ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Solved difference between IP PBX and IP Centrex

    IT Discussion
    5
    78
    21.7k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DashrenderD
      Dashrender @scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      @scottalanmiller said:

      @IT-ADMIN said:

      how do you see the charge, cheap or expensive ?? (sorry i didn't convert the exchange correctly in my previous post, it is 15 $ monthly per extension + one time payment for the installation 164 $)
      the voice gateway is in our premise but owned by the telephone company

      We charge by capacity so it is completely different than with a Centrex system. We don't change by users or extensions since it is a true private PBX.

      So explain how you bill this?

      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @Dashrender
        last edited by

        @Dashrender said:

        So explain how you bill this?

        Super easy... it's a flat rate for a capacity level. Only one level is common as we never see customers go over it. Customers who want a live active/active failover system pay for two. Same as every server everywhere bills for capacity. Just opex, not capex. So same model as any cloud IaaS service, just monthly not hourly.

        DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DashrenderD
          Dashrender @scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          @scottalanmiller said:

          @Dashrender said:

          So explain how you bill this?

          Super easy... it's a flat rate for a capacity level. Only one level is common as we never see customers go over it. Customers who want a live active/active failover system pay for two. Same as every server everywhere bills for capacity. Just opex, not capex. So same model as any cloud IaaS service, just monthly not hourly.

          Frankly I was hoping to see some numbers.

          Something like...
          for 1-10 lines we charge X per line
          for 10-50 lines we charge y per line
          etc.
          DIDs are z more per month, etc.

          JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            That wouldn't be capacity based if there was a breakdown like that. For all intents and purposes it is a set price because the base package handles so much. If you were a large business with 1,000 lines or something I could see that needing to change. But we have big, nationally known brands on the system and some don't even bother to migrate up to larger packages when they are available because they get plenty of capacity as it is (our biggest customer is actually on a system with only 25% of the memory of our current base offering!!)

            So while, in theory, there are tiers, it's all purely theoretical. It's just "how many PBXs do you want?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • JaredBuschJ
              JaredBusch @Dashrender
              last edited by

              @Dashrender said:

              @scottalanmiller said:

              @Dashrender said:

              So explain how you bill this?

              Super easy... it's a flat rate for a capacity level. Only one level is common as we never see customers go over it. Customers who want a live active/active failover system pay for two. Same as every server everywhere bills for capacity. Just opex, not capex. So same model as any cloud IaaS service, just monthly not hourly.

              Frankly I was hoping to see some numbers.

              Something like...
              for 1-10 lines we charge X per line
              for 10-50 lines we charge y per line
              etc.
              DIDs are z more per month, etc.

              The whole "Per line" is the wrong term. That is the legacy thinking that is so wrong with people when looking at VoIP costs.

              Per the hosted model @scottalanmiller is talking about specifically. It is a charge for the PBX only. Nothing else. Your trunks are your own responsibility to pay for. This is the entire point of a hosted PBX. You pay them for ONLY the PBX. Not everything else. Of course @ntg would be happy to be the team configuring things for you too (so would @Bundy-Associates btw). But you pay for your own usage.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                And has it is hosted PBX, not Centrex, the trunks are not included, it is "bring your own trunks." So you can have existing lines that you just point over to it, you can get new ones, you can have one, multiple or even none if you only want an internal messaging platform.

                DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • DashrenderD
                  Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said:

                  And has it is hosted PBX, not Centrex, the trunks are not included, it is "bring your own trunks." So you can have existing lines that you just point over to it, you can get new ones, you can have one, multiple or even none if you only want an internal messaging platform.

                  aww, this was the part I wasn't understanding. You're only selling the PBX service, not the trunks themselves.. Gotcha! Now I understand the flat fee setup.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    That way you can find the right trunk service for you. VoicePulse, voip.ms, Verizon, whoever. You can mix and match, get multiple providers, go for something cheap.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • IT-ADMINI
                      IT-ADMIN
                      last edited by

                      but i don't see the benefit behind paying only for the PBX service, everybody now can have his own PBX on premise, the key feature is how to connect to the PSTN network, and what make sense for me is to pay in order to get connected to the PSTN

                      coliverC JaredBuschJ scottalanmillerS 4 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • coliverC
                        coliver @IT-ADMIN
                        last edited by coliver

                        @IT-ADMIN said:

                        but i don't see the benefit behind paying only for the PBX service, everybody now can have his own PBX on premise, the key feature is how to connect to the PSTN network, and what make sense for me is to pay in order to get connected to the PSTN

                        You wouldn't be able to make your local system as reliable as Rackspace, Amazon, or Azure has made their's. Not to mention that even if you lose internet access locally your PBX will still be able to route calls, you could forward calls to users cell phones or even pick up the handset and move it someplace else that has internet access. Even if no one is able to do either of those things your voicemail would still be accessible.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • JaredBuschJ
                          JaredBusch @IT-ADMIN
                          last edited by

                          @IT-ADMIN said:

                          but i don't see the benefit behind paying only for the PBX service, everybody now can have his own PBX on premise, the key feature is how to connect to the PSTN network, and what make sense for me is to pay in order to get connected to the PSTN

                          Many places outside of Qatar this is not the best way to get reliable service. Your problem is government imposed monopoly.

                          coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                          • coliverC
                            coliver @JaredBusch
                            last edited by

                            @JaredBusch said:

                            @IT-ADMIN said:

                            but i don't see the benefit behind paying only for the PBX service, everybody now can have his own PBX on premise, the key feature is how to connect to the PSTN network, and what make sense for me is to pay in order to get connected to the PSTN

                            Many places outside of Qatar this is not the best way to get reliable service. Your problem is government imposed monopoly.

                            Ah, I keep forgetting the Qatar angle. Sorry my previous comment really doesn't fit in this situation.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller @IT-ADMIN
                              last edited by

                              @IT-ADMIN said:

                              but i don't see the benefit behind paying only for the PBX service, everybody now can have his own PBX on premise, the key feature is how to connect to the PSTN network, and what make sense for me is to pay in order to get connected to the PSTN

                              Like any enterprise server, having on premises is a niche need, not a "standard use case." I'm not saying that it should always be hosted in a datacenter, but getting your servers into enterprise datacenters (colo, cloud computing, whatever) is the majority use case for reliably computing (just meaning 51%+.) If your PBX is critical, why would you have it on premises unless you were in a special case where you primarily need calls in house rather than out of house?

                              PBXs are actually one of the first workloads that you send off to the datacenter because their usefulness when the PSTN disconnects is effectively zero (with only the rarest exceptions.)

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller @IT-ADMIN
                                last edited by

                                @IT-ADMIN said:

                                but i don't see the benefit behind paying only for the PBX service, everybody now can have his own PBX on premise, the key feature is how to connect to the PSTN network, and what make sense for me is to pay in order to get connected to the PSTN

                                All it would take is you wanting to not have a Qatar phone number and instantly having in house PBX would make little sense for you currently as well. It isn't just that you are in Qatar, it is solely that you are in Qatar and want a local phone number that makes things seem different there.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • IT-ADMINI
                                  IT-ADMIN
                                  last edited by

                                  yeah guys you are right, i forget the advantage that even if you have internet cut, you cab still have incoming calls alike if you have it on premise,
                                  so i have a question here, you said that you host the PBX and you have nothing to do with connecting it to the PSTN, so how it is connected to the PSTN, is the customer pay the telephone company to provide you with the POTS lines or ISDN line or your service is limited to connect the PBX to the PSTN via internet telephony (voip trunk)

                                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller @IT-ADMIN
                                    last edited by

                                    @IT-ADMIN said:

                                    so i have a question here, you said that you host the PBX and you have nothing to do with connecting it to the PSTN, so how it is connected to the PSTN, is the customer pay the telephone company to provide you with the POTS lines or ISDN line or your service is limited to connect the PBX to the PSTN via internet telephony (voip trunk)

                                    VoicePulse, voip.ms or any trunk provider that you want. Same as if you hosted on premises. Nothing changes when it goes hosted except you get support and it is in an enterprise datacenter.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      This is VoIP, you would never get POTS or ISDN.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • IT-ADMINI
                                        IT-ADMIN
                                        last edited by

                                        great i understand now
                                        thank you

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • IT-ADMINI
                                          IT-ADMIN
                                          last edited by

                                          i know that you hate connecting the PBX via POTS or ISDN, lol
                                          you are all the time recommending using Voip Providers 😉

                                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • scottalanmillerS
                                            scottalanmiller @IT-ADMIN
                                            last edited by

                                            @IT-ADMIN said:

                                            i know that you hate connecting the PBX via POTS or ISDN, lol
                                            you are all the time recommending using Voip Providers 😉

                                            Well we are way past 2003. I recommend email over snail mail and telephones over screaming from tree tops.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 2 / 4
                                            • First post
                                              Last post