ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Saving space by leaving NTFS hard links with tree size pro

    IT Discussion
    4
    6
    461
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      shutdown_engineer
      last edited by

      We have local disk storage and am trying to free up some space on a win 2008 file Server. I'm using Tree size pro and see we have piles of duplicates.

      Any idea of leaving NTFS hard links will cause me any issues down the line? The files are a complete mix of word, excel and jpegs. We have good backups just in case 🙂
      Thanks.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DustinB3403D
        DustinB3403
        last edited by

        Rather than trying to remove hard links I would look at applying some kind of deduplication to your file server.

        https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/data-deduplication/understand

        JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • JaredBuschJ
          JaredBusch @DustinB3403
          last edited by

          @dustinb3403 said in Saving space by leaving NTFS hard links with tree size pro:

          Rather than trying to remove hard links I would look at applying some kind of deduplication to your file server.

          https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/data-deduplication/understand

          You (and @travisdh1 for upvoting) need to read more.. Server 2008 was clearly stated. There is nothing for Server 2008. Even your link states that Server 2008 R2 was the first to have the old infrastructure called "Single Instance Store"

          DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            manxam
            last edited by

            Not to seem daft, but wouldn't removing the duplicates entirely in order to clean up the file tree/structure make more sense in the long run? I understand that specific users may look in a specific folder for a file expecting it to be there, whereas another user would look another place, but I'd use this time to make the appropriate folder structure and place the files where they belong...

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DustinB3403D
              DustinB3403
              last edited by

              This post is deleted!
              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DustinB3403D
                DustinB3403 @JaredBusch
                last edited by

                @jaredbusch said in Saving space by leaving NTFS hard links with tree size pro:

                @dustinb3403 said in Saving space by leaving NTFS hard links with tree size pro:

                Rather than trying to remove hard links I would look at applying some kind of deduplication to your file server.

                https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/data-deduplication/understand

                You (and @travisdh1 for upvoting) need to read more.. Server 2008 was clearly stated. There is nothing for Server 2008. Even your link states that Server 2008 R2 was the first to have the old infrastructure called "Single Instance Store"

                And your assumption that @shutdown_engineer isn't running R2 is somehow more accurate? And not for nothing, but there are deduplication tools, that can be run on Server 2008 outside of what's provided by microsoft. This was a simple reference to the functionality.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • 1 / 1
                • First post
                  Last post