Is Open Source Really So Much More Secure By Nature
-
@Dashrender said in Is Open Source Really So Much More Secure By Nature:
@DustinB3403 said in Is Open Source Really So Much More Secure By Nature:
@scottalanmiller said in Is Open Source Really So Much More Secure By Nature:
An entire risk that exists only for closed source.
I hope on of the products is Microsoft Teams so they can fix the glaring functional issues with it...
Is Teams really a product though? I think of it more as a service... I mean I know they have clients for desktop and mobile... but the web version definitely feels more like a service.
I did a 2-day conference over Teams last week. It actually went very well.
-
@Obsolesce said in Is Open Source Really So Much More Secure By Nature:
@Dashrender said in Is Open Source Really So Much More Secure By Nature:
@DustinB3403 said in Is Open Source Really So Much More Secure By Nature:
@scottalanmiller said in Is Open Source Really So Much More Secure By Nature:
An entire risk that exists only for closed source.
I hope on of the products is Microsoft Teams so they can fix the glaring functional issues with it...
Is Teams really a product though? I think of it more as a service... I mean I know they have clients for desktop and mobile... but the web version definitely feels more like a service.
I did a 2-day conference over Teams last week. It actually went very well.
It has improved a lot. It's still trails other solutions, but what from MS doesn't. It's at least starting to catch up with the level of behind that most of the rest of the MS ecosystem is.