SSHing into the box, run

                        cat /etc/sysconfig/iptables
                        

                        Highlight the output in whatever client you're using to SSH, likely PuTTY, and paste it here. Please. We can't help you without that info.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          Here is the only thing that I could find for a firewall block diagram. Definitely not useful for anyone working with firewalls.

                          http://creately.com/diagram/example/hb7hjlii3/firewall

                          LakshmanaL 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • thanksajdotcomT
                            thanksajdotcom @scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            @scottalanmiller said:

                            @thanksajdotcom said:

                            @Lakshmana said:

                            @thanksajdotcom Sorry dont get angry.The server is web server.SMTP,SNMP,POP3,IMAP needs tp be open

                            Ok, I'm not angry, but I'm frustrated. What you just gave us was useful. However, we asked several times for the info and you kept not giving it to us. If it's a language barrier, I'm sorry but I was being as simple and plain as possible.

                            SNMP = 161
                            SMTP = 25 (unsecured), 465 (secured), 587 (secured)
                            POP3, = 110 (unsecured), 995 (secured)
                            IMAP = 143 (unsecured), 993 (secured)

                            Unless you've blocked them in IPTables already, they should be open.

                            They are all blocked by default. Only SSH and ICMP are open by default on CentOS. RHEL / CentOS is secure by default.

                            Ok, my mistake. Well, those are the ports. Given the info, I'd doubt they are using TLS or SSL, so probably 25 and 143. No reason to use POP3. Avoid it like the plague.

                            LakshmanaL 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • LakshmanaL
                              Lakshmana @thanksajdotcom
                              last edited by

                              @thanksajdotcom OK AJ.Thank u.I will configure the things tommorow at my office,

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • ?
                                A Former User
                                last edited by

                                Keep in mind order of the rules matters. a Reject before a Accept may render the Accept useless. However in some cases a reject before a accept can be needed.

                                thanksajdotcomT scottalanmillerS LakshmanaL 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • thanksajdotcomT
                                  thanksajdotcom @A Former User
                                  last edited by

                                  @thecreativeone91 said:

                                  Keep in mind order of the rules matters. a Reject before a Accept may render the Accept useless. However in some cases a reject before a accept can be needed.

                                  Ditto this.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller @A Former User
                                    last edited by

                                    @thecreativeone91 said:

                                    Keep in mind order of the rules matters. a Reject before a Accept may render the Accept useless. However in some cases a reject before a accept can be needed.

                                    Yes, don't edit the IPTables file without us. Just provide it and let us edit it for you.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • LakshmanaL
                                      Lakshmana @A Former User
                                      last edited by

                                      @thecreativeone91 said:

                                      ject before a Accept may render the Accept useless. However in some cases a reject before a accept can be needed.

                                      Ok If I have any i will contact you

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • LakshmanaL
                                        Lakshmana @scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by

                                        @scottalanmiller Whether a firewall can have IP address of Gateway.Whether it is possible to have?

                                        ? scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • ?
                                          A Former User @Lakshmana
                                          last edited by

                                          @Lakshmana said:

                                          @scottalanmiller Whether a firewall can have IP address of Gateway.Whether it is possible to have?

                                          What are you asking? I'm not sure.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • scottalanmillerS
                                            scottalanmiller @Lakshmana
                                            last edited by

                                            @Lakshmana said:

                                            @scottalanmiller Whether a firewall can have IP address of Gateway.Whether it is possible to have?

                                            No, firewalls are like filters. They have no concept of gateways or routes.

                                            LakshmanaL 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 3 / 5
                                            • First post
                                              Last post