Is JBOD Considered a Type of RAID?
-
I should add this is a Tier II I was talking to.
-
@thanksaj said:
I should add this is a Tier II I was talking to.
Tier II in a corporate environment doesn't really mean much. They don't get to touch alot of equipment and are usually somewhat of a horse with blinders on
-
@IRJ said:
@thanksaj said:
I should add this is a Tier II I was talking to.
Tier II in a corporate environment doesn't really mean much. They don't get to touch alot of equipment and are usually somewhat of a horse with blinders on
Same tech was using the terms incremental and differential interchangeably, in terms of backups.
-
@thanksaj said:
Ok, but to confirm my answer, JBOD is NOT a type of RAID. Which is what I wanted to confirm, because that's what I said. I told him JBOD is anti-RAID.
It's not anti-RAID, it doesn't block RAID at another level or anything like that. It is simply the term that exists to denote when a group of disks exist but are not RAID. The term only exists as an opposite to RAID.
-
@thanksaj said:
I should add this is a Tier II I was talking to.
AKA Very, very junior.
This is Tier II... helpdesk?
-
@thanksaj said:
Same tech was using the terms incremental and differential interchangeably, in terms of backups.
Yeah, sounds like Tier II is likely a post intern, but very junior position. Those are very basic terms.
-
@IRJ said:
Tier II in a corporate environment doesn't really mean much. They don't get to touch alot of equipment and are usually somewhat of a horse with blinders on
Tiers in general mean nothing. I never saw any environment use them until I saw SMB communities talk about them. It is some weird thing that happens when small business isolated IT people try to extrapolate what they imagine enterprise IT must be like and this weirdness results.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@thanksaj said:
Ok, but to confirm my answer, JBOD is NOT a type of RAID. Which is what I wanted to confirm, because that's what I said. I told him JBOD is anti-RAID.
It's not anti-RAID, it doesn't block RAID at another level or anything like that. It is simply the term that exists to denote when a group of disks exist but are not RAID. The term only exists as an opposite to RAID.
Ok, I was using anti as opposite. My bad.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@thanksaj said:
I should add this is a Tier II I was talking to.
AKA Very, very junior.
This is Tier II... helpdesk?
He's at least 10 years older than me.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@IRJ said:
Tier II in a corporate environment doesn't really mean much. They don't get to touch alot of equipment and are usually somewhat of a horse with blinders on
Tiers in general mean nothing. I never saw any environment use them until I saw SMB communities talk about them. It is some weird thing that happens when small business isolated IT people try to extrapolate what they imagine enterprise IT must be like and this weirdness results.
I worked corporate (Lockheed Martin) IT Helpdesk and later Tier 2 priority management. Even the term management meant basically nothing. I just managed assigning tickets to other Teir 2 techs.
Low level corporate IT is tough. You tend to do things in a way that is so proprietary its not even funny. Yet you know nothing about the actual infrastructure. Almost all software is made in house or at least heavily modified.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@thanksaj said:
Same tech was using the terms incremental and differential interchangeably, in terms of backups.
Yeah, sounds like Tier II is likely a post intern, but very junior position. Those are very basic terms.
He's one of the best we have on this product for Tier II. I was just surprised at the blatant ignorance on the basic term. Basically, that's what I don't want to become working proprietary software support. You get good at one or two products, but start losing your general IT grasps.
-
@IRJ said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@IRJ said:
Tier II in a corporate environment doesn't really mean much. They don't get to touch alot of equipment and are usually somewhat of a horse with blinders on
Tiers in general mean nothing. I never saw any environment use them until I saw SMB communities talk about them. It is some weird thing that happens when small business isolated IT people try to extrapolate what they imagine enterprise IT must be like and this weirdness results.
I worked corporate (Lockheed Martin) IT Helpdesk and later Tier 2 priority management. Even the term management meant basically nothing. I just managed assigning tickets to other Teir 2 techs.
Low level corporate IT is tough. You tend to do things in a way that is so proprietary its not even funny. Yet you know nothing about the actual infrastructure. Almost all software is made in house or at least heavily modified.
Most of the software my company sells was not made by them. They bought the company that produced it, they rebranded it, and now they train people to support it. So it's almost all secondhand training.
-
@thanksaj said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@thanksaj said:
Same tech was using the terms incremental and differential interchangeably, in terms of backups.
Yeah, sounds like Tier II is likely a post intern, but very junior position. Those are very basic terms.
He's one of the best we have on this product for Tier II. I was just surprised at the blatant ignorance on the basic term. Basically, that's what I don't want to become working proprietary software support. You get good at one or two products, but start losing your general IT grasps.
Like I said, things become so proprietary its not even funny. If you were to place this guy in a SMB environment, he would likely be lost
-
I was really good friends with a guy when I first started at Lockheed Martin almost 10 years ago. We went to tech school together and I helped get him the job. He was a really bright guy. He stayed at Lockheed Martin's help desk and I moved in to a new, higher position every 2-3 years.
I met up with him recently and I can't believe how lost he was about everything. He is the best tech at the helpdesk, but all he knows is all that Lockheed Propriety software. He hasn't got a chance to practice networking, Windows Server (since 2003), or anything else that is actually useful everywhere else.
-
@IRJ said:
I was really good friends with a guy when I first started at Lockheed Martin almost 10 years ago. We went to tech school together and I helped get him the job. He was a really bright guy. He stayed at Lockheed Martin's help desk and I moved in to a new, higher position every 2-3 years.
I met up with him recently and I can't believe how lost he was about everything. He is the best tech at the helpdesk, but all he knows is all that Lockheed Propriety software. He hasn't got a chance to practice networking, Windows Server (since 2003), or anything else that is actually useful everywhere else.
My EXACT fear staying where I am longer than I have to.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
What you are selling is a disk shelf. It is just a shelf that holds disks, that's it. It's a dumb unit (literally, as in it contains no logic.) It is metal and cables. A JBOD shelf is something you can easily construct in your garage. It's only marginally able to be called a "device" as it is just a holding container for disks, their power and their cables. You could make one of these with a bunch of USB cables hanging out of the back and call it the same thing. It's little different than taking a wood box and putting slots in it to hold external drives and danging the USB connectors out the back. It will work, but who would use that in a business?
When people talk about DAS and SAN, they are talking "disk arrays", not "disk shelves." This isn't a hard and fast rule, but it applies ~99% of the time. If you make a SAN out of a JBOD you have a total disaster on your hands, but it can be done. The Netgear SC101 is the most ridiculous SAN unit ever, and that is what it was. To be an array means that the disks work together (RAID) and that means that the logic, the controller, is inside the disk array. So a disk array, as everyone who says DAS or SAN means to imply, always has a controller. A JBOD shelf lacks that controller.
I don't think I agree with you on this Scott. DAS, from my experience IS just a shelf of drives with either one or two scsi/SAS cables to a SCSI/SAS controller that is inside the server. The controller isn't in the external drive box. Though I will say I haven't dealt with this level of tech in quite some time, so perhaps it's changed and the controller is always in the external box now, but what would you be plugging into? Something in the PCIe slot I would assume - and what would that card be if not a controller?
-
@thanksaj said:
@IRJ said:
I was really good friends with a guy when I first started at Lockheed Martin almost 10 years ago. We went to tech school together and I helped get him the job. He was a really bright guy. He stayed at Lockheed Martin's help desk and I moved in to a new, higher position every 2-3 years.
I met up with him recently and I can't believe how lost he was about everything. He is the best tech at the helpdesk, but all he knows is all that Lockheed Propriety software. He hasn't got a chance to practice networking, Windows Server (since 2003), or anything else that is actually useful everywhere else.
My EXACT fear staying where I am longer than I have to.
i followed a similiar path as you. Best Buy, Lockheed Martin HelpDesk, and then I get my first admin position
-
@Dashrender said:
I don't think I agree with you on this Scott. DAS, from my experience IS just a shelf of drives with either one or two scsi/SAS cables to a SCSI/SAS controller that is inside the server. The controller isn't in the external drive box. Though I will say I haven't dealt with this level of tech in quite some time, so perhaps it's changed and the controller is always in the external box now, but what would you be plugging into? Something in the PCIe slot I would assume - and what would that card be if not a controller?
It can be. That is a DAS disk shelf, then (JBOD) and not what most people expect when they are buying enteprise storage.
Every time that people talk about DAS in a discussion like this, you can safely assume that they meant to imply that it had its own controller internal. That's why people talk about single or dual controller enclosures, no one ever talks about a no-controller enclosure.
Remember that RAID encapsulates disks and makes them appear as... disks. So the connector for a RAID array is SAS or SATA, just like it is for a single drive. It connects to an external SAS connector on your server (or desktop.) It attaches just like any other external hard drive. To the server, there is literally no way to tell, logically or physically, when it is talking to a single disk or when it is talking to a disk array.
-
@Dashrender said:
Something in the PCIe slot I would assume - and what would that card be if not a controller?
It's called an HBA but it is just a SAS adapter. Or a RAID controller. RAID can attach to RAID. It is the same interface in every direction so you ca stack them indefinitely.
-
@IRJ said:
I met up with him recently and I can't believe how lost he was about everything. He is the best tech at the helpdesk, but all he knows is all that Lockheed Propriety software. He hasn't taken the time on his own to practice networking, Windows Server (since 2003), or anything else that is actually useful everywhere else.
Fixed that for you.
