Double check both the SHARE permissions, and the NTFS permissions...

My situation wasn't a snapshop - it was a fast copy.. so I'm not really sure.

@hobbit666 said:

Well ordered my First 2, should be here soon, but had day off today and again Thursday so not sure if i'll be able to play with them 😞

The demo model worked amazingly well, about to order another 3, replace their current hardware for them.

@Jason said:

We use LogMeIn.. seems slow. Granted I rarely use it anyway since I'm on the network/server side.

You know, I rarely had slowness issues - though for the past year I haven't been able to do remote control from the browser, instead I have to use the installed client to connect and do remote control.

A minor PITA after using and launching solely from the browser.

@dsc81 said:

@scottalanmiller
What I mean is I only can upload one file at a time, I heard that we can setting so we can upload many file at once and also the limit is only 2mb, can we upload file 5GB?

You need to configure your system to fix the PHP issue restricting filesize.

You have multiple options for connectivity. if you are using the web browser, the basic setup is single file uplaods.

How is it doing?

@aaronstuder said:

@gjacobse said:

What I have used for the last several years,.. both at home and in the office.

1456080942328-img_2234.jpg

In the last apartment we had, I mounted it to the side/back of a short bookcase.

Why are the cables so long? Where they out of black zip ties?

Cables are what I have acquired over the years,.. and I didn't feel like cutting and terminating them.

No, not out of black. just the only color I have..

I recently learned, that for companies like CloudFlare to provide full on secure access as you, they have to be allowed to create certs in your name. I'm not sure how I feel about this, but there are definitely ubber concerned people who won't allow certificates like this to leave their own control.

@dafyre said:

@JaredBusch said:

@dafyre said:

As a matter of correctness... Do you have EPEL /REMI or any other repos installed in your CentOS 7 image?

The script is connecting the Gitlab RPM, that is all. The base image he uses for all of these is CentOS 7 minimal, release 1511 unless he has changed the base template on his scale cluster.

Right. I'm just curious if he has added the epel-release or any other repos to it.

Definitely no EPEL. I often use it, but avoid it in the base image.

@scottalanmiller said:

What does Drush do? What requirements does it have that keep it from getting installed?

Drush is a CLI tool for Drupal. You can pretty much manage your whole site with it. But you need root access (or sudo).

If you update Drupal manually on shared hosting you pretty much have to back up the whole site, redownload the new Drupal version, reupload your sites folder (where all your info is), change the DB settings file, and chmod it.

With drush you type drush up drupal and you're done.

Or if you want to update everything (modules and themes also) type drush up

It's more of a pain with shared hosting to do all of that also.

To see if I could reproduce the error by moving the account from the default Users folder back to the OU where it was I discovered that when I moved it to the Users folder the error went away. I put the user back in the OU where it came from and the error won't come back. I agree - weird indeed.

In summary, I guess if I move those users to the Users folder and back where they came from, the problem should be resolved. I'll have to test on a couple other users.

@scottalanmiller said:

@johnhooks said:

Firefox hello looks interesting but I haven't needed to use it with anyone yet.

I've been looking at that.

I set it up but have not tried it yet.

RH 5 was the first Red Hat Linux that I used. It released in 1997!! About to turn twenty!

After doing everything the articles said and rebooting the server, when it still wasn't working, I wondered if it had something to do with not being able to write to those attributes, so I created a test account in the users OU, and it worked. Checking the license log, I noticed that the server had been giving out licenses properly, but not for all accounts. Then I went through the log again and discovered that all the 4105 errors were generated by accounts that were not in the default Users OU.

@IRJ said:

IMO it's not a driver issue if it can't serve the printers. Driver issues will occur after you try adding the printer from your workstation

There is very little information. You may be right. I know that I have run into similar problems and it's been driver related.

_(ツ)_/¯

@scottalanmiller Right back at you

@Dashrender said:

Yep, that's why it's currently not a real concern.

And only certain Intel CPUs. AMD users are in the clear right now.

@Jason said:

Rack mounted desktops like dell Precisions are great for high end 3d CAD (way way overkill for 2D), Animation, Video Production etc.

Pretty common setup. They make remote graphics cards with client stations designed for these setups.

Yup, while not "in every corner office", the rack mounted desktop is a long standing use case and works quite well.

Oracle is $15/user. That's rather high.