ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    DNS issue

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    43 Posts 10 Posters 9.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • PSX_DefectorP
      PSX_Defector @JaredBusch
      last edited by

      @JaredBusch said:

      @PSX_Defector said:

      Depends on the vendor, maybe your DNS servers are not getting the info properly.

      SBS is using 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 as the forwarders

      Strange, maybe the NS is doing some kind of tricks on their end to put in the WWW for the customer. But I can only see what I see.

      C:\Users\v436525\Downloads\BIND9.10.1-P1.x64>dig @8.8.8.8 guardiananytime.com an
      y

      ; <<>> DiG 9.10.1-P1 <<>> @8.8.8.8 guardiananytime.com any
      ; (1 server found)
      ;; global options: +cmd
      ;; Got answer:
      ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 50753
      ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

      ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
      ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
      ;; QUESTION SECTION:
      ;guardiananytime.com. IN ANY

      ;; ANSWER SECTION:
      guardiananytime.com. 21599 IN SOA dns1p.prod.gliconline.com. bnico
      lai.glic.com. 2005165536 21600 3600 604800 600
      guardiananytime.com. 21599 IN NS rdrcdns.glic.com.
      guardiananytime.com. 21599 IN NS dns1p.prod.gliconline.com.
      guardiananytime.com. 3599 IN A 63.66.47.183

      ;; Query time: 202 msec
      ;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8)
      ;; WHEN: Mon Feb 23 11:24:07 Central Standard Time 2015
      ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 172

      C:\Users\v436525\Downloads\BIND9.10.1-P1.x64>dig @8.8.4.4 guardiananytime.com an
      y

      ; <<>> DiG 9.10.1-P1 <<>> @8.8.4.4 guardiananytime.com any
      ; (1 server found)
      ;; global options: +cmd
      ;; Got answer:
      ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 51353
      ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

      ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
      ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
      ;; QUESTION SECTION:
      ;guardiananytime.com. IN ANY

      ;; ANSWER SECTION:
      guardiananytime.com. 21578 IN SOA dns1p.prod.gliconline.com. bnico
      lai.glic.com. 2005165536 21600 3600 604800 600
      guardiananytime.com. 21578 IN NS rdrcdns.glic.com.
      guardiananytime.com. 21578 IN NS dns1p.prod.gliconline.com.
      guardiananytime.com. 3578 IN A 63.66.47.183

      ;; Query time: 37 msec
      ;; SERVER: 8.8.4.4#53(8.8.4.4)
      ;; WHEN: Mon Feb 23 11:24:28 Central Standard Time 2015
      ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 172

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • tonyshowoffT
        tonyshowoff @JaredBusch
        last edited by

        @JaredBusch said:

        Do people not read? I clearly stated that his was not a domain owned by the SBS server....

        I know I don't.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • DashrenderD
          Dashrender
          last edited by

          I'm betting the DNS has a *.guardiananytime.com listing and that's what's being picked up. But for some reason, the client was failing over to IPv6 for the WWW request instead of getting forward to the * entry.
          And if not a * DNS, PSX is probably right that the DNS provider is doing a * entry transparently.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • D
            doyle.jack
            last edited by

            I generally skip forwarders all together. I've never used them. But then again, I've never found a reason to.

            DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DashrenderD
              Dashrender @doyle.jack
              last edited by

              @doyle.jack said:

              I generally skip forwarders all together. I've never used them. But then again, I've never found a reason to.

              I take this to mean that you rely on the Root Hints alone?

              D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                doyle.jack @Dashrender
                last edited by doyle.jack

                @Dashrender - You generally rely on one or the other. I don't know that it will use both root hints and forwarders.

                You do get slightly better performance out of forwarders, but we're talking about miliseconds. Also, if you have multiple DNS servers, you should remember that forwarders are not stored in Active Directory. You would need to configure your forwarders on each of your DNS servers independently.

                Root Hints tend to provide more redundancy. While you only see thirteen of them in the list, many of them are distributed geographically and provide their own type of fault tolerance. I believe there are 457 active root DNS servers right now.

                The difference in performance is so small that it's really only a matter of preference. You'll get the same result with either. The only real difference is that when you are using Root Hints, you'll perform a series of iterative queries and expect referrals until you get the authoritative server for the domain you're interested in. When you use a forwarder, you're sending a single recursive query to the forwarder and letting that DNS server handle all of the iterative queries and return you the final answer.

                Personal preference. I go with the one that requires less configuration and provides more reliability, even if it's at the expense of a few miliseconds on the response time.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • DashrenderD
                  Dashrender
                  last edited by

                  Yeah, that's what I figured.

                  Nice write up!

                  D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D
                    doyle.jack @Dashrender
                    last edited by

                    @Dashrender Thank you. I made two quick edits. I had originally used "query" in one place and meant to make it plural. Also, I put that Forwarders are not stored in DNS and meant to type Active Directory. I guess DNS was just on my mind.. hehe.

                    I do believe that Windows DNS Server has an option to use Root Hints if forwarders are not available, so if you ever do use Forwarders, you probably want to turn that feature on as a backup.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DashrenderD
                      Dashrender
                      last edited by

                      Your changes were appearing while I was reading it.

                      I normally have about 6-8 forwarders when I use them so I rarely have an issue. Though if I'm having that kind of issue I probably have bigger problems.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • ?
                        A Former User
                        last edited by

                        I've never had good luck with Root Hints, always odd issues would pop up. But if you use forwarders don't use your ISPs either..

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • 1
                        • 2
                        • 3
                        • 3 / 3
                        • First post
                          Last post