ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Fedora Love

    IT Discussion
    fedora
    14
    58
    4.7k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • black3dynamiteB
      black3dynamite
      last edited by

      Damn, that was a challenge typing that on a phone.

      warren.stanleyW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • warren.stanleyW
        warren.stanley @black3dynamite
        last edited by

        @black3dynamite said in Fedora Love:

        Damn, that was a challenge typing that on a phone.

        Haha! You did well 😄

        I'd seen the article on the inclusion of select 3rd party repos with Workstation, this piqued my interest on revisiting Fedora. ScreenConnect was my drama though, hence Cinnamon. I've been doing digging on what these Repo changes actually are and how to enact on Cinnamon (given no Gnome and if that mattered) .

        I've just been looking at a posting on the Fedora Forums talking about it . Seems that there's differences from what you get enabling through Workstation (and Gnome Software) and using sudo dnf install fedora-workstation-repositories on other Spins.

        black3dynamiteB Emad RE 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • black3dynamiteB
          black3dynamite @warren.stanley
          last edited by

          @warren-stanley said in Fedora Love:

          @black3dynamite said in Fedora Love:

          Damn, that was a challenge typing that on a phone.

          Haha! You did well 😄

          I'd seen the article on the inclusion of select 3rd party repos with Workstation, this piqued my interest on revisiting Fedora. ScreenConnect was my drama though, hence Cinnamon. I've been doing digging on what these Repo changes actually are and how to enact on Cinnamon (given no Gnome and if that mattered) .

          I've just been looking at a posting on the Fedora Forums talking about it . Seems that there's differences from what you get enabling through Workstation (and Gnome Software) and using sudo dnf install fedora-workstation-repositories on other Spins.

          ScreenConnect doesn’t work well or at all on Fedora workstation because of Wayland, which is the default display server protocol. You have to switch to xorg or just disable Wayland instead. Cinnamon doesn’t only use x11/xorg.

          JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • JaredBuschJ
            JaredBusch @black3dynamite
            last edited by

            @black3dynamite said in Fedora Love:

            @warren-stanley said in Fedora Love:

            @black3dynamite said in Fedora Love:

            Damn, that was a challenge typing that on a phone.

            Haha! You did well 😄

            I'd seen the article on the inclusion of select 3rd party repos with Workstation, this piqued my interest on revisiting Fedora. ScreenConnect was my drama though, hence Cinnamon. I've been doing digging on what these Repo changes actually are and how to enact on Cinnamon (given no Gnome and if that mattered) .

            I've just been looking at a posting on the Fedora Forums talking about it . Seems that there's differences from what you get enabling through Workstation (and Gnome Software) and using sudo dnf install fedora-workstation-repositories on other Spins.

            ScreenConnect doesn’t work well or at all on Fedora workstation because of Wayland, which is the default display server protocol. You have to switch to xorg or just disable Wayland instead. Cinnamon doesn’t only use x11/xorg.

            Don't know what you are talking about. I've been Korora/Fedora for over almost 2 years now and have always used ScreenConnect.

            black3dynamiteB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • black3dynamiteB
              black3dynamite @JaredBusch
              last edited by

              @JaredBusch said in Fedora Love:

              @black3dynamite said in Fedora Love:

              @warren-stanley said in Fedora Love:

              @black3dynamite said in Fedora Love:

              Damn, that was a challenge typing that on a phone.

              Haha! You did well 😄

              I'd seen the article on the inclusion of select 3rd party repos with Workstation, this piqued my interest on revisiting Fedora. ScreenConnect was my drama though, hence Cinnamon. I've been doing digging on what these Repo changes actually are and how to enact on Cinnamon (given no Gnome and if that mattered) .

              I've just been looking at a posting on the Fedora Forums talking about it . Seems that there's differences from what you get enabling through Workstation (and Gnome Software) and using sudo dnf install fedora-workstation-repositories on other Spins.

              ScreenConnect doesn’t work well or at all on Fedora workstation because of Wayland, which is the default display server protocol. You have to switch to xorg or just disable Wayland instead. Cinnamon doesn’t only use x11/xorg.

              Don't know what you are talking about. I've been Korora/Fedora for over almost 2 years now and have always used ScreenConnect.

              It worked because you were using xorg and not Wayland. Fedora workstation, the gnome version is using Wayland by default.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • Emad RE
                Emad R @warren.stanley
                last edited by

                @warren-stanley

                Interesting concept when snaps and flatpacks take over, would it matter to have Fedora or Ubuntu ?

                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @Emad R
                  last edited by

                  @Emad-R said in Fedora Love:

                  @warren-stanley

                  Interesting concept when snaps and flatpacks take over, would it matter to have Fedora or Ubuntu ?

                  Snaps and Flatpack are already here and are nothing but "yet another packaging format." Fedora vs Ubuntu differences still remain. They aren't separated primarily by their package managers.

                  black3dynamiteB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • black3dynamiteB
                    black3dynamite @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    @scottalanmiller said in Fedora Love:

                    @Emad-R said in Fedora Love:

                    @warren-stanley

                    Interesting concept when snaps and flatpacks take over, would it matter to have Fedora or Ubuntu ?

                    Snaps and Flatpack are already here and are nothing but "yet another packaging format." Fedora vs Ubuntu differences still remain. They aren't separated primarily by their package managers.

                    The one different with snap on Fedora compare to ubuntu is that SELinux can cause issues with snap apps.

                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @black3dynamite
                      last edited by

                      @black3dynamite said in Fedora Love:

                      @scottalanmiller said in Fedora Love:

                      @Emad-R said in Fedora Love:

                      @warren-stanley

                      Interesting concept when snaps and flatpacks take over, would it matter to have Fedora or Ubuntu ?

                      Snaps and Flatpack are already here and are nothing but "yet another packaging format." Fedora vs Ubuntu differences still remain. They aren't separated primarily by their package managers.

                      The one different with snap on Fedora compare to ubuntu is that SELinux can cause issues with snap apps.

                      If you don't want that, though, just turn it off. Then you are in the same boat as Ubuntu without it anyway.

                      black3dynamiteB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • warren.stanleyW
                        warren.stanley
                        last edited by

                        @Emad-R I think there's subtle differences, especially relating to seamless integration with particular distros. This might be down to the differences / approaches @scottalanmiller mentioned between the distros (and if the developers have a particular distro persuasion one way or the other - despite aiming to be agnostic)

                        I stumbled across Alexander Larrson's blog, interesting reading, even a Flatpak on WSL post!

                        I just hope that maybe, given these are fresh initiatives in a time of ever-increasing current security and privacy concerns, we're going to benefit from a better way of doing things?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • black3dynamiteB
                          black3dynamite @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          @scottalanmiller said in Fedora Love:

                          @black3dynamite said in Fedora Love:

                          @scottalanmiller said in Fedora Love:

                          @Emad-R said in Fedora Love:

                          @warren-stanley

                          Interesting concept when snaps and flatpacks take over, would it matter to have Fedora or Ubuntu ?

                          Snaps and Flatpack are already here and are nothing but "yet another packaging format." Fedora vs Ubuntu differences still remain. They aren't separated primarily by their package managers.

                          The one different with snap on Fedora compare to ubuntu is that SELinux can cause issues with snap apps.

                          If you don't want that, though, just turn it off. Then you are in the same boat as Ubuntu without it anyway.

                          Yeah, SELinux is disabled on my Fedora workstation. Too many annoying crashes because of it. I’m all good with keeping in enabled on my server installs.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • 1
                          • 2
                          • 3
                          • 3 / 3
                          • First post
                            Last post