Which cloud server can be the best alternative of DigitalOcean?
-
Which cloud server can be the best alternative of DigitalOcean?
-
@masterarts said in Which cloud server can be the best alternative of DigitalOcean?:
Which cloud server can be the best alternative of DigitalOcean?
I like Vultr
-
We moved from DO to Vultr as well. Significantly better.
-
Also on Vultr. Very affordable and no issues.
-
I've switched most of my stuff to Vultr as well. Performance and uptime is really good. However, I have never used DO, so I can't compare.
-
We deployed our FreePBX server in Vultr. Working like a charm.
-
I haven't tried Vultr yet, only Azure, GCP, and Godaddy.
Performance wise, Azure and GCP are excellent. The same specs on Vultr are way cheaper... so I am reluctant to try it.
But I did see that if you want the same kind of performance from Vultr as you would get from GCP, then you need buy at least the $20 tier from Vultr. It seems you need 2 CPUs from Vultr to get the same performance as 1 CPU from GCP... at least according to graphs and comparisons I've seen.
Anyone have additional input or personal experience comparing the two?
-
@tim_g said in Which cloud server can be the best alternative of DigitalOcean?:
Performance wise, Azure and GCP are excellent.
That's a surpirsing finding. Azure's claim to fame is that its performance is terrible. AWS beats it heavily with equal specs. And Vultr crushes AWS in value for performance. Azure is, ot he best of my knowledge, the lowest performance well known platform.
-
@tim_g said in Which cloud server can be the best alternative of DigitalOcean?:
Anyone have additional input or personal experience comparing the two?
Haven't compared Google Cloud, but when we did performance tests previously Vultr was the performance winner across the board. It was the gastest for its specs, and its specs were half the price of anyone but Linode. So you got better than double performance per dollar.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Which cloud server can be the best alternative of DigitalOcean?:
@tim_g said in Which cloud server can be the best alternative of DigitalOcean?:
Anyone have additional input or personal experience comparing the two?
Haven't compared Google Cloud, but when we did performance tests previously Vultr was the performance winner across the board. It was the gastest for its specs, and its specs were half the price of anyone but Linode. So you got better than double performance per dollar.
I'll have to test it out head-to-head with the same specs as my GCP server. I don't have the money to buy a Vultr instance just to do a good comparison.
To do a real and fair test, I would need a 1CPU, 4GB RAM, and 50GB SSD Vultr VPS. Would they do a 1month trial? If they did, and Vultr performed better, I'd switch.
-
@tim_g said in Which cloud server can be the best alternative of DigitalOcean?:
To do a real and fair test, I would need a 1CPU, 4GB RAM, and 50GB SSD Vultr VPS. Would they do a 1month trial? If they did, and Vultr performed better, I'd switch.
What do you mean? It's cloud computing, you pay by the minute that you use it. There is no "buying" concept. It's only a few cents to test performance.
-
It depends on the requirements.
Let me give you an example. If your targeted audience is in Canada. You don't have any choice except DO or AWS because they both have a data-center there.
However, if your targeted audience is from the UK. You have many alternatives like Linode, Vultr, GCE, Amazon, Kyup etc.. They all have a data-center in the UK.
-
I'm on Vultr as well. It's working well for me.
-
@mustaasamsaleem said in Which cloud server can be the best alternative of DigitalOcean?:
It depends on the requirements.
Let me give you an example. If your targeted audience is in Canada. You don't have any choice except DO or AWS because they both have a data-center there.
However, if your targeted audience is from the UK. You have many alternatives like Linode, Vultr, GCE, Amazon, Kyup etc.. They all have a data-center in the UK.
Curious as to why this matters? I get that latency is a thing but is it often enough to make a modern application suffer?
-
@coliver said in Which cloud server can be the best alternative of DigitalOcean?:
@mustaasamsaleem said in Which cloud server can be the best alternative of DigitalOcean?:
It depends on the requirements.
Let me give you an example. If your targeted audience is in Canada. You don't have any choice except DO or AWS because they both have a data-center there.
However, if your targeted audience is from the UK. You have many alternatives like Linode, Vultr, GCE, Amazon, Kyup etc.. They all have a data-center in the UK.
Curious as to why this matters? I get that latency is a thing but is it often enough to make a modern application suffer?
Lots of companies need hosting either in their own country, or in a country that protects them. So US hosting is the number one distrusted or disallowed location for hosting world wide. Much of Asia falls into a similar "can't use" tier for most of the world. Some places, like Japan and Singapore, are exceptions. If you are from a country or business looking to protect your data and are from the western or Latin world, you generally look at locality and require hosting in Europe or Canada.
As Americans, remote hosting does not afford us protections, so we don't think about these things.
-
I use Vultr and AWS at the moment. I have free Azure VMS with RDS that work well for us.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Which cloud server can be the best alternative of DigitalOcean?:
@coliver said in Which cloud server can be the best alternative of DigitalOcean?:
@mustaasamsaleem said in Which cloud server can be the best alternative of DigitalOcean?:
It depends on the requirements.
Let me give you an example. If your targeted audience is in Canada. You don't have any choice except DO or AWS because they both have a data-center there.
However, if your targeted audience is from the UK. You have many alternatives like Linode, Vultr, GCE, Amazon, Kyup etc.. They all have a data-center in the UK.
Curious as to why this matters? I get that latency is a thing but is it often enough to make a modern application suffer?
Lots of companies need hosting either in their own country, or in a country that protects them. So US hosting is the number one distrusted or disallowed location for hosting world wide. Much of Asia falls into a similar "can't use" tier for most of the world. Some places, like Japan and Singapore, are exceptions. If you are from a country or business looking to protect your data and are from the western or Latin world, you generally look at locality and require hosting in Europe or Canada.
As Americans, remote hosting does not afford us protections, so we don't think about these things.
Got it.
-
@coliver said in Which cloud server can be the best alternative of DigitalOcean?:
@scottalanmiller said in Which cloud server can be the best alternative of DigitalOcean?:
@coliver said in Which cloud server can be the best alternative of DigitalOcean?:
@mustaasamsaleem said in Which cloud server can be the best alternative of DigitalOcean?:
It depends on the requirements.
Let me give you an example. If your targeted audience is in Canada. You don't have any choice except DO or AWS because they both have a data-center there.
However, if your targeted audience is from the UK. You have many alternatives like Linode, Vultr, GCE, Amazon, Kyup etc.. They all have a data-center in the UK.
Curious as to why this matters? I get that latency is a thing but is it often enough to make a modern application suffer?
Lots of companies need hosting either in their own country, or in a country that protects them. So US hosting is the number one distrusted or disallowed location for hosting world wide. Much of Asia falls into a similar "can't use" tier for most of the world. Some places, like Japan and Singapore, are exceptions. If you are from a country or business looking to protect your data and are from the western or Latin world, you generally look at locality and require hosting in Europe or Canada.
As Americans, remote hosting does not afford us protections, so we don't think about these things.
Got it.
For EU Companies it is often a legal thing. For pretty much any data they are literally banned from letting it touch US soil. It's not just company decisions, but legal ones.
-
Also on Vultr.
-
Vultr as well.
