Switching subnet /24 to /23
-
@coliver said:
@LAH3385 said:
@coliver said:
Am I reading that right that you want to to exclude the entire 192.168.0.1/24 subnet?
For the time being. yes. It will be open to public later. I don't have a solid game plan yet so might as well keep everything the way it is (starting at .1.xx)
Ah, ok I was just checking.
It is what I told him to do for the immediate change over. I suggested it, because every time I open up a range, I find something that was missed and suddenly people cannot do whatever task they need to.
-
@JaredBusch
To make it simpler for me. Would /22 starting at 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.4.254 better than 192.168.0.1 to 192.168.3.254? -
@LAH3385 said:
@JaredBusch
To make it simpler for me. Would /22 starting at 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.4.254 better than 192.168.0.1 to 192.168.3.254?The /22 network that include 192.168.4.1 is 192.168.4.0-192.168.7.254.
-
@LAH3385 said:
@JaredBusch
To make it simpler for me. Would /22 starting at 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.4.254 better than 192.168.0.1 to 192.168.3.254?it doesn't work that way. You don't get to pick which addresses are part of your /22, the layout of bits in the subnet mask do.
-
Here is a page that talks about how subnetting works, and why it works how it does.
https://www.techopedia.com/6/28587/internet/8-steps-to-understanding-ip-subnetting/3 -
I see.. Gotta play by their rules.
-
@LAH3385 said:
I see.. Gotta play by their rules.
Look at the screenshot provided above, it shows you the range.
-
@LAH3385 said:
I see.. Gotta play by their rules.
Lol thier rules? You're kidding right?
This is all math and the way binary works... They are not just made up rules someone randomly decided to make.
-
@Dashrender said:
They are not just made up rules someone randomly decided to make.
lies! it is magic!
-
