ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Time syncronisation in domain

    IT Discussion
    9
    48
    3.1k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller @Dashrender
      last edited by

      @Dashrender said in Time syncronisation in domain:

      @dafyre said in Time syncronisation in domain:

      @Dashrender said in Time syncronisation in domain:

      @scottalanmiller said in Time syncronisation in domain:

      @dafyre said in Time syncronisation in domain:

      @scottalanmiller said in Time syncronisation in domain:

      @JaredBusch said in Time syncronisation in domain:

      @JaredBusch if this is an Offline LAN, then there would be no "local" time source at all, and no point to discuss the domain. Set the server to a global time source, confirm the BIOS battery is good.

      Of course there is a source. It is the local hardware.

      Could be the virtual clock, too. Which might explain the drift.

      It's possible, but pretty sure this isn't true here, that it would be something like a GPS adapter. Lots of larger companies wanting the offline LAN use a $50 GPS adapter to get really solid time for cheap without a network connection. It's accurate to a few milliseconds and cheap.

      In the financial world, we used Cesium clocks. Tens of thousands of dollars and use a sensor to measure radioactive Cesium decay. Accurate to nanoseconds.

      So this becomes a question for @meghal ... Do you have any kind of special hardware that provides a way for your DC to get its time without an internet conneciton -- or are you just using the time settings from the OS?

      And is the OS seeing a physical clock or a virtual one? And is there a healthy battery on that clock?

      Does VMWare 5, 6 or 7 use the hardware clock and pass that information along to the VMs?

      I was under the impression that all Hypervisors did this now days.

      Why would you not have been under this impression in the ESX 4 days? But clearly that wasn't the case as Scott mentioned above.

      I'm not sure when they resolved a lot of that. I know is GSX / Server 2 days it wasn't there. I know that it is now. Somewhere in between it changed 🙂

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • T
        tiagom
        last edited by

        We use a Meinberg in Stratum 1 mode, its good to a few microseconds.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • T
          tiagom
          last edited by

          Here are my command notes when i setup it up on our windows domain. Obviously replace {local time server} with the ip of your local time server if it exists.

          net stop w32time
          w32tm /config /syncfromflags:manual /manualpeerlist:"{local time server}, time.nist.gov"
          w32tm /config /reliable:yes
          net start w32time

          I did not have to make any changes to users workstations, they automatically synced with the DC's.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • StrongBadS
            StrongBad
            last edited by

            I think that we've lost the OP here!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • BRRABillB
              BRRABill
              last edited by

              You know that thread we had once where someone was complaining about how a simple question here always digresses into a mutli-page discussion and then an argument?

              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @BRRABill
                last edited by

                @BRRABill said in Time syncronisation in domain:

                You know that thread we had once where someone was complaining about how a simple question here always digresses into a mutli-page discussion and then an argument?

                At least this one was completely focused on the OP's needs (or explaining what he had said.)

                DustinB3403D BRRABillB 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DustinB3403D
                  DustinB3403 @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said in Time syncronisation in domain:

                  @BRRABill said in Time syncronisation in domain:

                  You know that thread we had once where someone was complaining about how a simple question here always digresses into a mutli-page discussion and then an argument?

                  At least this one was completely focused on the OP's needs (or explaining what he had said.)

                  Trains are pretty awesome!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • BRRABillB
                    BRRABill @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    @scottalanmiller said in Time syncronisation in domain:

                    @BRRABill said in Time syncronisation in domain:

                    You know that thread we had once where someone was complaining about how a simple question here always digresses into a mutli-page discussion and then an argument?

                    At least this one was completely focused on the OP's needs (or explaining what he had said.)

                    Uh....

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • 1
                    • 2
                    • 3
                    • 3 / 3
                    • First post
                      Last post