Testing oVirt...
-
@stacksofplates said in Testing oVirt...:
@fateknollogee said in Testing oVirt...:
@francesco-provino This is a 3 + 1 node hyperconverged cluster with Gluster, HA, Live Migration etc!
That's what I was wondering. I didn't know if it was a self hosted engine (couldn't think of the name last night) or multiple node setup.
This setup uses the Hosted Engine.
-
@emad-r said in Testing oVirt...:
Very good more pics and stuff please, did you face any hosts disconnections I faced that alot
No host disconnections at all.
The current version (4.2.5) is very easy to setup.
I will post some pics of an upcoming version, oVirt Node (4.3) based on Fedora 28. -
oVirt Node v4.3 (based on Fedora 28) - this is pre-release:
-
So you're saying ovirt is pushing the Xen guys to get into gear as this appears to be the entire package, with FOSS.
-
@dustinb3403 said in Testing oVirt...:
So you're saying ovirt is pushing the Xen guys to get into gear as this appears to be the entire package, with FOSS.
I believe oVirt is being billed as "vSphere for FOSS"
You're probably not going to move the Xen/XS/XCP-ng guys off their spot.
-
Can we use the oVirt system to manage an existing KVM server?
( I want to try oVirt, but really don't want to wipe out the system I currently have set up ) -
@dafyre said in Testing oVirt...:
Can we use the oVirt system to manage an existing KVM server?
( I want to try oVirt, but really don't want to wipe out the system I currently have set up )I tried setting up oVirt a few versions ago and from what I could find, it's almost expected you have a minimum of 3 physical hosts for it.
So no, you won't be able to manage a standalone KVM server since everything has to get built to be managed by the oVirt Engine.
-
@dafyre said in Testing oVirt...:
Can we use the oVirt system to manage an existing KVM server?
( I want to try oVirt, but really don't want to wipe out the system I currently have set up )Unfortunately not.
-
Let us talk about Gluster, how do you feel safe with it ?
saw you choose an option with RAID 6, i dont get that cause from my trial, I make RAID and group disks then create Gluster volume from those mdraid volume, but it seems you did RAID 6 afterwards, hmm whats the logic behind that ?
What type of Gluster volume are you using, just distributed ?
I m still learning HCI so thus the beginner vibe
-
@francesco-provino said in Testing oVirt...:
Any real advantage vs plain KVM?
Scaling KVM basically, if you have 1 or 2 KVM servers thats fine, but if you want more you need better management that logging in each one.
-
@emad-r said in Testing oVirt...:
Let us talk about Gluster, how do you feel safe with it ?
saw you choose an option with RAID 6, i dont get that cause from my trial, I make RAID and group disks then create Gluster volume from those mdraid volume, but it seems you did RAID 6 afterwards, hmm whats the logic behind that ?
What type of Gluster volume are you using, just distributed ?
I m still learning HCI so thus the beginner vibe
No RAID6, I'm using RAID10.
Gluster volume is Replicate + Arbiter
This is a good blog post to get you started: https://www.ovirt.org/blog/2018/02/up-and-running-with-ovirt-4-2-and-gluster-storage/
-
@dustinb3403 said in Testing oVirt...:
@dafyre said in Testing oVirt...:
Can we use the oVirt system to manage an existing KVM server?
( I want to try oVirt, but really don't want to wipe out the system I currently have set up )I tried setting up oVirt a few versions ago and from what I could find, it's almost expected you have a minimum of 3 physical hosts for it.
So no, you won't be able to manage a standalone KVM server since everything has to get built to be managed by the oVirt Engine.
You can now do a single host w Gluster:
https://www.ovirt.org/documentation/gluster-hyperconverged/chap-Single_node_hyperconverged/Here's a screenshot of my single node install:
-
@emad-r said in Testing oVirt...:
Let us talk about Gluster, how do you feel safe with it ?
Not sure, since I'm new to the whole Gluster concept.
saw you choose an option with RAID 6, i dont get that cause from my trial, I make RAID and group disks then create Gluster volume from those mdraid volume, but it seems you did RAID 6 afterwards, hmm whats the logic behind that ?
Hardware RAID is recommended instead of MDADM.
-
@fateknollogee Hardware RAID is recommended because a lot of people lack the practice and skill with software RAID to appropriately maintain/troubleshoot/fix software raid.
Plus you often get features like Blind swap.
-
@dustinb3403 said in Testing oVirt...:
@fateknollogee Hardware RAID is recommended because a lot of people lack the practice and skill with software RAID to appropriately maintain/troubleshoot/fix software raid.
Plus you often get features like Blind swap.
Nope...
The folks at RH say, currently, performance is better with HW RAID & that is how most of their testing/validation is done. -
@fateknollogee said in Testing oVirt...:
@dustinb3403 said in Testing oVirt...:
@fateknollogee Hardware RAID is recommended because a lot of people lack the practice and skill with software RAID to appropriately maintain/troubleshoot/fix software raid.
Plus you often get features like Blind swap.
Nope...
The folks at RH say, currently, performance is better with HW RAID & that is how most of their testing/validation is done.That's odd, but okay. I would generally think they make the recommendation because they know there is a huge lack of understanding on how software raid needs to be managed.
-
@emad-r said in Testing oVirt...:
Let us talk about Gluster, how do you feel safe with it ?
I'm guessing you really don't know much about Gluster and it's history?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/GlusterThink of it like RAID, but spread over a network instead of locally. It's been around since 2005, and is used by some very large cloud providers today.
So I feel totally safe with it, and actually deployed it once. Great platform when it's needed, and a complete waste of time when it's not.
-
@travisdh1 said in Testing oVirt...:
@emad-r said in Testing oVirt...:
Let us talk about Gluster, how do you feel safe with it ?
I'm guessing you really don't know much about Gluster and it's history?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/GlusterThink of it like RAID, but spread over a network instead of locally. It's been around since 2005, and is used by some very large cloud providers today.
So I feel totally safe with it, and actually deployed it once. Great platform when it's needed, and a complete waste of time when it's not.
That and Gluster is not a replacement for good backups.
-
@dustinb3403 said in Testing oVirt...:
@fateknollogee said in Testing oVirt...:
@dustinb3403 said in Testing oVirt...:
@fateknollogee Hardware RAID is recommended because a lot of people lack the practice and skill with software RAID to appropriately maintain/troubleshoot/fix software raid.
Plus you often get features like Blind swap.
Nope...
The folks at RH say, currently, performance is better with HW RAID & that is how most of their testing/validation is done.That's odd, but okay. I would generally think they make the recommendation because they know there is a huge lack of understanding on how software raid needs to be managed.
I'm also guessing it's because RAID isn't necessarily needed. The overhead for software RAID doesn't gain much if you're bricks are replicated anyway.
-
3 + 1 node hyperconverged: Volume layout
