What Are You Doing Right Now
-
@travisdh1 said:
Apparently I'm trolling mangolassi.it while waiting for downloads to finish, equipment to arrive, and people to go home so I can turn the internet off for a bit.
Wait! You can't turn my internet off!
-
NOOOOOOoooooooo !
-
Who gave @travisdh1 the internet box?
[0_1452109649494_iu[1]](Uploading 100%)
-
-
@dafyre said:
@Dashrender said:
NOOOOOOooooo --
blipFixed that for you.
Damn, you're on a roll today!
-
@dafyre said:
@Dashrender said:
NOOOOOOooooo --
blipFixed that for you.
I HAVE THE POWER!!! (Whoever gave it to me went straight to the loony house.)
-
@Dashrender said:
@dafyre said:
@Dashrender said:
NOOOOOOooooo --
blipFixed that for you.
Damn, you're on a roll today!
15-minutes 'till happy hour. All my updates are done. Notes for a 10am meeting prepped tomorrow... No sense in getting into anything else at the moment.
-
@travisdh1 said:
@dafyre said:
@Dashrender said:
NOOOOOOooooo --
blipFixed that for you.
I HAVE THE POWER!!! (Whoever gave it to me went straight to the loony house.)
HUGE COLLOSSAL POWER
itty bitty living space. -
Y'all are very entertaining this afternoon
-
@Minion-Queen said:
Y'all are very entertaining this afternoon
Slow day? I been waiting on Windows Updates on 2 servers... pretty much all day.
-
Found out today that internally Cisco was using OpenFiler to build inverted pyramids of doom for their internal storage systems. But, thankfully, they stumbled on my article about OF on Spiceworks and promptly ripped it out!
-
@scottalanmiller said:
Found out today that internally Cisco was using OpenFiler to build inverted pyramids of doom for their internal storage systems. But, thankfully, they stumbled on my article about OF on Spiceworks and promptly ripped it out!
WOW... what? they didn't want to build a SAN?
-
@Dashrender said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Found out today that internally Cisco was using OpenFiler to build inverted pyramids of doom for their internal storage systems. But, thankfully, they stumbled on my article about OF on Spiceworks and promptly ripped it out!
WOW... what? they didn't want to build a SAN?
they did, using OpenFiler. Then they found out what a disaster that was. They removed it once they read the article.
-
This topic has taught me that almost everyone on SW actively is scamming their companies and is getting sales people to do their jobs for them and actually have created a community where feel that they can publicly act like it is obvious that their job is to do nothing and that they are just paid to let sales people screw the companies that they work for. I would fire nearly everyone over there if they worked for me. Not just lazy but blatantly sabotaging their companies and zero care that they aren't even considering doing the jobs that they are paid to do. It's unreal.
http://community.spiceworks.com/topic/1379258-is-it-lazy-to-have-a-vendor-do-your-research-for-you
The topic is just about a TV. whatever. But the concept is simple... people are paid to do a job and they are refusing to do it and instead of protecting the company from sales people they are selling the company out directly to the people they are hired to protect them from. And no shame about it! If the businesses were okay with letting sales people just dictate everything, why did they hire the IT people in the first place?
-
I know how you feel about sales people, but I think you can trust the right sales people, always with a modicum of research yourself.
Trust but verify.
-
@BRRABill said:
I know how you feel about sales people, but I think you can trust the right sales people, always with a modicum of research yourself.
Trust but verify.
It has nothing whatsoever to do with trust. It is not their job. They don't have the knowledge, the skills, the motivation, the role, the responsibility or a reason to do this well. There is one and only one person whose job this is: the IT pros.
Anyone who would give you good advice is screwing the employer. By definition you can't have a sales person that is trustworthy for IT advice. It's literally impossible. Either they are being unethical to you, to their employer or both. Plain and simple. It's not an option that they are "trustable."
But they are sales people, there is no need for trust as there is nothing to trust. They are not advisers so trust doesn't come into the picture at all. That trust is even considers shows that there is a breakdown.
-
@BRRABill said:
I know how you feel about sales people, but I think you can trust the right sales people,
Those that are scamming their employers? What would a "right" sales person mean to you? To me it is one that ethically does their job and you could never get advice from one of those.
-
Perhaps I am thinking of this on a SOHO level, as usual.
Like if I am thinking of switching AV products, I could reach out to my CDW rep and ask what they like. They ask questions, and come back with something. Generally not my salesperson but the AV person who works there. The AV person would call me and we discuss. Perhaps this is not a true salesperson type scenario. But that is how CDW works at least.
It's not like I am calling and saying "I have $X,000 to spend on AV what's the best?" I know I'll get one that costs $X,000.
-
To IT pros, a best case scenario for this is where WE are the guilty party and screwing a sales person. I've had customers do that to gullible sales people. No matter how it plays out, either the customer or the sales person or both HAS to be unethical and taking advantage of someone for that situation to play out. Because the person hired to do the job isn't doing it no matter what.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
Those that are scamming their employers? What would a "right" sales person mean to you? To me it is one that ethically does their job and you could never get advice from one of those.
It's like the people here on the forum that work for vendors and give us advice. I trust them, as much as I trust anyone.
I don't blindly follow anyone. Even you. LOL.
