ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Looking to buy a NAS to store graphics files long-term.

    IT Discussion
    9
    40
    3.7k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DashrenderD
      Dashrender
      last edited by

      Scott has listed specific distros in the past that he recommends, but I can't recall off the top of my head.

      coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • coliverC
        coliver @Dashrender
        last edited by

        @Dashrender said in Looking to buy a NAS to store graphics files long-term.:

        Scott has listed specific distros in the past that he recommends, but I can't recall off the top of my head.

        They're at the link.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • DustinB3403D
          DustinB3403
          last edited by DustinB3403

          I know I missed most of this conversation, but at the requested 12TB and for cheap, wouldn't a 4-6 bay synology in RAID6 be enough?

          Four 8 TB drives in RAID6 provide ~16.5TB of storage. The DS916+ empty is $600, add the four 8TB drives and you're talking only $1500.

          Which is really a low cost approach.

          MattSpellerM scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • MattSpellerM
            MattSpeller
            last edited by

            Synology

            Start with large disks and it should leave the company some room to grow.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • MattSpellerM
              MattSpeller @DustinB3403
              last edited by

              @DustinB3403 said in Looking to buy a NAS to store graphics files long-term.:

              I know I missed most of this conversation, but at the requested 12TB and for cheap, wouldn't a 4-6 bay synology in RAID6 be enough?

              Four 8 TB drives in RAID6 provide ~16.5TB of storage. The DS916+ empty is $600, add the four 8TB drives and you're talking only $1500.

              Which is really a low cost approach.

              Four 8TB drives in RAID10 provides 16TB of faster storage 😉

              DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • DustinB3403D
                DustinB3403 @MattSpeller
                last edited by

                @MattSpeller True.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • MattSpellerM
                  MattSpeller
                  last edited by MattSpeller

                  5 bay, you can load it right full of huge drives for slow and stable storage

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • MattSpellerM
                    MattSpeller
                    last edited by

                    8 bay, you can load it right full of huge drives and RAID10 it for higher performance

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @art_of_shred
                      last edited by

                      @art_of_shred said in Looking to buy a NAS to store graphics files long-term.:

                      The graphics RIP software opens files that are currently on the lead graphics guy's hard drive, and sends them to the printer. That space will be too small going forward, so they want a storage space that will be adequate, that they can point the RIP software to, to grab graphics files. It's that simple. Because of the possible size they are thinking about providing, I wondered if a NAS was the best move for the buck. Maybe I'm not accurate on what things cost, but heading towards a server doesn't seem to be a cost-effective solution.

                      An external drive on his desktop seems like it would be even more transparent to everything involved.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @FATeknollogee
                        last edited by

                        @FATeknollogee said in Looking to buy a NAS to store graphics files long-term.:

                        @scottalanmiller said in Looking to buy a NAS to store graphics files long-term.:

                        If there is long term growth, how big will it get? Rack mount units are a bit more expensive.

                        SAM-SD is, of course, totally viable and a Dell R510 from xByte ....

                        Sorry for the quick threadjack...
                        What would be the OS of choice on the SAM-SD?

                        Depends on the specific need. But CentOS or Suse most often. FreeBSD in many cases. Windows in a few.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
                          last edited by

                          @DustinB3403 said in Looking to buy a NAS to store graphics files long-term.:

                          I know I missed most of this conversation, but at the requested 12TB and for cheap, wouldn't a 4-6 bay synology in RAID6 be enough?

                          Four 8 TB drives in RAID6 provide ~16.5TB of storage. The DS916+ empty is $600, add the four 8TB drives and you're talking only $1500.

                          Which is really a low cost approach.

                          Six bat is too much. Four bay is way cheaper and more than enough.

                          DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DustinB3403D
                            DustinB3403 @scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            @scottalanmiller Oh I agree, mroe than 4 is likely overkill. Especially considering that you can buy an expansion bay for most of the Synology line if you need it further down the road.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • larsen161L
                              larsen161
                              last edited by larsen161

                              Or look at putting in smaller local storage server just for frequently used data and connect to AWS Storage Gateway using a Cached Volume architecture.

                              Gives you fast local access to data and scalability to grow to any size and then put policies on data in S3 to move to glacier or purge.

                              0_1483206153469_aws-storage-gateway-cached-diagram.png

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • DashrenderD
                                Dashrender
                                last edited by

                                https://mangolassi.it/topic/12033/backup-target-2-or-4-drive-nas/15

                                I talked about pricing at this range recently.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • 1
                                • 2
                                • 2 / 2
                                • First post
                                  Last post