ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    AMD, trying to mount a comeback.

    News
    amd amd zen
    8
    27
    3.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • zuphzuphZ
      zuphzuph Banned
      last edited by

      Though competition is good for everyone in the end. Keep the prices low and competitive.

      thwrT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • thwrT
        thwr @zuphzuph
        last edited by

        @zuphzuph said in AMD, trying to mount a comeback.:

        Though competition is good for everyone in the end. Keep the prices low and competitive.

        Way more important: It drives innovation.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @zuphzuph
          last edited by

          @zuphzuph said in AMD, trying to mount a comeback.:

          @scottalanmiller Yes I'm talking desktop hardware, CPUs specifically. It could've been my own fault though. I was only 12-13 at the time but I recall my first build which was an AMD chip. I guess I'm just tainted...

          The server space really was almost purely AMD there for a long time, in the same way that Intel dominates today, AMD did even more back then. Intel had no offerings at all for a while.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • hobbit666H
            hobbit666
            last edited by

            wow 32cores that's going to be expensive for licensing when everyone starts doing it based on cores not cpu's 🙂 Like Microsoft SQL and Datacentre

            travisdh1T scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • travisdh1T
              travisdh1 @hobbit666
              last edited by

              @hobbit666 said in AMD, trying to mount a comeback.:

              wow 32cores that's going to be expensive for licensing when everyone starts doing it based on cores not cpu's 🙂 Like Microsoft SQL and Datacentre

              I don't ever want to touch something based on the number of cores it runs on ever again. Such a pain.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @hobbit666
                last edited by

                @hobbit666 said in AMD, trying to mount a comeback.:

                wow 32cores that's going to be expensive for licensing when everyone starts doing it based on cores not cpu's 🙂 Like Microsoft SQL and Datacentre

                Only a few places do that, most are not based around cores. Most enterprise OSes don't need licensing at all. Remember that even 32 cores is tiny for big iron where they are way past these numbers long ago.

                travisdh1T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • travisdh1T
                  travisdh1 @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said in AMD, trying to mount a comeback.:

                  @hobbit666 said in AMD, trying to mount a comeback.:

                  wow 32cores that's going to be expensive for licensing when everyone starts doing it based on cores not cpu's 🙂 Like Microsoft SQL and Datacentre

                  Only a few places do that, most are not based around cores. Most enterprise OSes don't need licensing at all. Remember that even 32 cores is tiny for big iron where they are way past these numbers long ago.

                  Oh, I'm reliving memories from 1997-2002 here, and the licensing associated with IDEAS, CATIA, and Pro-E. Most of those didn't have per-core licensing, but I remember one did. Just thinking about all the licensing servers in use at that place can cause me to have convulsions.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • 1
                  • 2
                  • 2 / 2
                  • First post
                    Last post