ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Miscellaneous Tech News

    News
    83
    7.4k
    2.6m
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • JaredBuschJ
      JaredBusch @Grey
      last edited by

      @Grey said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

      @JaredBusch said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

      @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

      BBC News - New video format 'halves data use of 4K and 8K TVs'
      https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-53322755

      Except a LOT of stuff is still using H.264
      a56ec7a6-5260-4e20-824b-2c7076334d48-image.png

      Neat. 4k movies use a lot of storage and muscle so it'll be good to see this deployed/popular, if it is a good quality.

      I would expect it is. People still complain that H.265 is somehow bad. When it is much more likely a bad source or a dumb ass encoder.

      GreyG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • GreyG
        Grey @JaredBusch
        last edited by

        @JaredBusch said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

        @Grey said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

        @JaredBusch said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

        @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

        BBC News - New video format 'halves data use of 4K and 8K TVs'
        https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-53322755

        Except a LOT of stuff is still using H.264
        a56ec7a6-5260-4e20-824b-2c7076334d48-image.png

        Neat. 4k movies use a lot of storage and muscle so it'll be good to see this deployed/popular, if it is a good quality.

        I would expect it is. People still complain that H.265 is somehow bad. When it is much more likely a bad source or a dumb ass encoder.

        Yeah. Encoding is the worst.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • mlnewsM
          mlnews
          last edited by

          'UK faces mobile blackouts if Huawei 5G ban imposed by 2023'

          BT and Vodafone have said their UK customers would face mobile phone signal blackouts if they are given three years or less to strip Huawei's equipment out of their 5G networks.
          Executives from the network providers told MPs that they wanted at least five years, and ideally seven, if such an order is made. The government is expected to announce new curbs on the use of the Chinese firm's kit within the next two weeks. Huawei has urged it to take more time. "There isn't a burning bridge," said Huawei's UK vice president Jeremy Thompson, adding that it was too soon to determine what impact new US sanctions would have. The company also denied claims it would ever act against its clients' interests, even if told to do so by the Chinese government.

          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @mlnews
            last edited by

            @mlnews said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

            'UK faces mobile blackouts if Huawei 5G ban imposed by 2023'

            BT and Vodafone have said their UK customers would face mobile phone signal blackouts if they are given three years or less to strip Huawei's equipment out of their 5G networks.
            Executives from the network providers told MPs that they wanted at least five years, and ideally seven, if such an order is made. The government is expected to announce new curbs on the use of the Chinese firm's kit within the next two weeks. Huawei has urged it to take more time. "There isn't a burning bridge," said Huawei's UK vice president Jeremy Thompson, adding that it was too soon to determine what impact new US sanctions would have. The company also denied claims it would ever act against its clients' interests, even if told to do so by the Chinese government.

            Wow, the UK and US are just falling farther and farther behind.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • mlnewsM
              mlnews
              last edited by

              TikTok: Amazon says email asking staff to remove app 'sent in error'

              Amazon has said an email sent to employees asking them to remove the video-sharing app TikTok from any mobile device that can access their company email was sent in error.
              An internal memo sent to staff earlier on Friday had said employees should delete the app over "security risks". The app, owned by a Chinese company, has come under scrutiny because of fears it could share data with China. TikTok said it did not understand Amazon's concerns. "This morning's email to some of our employees was sent in error. There is no change to our policies right now with regard to TikTok", a company spokesperson told the BBC. But earlier on Friday, a memo sent to staff seen by multiple news outlets stated that the app must be removed from mobile devices.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • black3dynamiteB
                black3dynamite
                last edited by black3dynamite

                Proxmox Backup Server
                https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-backup-server-beta.72677/
                https://www.proxmox.com/en/downloads/category/proxmox-backup-server

                Proxmox Backup Documentation
                https://www.proxmox.com/en/downloads/item/proxmox-backup-admin-guide

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                • EddieJenningsE
                  EddieJennings
                  last edited by

                  https://fossbytes.com/with-fedora-33-nano-will-be-the-default-terminal-text-editor/

                  I suppose it was inevitable.

                  jmooreJ GreyG scottalanmillerS 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • jmooreJ
                    jmoore @EddieJennings
                    last edited by

                    @EddieJennings said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                    https://fossbytes.com/with-fedora-33-nano-will-be-the-default-terminal-text-editor/

                    I suppose it was inevitable.

                    Anyone know why?

                    EddieJenningsE 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • EddieJenningsE
                      EddieJennings @jmoore
                      last edited by

                      @jmoore said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                      @EddieJennings said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                      https://fossbytes.com/with-fedora-33-nano-will-be-the-default-terminal-text-editor/

                      I suppose it was inevitable.

                      Anyone know why?

                      This gives a little insight.
                      https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/thread/U5C4CC2O44E7Q4MVTT772NP667HTP25S/

                      jmooreJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • GreyG
                        Grey @EddieJennings
                        last edited by

                        @EddieJennings said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                        https://fossbytes.com/with-fedora-33-nano-will-be-the-default-terminal-text-editor/

                        I suppose it was inevitable.

                        I was once interviewed for a job where I said I preferred nano, and this offended one of the people there. I can use vi, but I also like not having to look on a cheat sheet for less-often used commands, whereas I've used pico/nano since the 90s when it was part of pine.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @EddieJennings
                          last edited by

                          @EddieJennings said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                          https://fossbytes.com/with-fedora-33-nano-will-be-the-default-terminal-text-editor/

                          I suppose it was inevitable.

                          So sad. I really hate Nano. I'm sure it's because I learned vi and once you know it, it's so fast and easy. But every time I have to deal with someone using Nano everything is so slow and it's so hard to figure out what it going on.

                          EddieJenningsE black3dynamiteB 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • EddieJenningsE
                            EddieJennings @scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                            @EddieJennings said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                            https://fossbytes.com/with-fedora-33-nano-will-be-the-default-terminal-text-editor/

                            I suppose it was inevitable.

                            So sad. I really hate Nano. I'm sure it's because I learned vi and once you know it, it's so fast and easy. But every time I have to deal with someone using Nano everything is so slow and it's so hard to figure out what it going on.

                            I can empathize. I don't use a ton of features with vi but it's not hard to learn how to write/close a file and search for text. I suppose this would change if I used it more, but Nano just feels awkward to me.

                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller @EddieJennings
                              last edited by

                              @EddieJennings said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                              @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                              @EddieJennings said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                              https://fossbytes.com/with-fedora-33-nano-will-be-the-default-terminal-text-editor/

                              I suppose it was inevitable.

                              So sad. I really hate Nano. I'm sure it's because I learned vi and once you know it, it's so fast and easy. But every time I have to deal with someone using Nano everything is so slow and it's so hard to figure out what it going on.

                              I can empathize. I don't use a ton of features with vi but it's not hard to learn how to write/close a file and search for text. I suppose this would change if I used it more, but Nano just feels awkward to me.

                              Yeah, same here. I have a basic set of editing features that I use every day and it's so fast. With Nano, I find that it takes more steps and is harder to see on many screens.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • jmooreJ
                                jmoore @EddieJennings
                                last edited by

                                @EddieJennings said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                @jmoore said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                @EddieJennings said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                https://fossbytes.com/with-fedora-33-nano-will-be-the-default-terminal-text-editor/

                                I suppose it was inevitable.

                                Anyone know why?

                                This gives a little insight.
                                https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/thread/U5C4CC2O44E7Q4MVTT772NP667HTP25S/

                                Oh I see. I kind of forget sometimes that there is no default editor because I just use vi every time. However I can understand for new users that have just switched over.

                                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @jmoore
                                  last edited by

                                  @jmoore said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                  @EddieJennings said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                  @jmoore said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                  @EddieJennings said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                  https://fossbytes.com/with-fedora-33-nano-will-be-the-default-terminal-text-editor/

                                  I suppose it was inevitable.

                                  Anyone know why?

                                  This gives a little insight.
                                  https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/thread/U5C4CC2O44E7Q4MVTT772NP667HTP25S/

                                  Oh I see. I kind of forget sometimes that there is no default editor because I just use vi every time. However I can understand for new users that have just switched over.

                                  True, I like that a default is being added. But I've seen so many people burned by not learning vi over the years. Seems like setting people up a bit to make it "feel approachable."

                                  That said, I liked the "it asks you what you want" thing from before. Maybe they could put it into the installer so that it's trivial to select at that time if you want vi instead of nano or joe.

                                  jmooreJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • jmooreJ
                                    jmoore @scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                    True, I like that a default is being added. But I've seen so many people burned by not learning vi over the years. Seems like setting people up a bit to make it "feel approachable."

                                    Yeah its good that a default is being included but any Linux user needs to be familiar with most of the basic tools. vi is one of those tools in my opinion because it is so prevalent.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • black3dynamiteB
                                      black3dynamite @scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                      But every time I have to deal with someone using Nano everything is so slow and it's so hard to figure out what it going on.

                                      The same can be said for those using Vi too.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • mlnewsM
                                        mlnews
                                        last edited by

                                        Huawei 5G kit must be removed from UK by 2027

                                        The UK's mobile providers are being banned from buying new Huawei 5G equipment after 31 December, and they must also remove all the Chinese firm's 5G kit from their networks by 2027.
                                        Digital Secretary Oliver Dowden told the House of Commons of the decision. It follows sanctions imposed by Washington, which claims the firm poses a national security threat - something Huawei denies. Mr Dowden said the move would delay the country's 5G rollout by a year. The technology promises faster internet speeds and the capacity to support more wireless devices, which should be a boon to everything from mobile gaming to higher-quality video streams, and even in time driverless cars that talk to each other. 5G connections are already available in dozens of UK cities and towns, but coverage can be sparse. Mr Dowden added that the cumulative cost of the moves when coupled with earlier restrictions announced against Huawei would be up to £2bn.

                                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • scottalanmillerS
                                          scottalanmiller @mlnews
                                          last edited by

                                          @mlnews said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                          Huawei 5G kit must be removed from UK by 2027

                                          The UK's mobile providers are being banned from buying new Huawei 5G equipment after 31 December, and they must also remove all the Chinese firm's 5G kit from their networks by 2027.
                                          Digital Secretary Oliver Dowden told the House of Commons of the decision. It follows sanctions imposed by Washington, which claims the firm poses a national security threat - something Huawei denies. Mr Dowden said the move would delay the country's 5G rollout by a year. The technology promises faster internet speeds and the capacity to support more wireless devices, which should be a boon to everything from mobile gaming to higher-quality video streams, and even in time driverless cars that talk to each other. 5G connections are already available in dozens of UK cities and towns, but coverage can be sparse. Mr Dowden added that the cumulative cost of the moves when coupled with earlier restrictions announced against Huawei would be up to £2bn.

                                          Glad I'm moving out of the tech backwater nations to a place that can actually build national networks. The term "first world" is starting to refer to the more backwards places today.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • hobbit666H
                                            hobbit666
                                            last edited by hobbit666

                                            CVE-2020-1350 | Windows DNS Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

                                            A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Windows Domain Name System servers when they fail to properly handle requests. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could run arbitrary code in the context of the Local System Account. Windows servers that are configured as DNS servers are at risk from this vulnerability.

                                            To exploit the vulnerability, an unauthenticated attacker could send malicious requests to a Windows DNS server.

                                            The update addresses the vulnerability by modifying how Windows DNS servers handle requests

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 298
                                            • 299
                                            • 300
                                            • 301
                                            • 302
                                            • 372
                                            • 373
                                            • 300 / 373
                                            • First post
                                              Last post