@Dashrender said:

And I have to assume the version of Windows running on it is RT, and we still don't know if MS is going to be making Windows 10 for ARM.

It's dual processors, obviously. They two OSes run at the same time and one runs in a way that can be disconnected. All of the devices like this are dual procs. That's what makes them work. ARM for Android because it needs to be low power and AMD64 for Windows because it doesn't run on ARM.

RT would be completely useless as, it just is. Android can run on AMD64 but not at the same time that Windows is.

And the exact problem I am having is that the Dynamics NAV SQL Server and the RDS server when both put on Pertino were routing all traffic over Pertino instead of locally. I took the SQL server out of the network (made its own network) and everything started working again.

What Pertino is waiting on me for is some packet captures that I have not had time to create.

Because I seen odd behavior of LAN devices without Pertino also having problems access SQL. Those devices have the NAV client locally installed.

Same reason that large companies create employee IDs that are unique and don't mean anything. Just no way to have the users' names be the ID no matter how to mash it up. There just has to be an ID field that is unique and separate from other data.

Thanks for the write-up.

Good to know! Thanks!

@garak0410 said:

@thanksaj said:

@garak0410 said:

@thanksaj said:

@garak0410 said:

@thanksaj said:

Is it always the same document that has the issue? Same font?

Happens to all paper sizes...all drivers and OSes (Windows 7 and 8.1)...even the built in paper path test and configuration pages...

Then that basically rules out software issues. Given the situation, there may be something wrong with the fuser, transfer roller, or a couple other components. I'd say it's time to replace the unit, unless you want to spend a small fortune getting an HP technician to look at it and only possibly fix it.

I am thinking it may be the transfer roller...I looked at it again and a plastic gear piece was sitting inside of it...didn't immediately see where it went but I have one on order just to see...would be amazing if that was the only problem.

Another common maintenance item on high volume printers.

I think it may have broke when I replaced it about 3-4 weeks ago, which is when this problem happened. But didn't equate it with that...ugggh.

Well hopefully this fixes it!

@Minion-Queen said:

It's weird cause nothing seems to be consistent. Some of us say Safari is fine other say chrome. Others can't use either.

Important question is... Chrome on what? Chrome on iPhone is still Safari under the hood. Chrome elsewhere is not.

@Reid-Cooper said:

That is a very strange business name. No wonder no one figured out what it was.

haha ehh I don't know Sir, that's why i asked..
Now i know 😉

I have seen the same thing. Often VoIP reliability simply outperforms traditional phone types. VoIP gets so much more modern infrastructure and has so much more resiliency, mostly in the ability for the end users (customers) to enact their own redundancy strategies whereas traditional phone types required complete dependence on a single vendor to supply all reliability and if they failed to do so there was little recourse leaving little incentive for them to do a good job.

@scottalanmiller said:

@thanksaj said:

@scottalanmiller not the point I was making.

Just saying that it could be super easy with effectively zero effort.

Yeah, I know. A bookmark in Chrome works just as well. Lol

So weird, you click on Not Junk and it asks if you always trust. Bah...that doesn't work.

Reading can be informational!

I have also manually added email addresses to Safe Senders in Oulook's Junk E-mail options.

FF 33 and haven't encountered any problem so far 🙂

Hmm...

Oh well.. I might just stick an MS OS back on an old PE box and use NTbackup.. It's simple,.. but doable.

@technobabble said:

@thanksaj said:

What PC are they connecting to, and are the credentials stored in the browser on that computer somehow? I'm confused how having them remote into a specific PC to do this when they likely need to know the credentials anyways adds any value.

This would be a one time log in and no, the password is not saved.

Ok, so how does having them use a separate PC make anything more secure? Unless they are using personal machines for work...

@Reid-Cooper said:

Maybe Webroot should have a tweet for everytime that it is blocked!

I like it!

Interface is everything isn't it? What's so great about the backend?

One of these days I'll finally get organised with my photos. Maybe....One day......