ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Elon Musk on Open Source

    News
    open source
    6
    22
    2.6k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • mlnewsM
      mlnews
      last edited by

      elon musk of tesla on open source

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 5
      • DashrenderD
        Dashrender
        last edited by

        So what? Did he really open source his patents?

        travisdh1T coliverC scottalanmillerS 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • travisdh1T
          travisdh1 @Dashrender
          last edited by

          @Dashrender said:

          So what? Did he really open source his patents?

          I think so, tho I haven't seen them myself yet.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • coliverC
            coliver @Dashrender
            last edited by

            @Dashrender said:

            So what? Did he really open source his patents?

            Yep. https://www.teslamotors.com/blog/all-our-patent-are-belong-you

            From everything I've read (not that blog post yet) Tesla is really doubling down on this idea. They want other small manufacturers to get involved and force the infrastructure update, and battery research, to match what they are building.

            travisdh1T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @Dashrender
              last edited by

              @Dashrender said:

              So what? Did he really open source his patents?

              That's what I hear! Not open source exactly, really just "opened" them. The term open source specifically refers to code and patents can't actually include code. But he make them open in the same manner.

              coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • travisdh1T
                travisdh1 @coliver
                last edited by

                @coliver said:

                @Dashrender said:

                So what? Did he really open source his patents?

                Yep. https://www.teslamotors.com/blog/all-our-patent-are-belong-you

                From everything I've read (not that blog post yet) Tesla is really doubling down on this idea. They want other small manufacturers to get involved and force the infrastructure update, and battery research, to match what they are building.

                Well, now I see them, thanks.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • coliverC
                  coliver @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said:

                  @Dashrender said:

                  So what? Did he really open source his patents?

                  That's what I hear! Not open source exactly, really just "opened" them. The term open source specifically refers to code and patents can't actually include code. But he make them open in the same manner.

                  There isn't a mechanism to "open source "a US patent at this point in time unless you give up your rights to it. What Tesla has said was they will not pursue any litigation if you use their patents/technologies in good faith. I'm not sure how that will work legally, from my understanding if you let one person get away with using your patent then everyone can.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    Yesterday, there was a wall of Tesla patents in the lobby of our Palo Alto headquarters. That is no longer the case. They have been removed, in the spirit of the open source movement, for the advancement of electric vehicle technology.

                    Tesla Motors was created to accelerate the advent of sustainable transport. If we clear a path to the creation of compelling electric vehicles, but then lay intellectual property landmines behind us to inhibit others, we are acting in a manner contrary to that goal. Tesla will not initiate patent lawsuits against anyone who, in good faith, wants to use our technology.

                    When I started out with my first company, Zip2, I thought patents were a good thing and worked hard to obtain them. And maybe they were good long ago, but too often these days they serve merely to stifle progress, entrench the positions of giant corporations and enrich those in the legal profession, rather than the actual inventors. After Zip2, when I realized that receiving a patent really just meant that you bought a lottery ticket to a lawsuit, I avoided them whenever possible.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DustinB3403D
                      DustinB3403
                      last edited by

                      That is pretty awesome that he'd go that route.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DashrenderD
                        Dashrender
                        last edited by

                        Sadly though, considering the current climate, someone like Elon needs to actually hold said patents to keep other patent trolls from creating them and suing.

                        scottalanmillerS DustinB3403D 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                          last edited by

                          @Dashrender said:

                          Sadly though, considering the current climate, someone like Elon needs to actually hold said patents to keep other patent trolls from creating them and suing.

                          Hence why there are massive mutual non-aggression agreements. A few large companies with massive portfolios like Tesla has give a lot away but with an agreement that if the other companies decide to patent troll, that all of the patents they are using are no longer free.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DustinB3403D
                            DustinB3403 @Dashrender
                            last edited by

                            @Dashrender He couldn't be sued for someone else using the patents that he's "opened up" for everyone to use in good faith.

                            What he's done is made it possible so he can sue anyone who tries to use his designed for personal gain, rather than for things like global improvement or charity.

                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
                              last edited by

                              @DustinB3403 said:

                              @Dashrender He couldn't be sued for someone else using the patents that he's "opened up" for everyone to use in good faith.

                              What he's done is made it possible so he can sue anyone who tries to use his designed for personal gain, rather than for things like global improvement or charity.

                              In what way? That goes completely against what his statement was. He was very clear that he did this in the same spirit as the open source movement. If he has the ability to sue for personal use, he's done nothing like open source.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • DustinB3403D
                                DustinB3403
                                last edited by

                                From your quote " Tesla will not initiate patent lawsuits against anyone who, in good faith, wants to use our technology."

                                Meaning that they have a way to measure "good faith" versus personal gain.

                                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote -1
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
                                  last edited by

                                  @DustinB3403 said:

                                  Meaning that they have a way to measure "good faith" versus personal gain.

                                  Good faith and personal gain are not connected in that way at all. This is specifically for personal gain. Going after someone who used them for personal gain would itself violate good faith.

                                  Good faith here would mean using it to hurt people or attack Tesla.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    For example... using a Tesla patent to make a new patent that is then not opened would be bad faith.

                                    Using a Tesla patent to make money by selling products based on it would be good faith. That use is the intention of the opening of them.

                                    coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • coliverC
                                      coliver @scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      @scottalanmiller said:

                                      For example... using a Tesla patent to make a new patent that is then not opened would be bad faith.

                                      Using a Tesla patent to make money by selling products based on it would be good faith. That use is the intention of the opening of them.

                                      This is how interpreted it as well.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • DustinB3403D
                                        DustinB3403
                                        last edited by

                                        So it's fair game for personal profit to use the patients...

                                        It really does seem like he's giving away the horse and buggy. But at the same time any improvements they make must also be open to be used by anyone else.

                                        So yeah it makes sense now that it's explained like that.

                                        scottalanmillerS DashrenderD 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote -1
                                        • DustinB3403D
                                          DustinB3403
                                          last edited by

                                          Kind of forces corporations to embrace open source if they want to use what he's patented.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote -1
                                          • scottalanmillerS
                                            scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
                                            last edited by

                                            @DustinB3403 said:

                                            So it's fair game for personal profit to use the patients...

                                            Yup, in the spirit of the open source movement. Think about Linux, FreeBSD, LibreOffice, Apache, Firefox and more.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 1 / 2
                                            • First post
                                              Last post